Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

reading the m35 gas thread

$5000 initial outlay for a liquid gas injection system is a bit steep (using the thread as reference) but so is nistune, intercooler, and anyother tricks to lower consumption down to a level which is considered the stageas besf but far from viable.

anyone had experience with gas installations on stageas/r34s? yes i will loose a bit of boot space, but our dog is small :thumbsup:

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i guess (with searching) if anyone knows a gas place in adelaide with half a brain who can do a LiLPG or a dam good gas conversion otherwise, feel free to PM me.

nth to central to east suburbs, but willing to travel for good workmanship.

Is gas really worth it?

Ive known a few people that have had conversions done, and none of them said it was worth it in the end. They were all average car users, nothing excessive like taxis.

Maybe it would be worth it to buy a factory fitted LPG system, like on a commodore, but otherwise I dont think its a good economical idea.

At least with E85 you can retain most of your standard fuel injection system.

Edited by zoomzoom

or go m35 axis - it is starting to look like a realistic option now...

Hmmm...don't expect any fuel savings there. I get 14-15 L/100 KM with City driving...

on the Freeway its 10L/100KM...but I don't use the freeway enough...

I guess i must make this clear, i am not after a performance upgrade although retaining its current performance is highly sought

i'm up for making the stagea into a more viable option for daily duties when compared to selling.

the appeal of the stagea in terms of its functionality holds significant weight already

the good ol search function had some great info and i have been recommended some people to have a chat with.

I am happy for more opinions but its about time i speak to some experts about making it happen

it is a avenue i am willing to explore further.

Edited by 910trx

Do the front pipe - get a Nistune and a good tuner and tell him that economy is a priority. You shouldn't need two boost settings you have a controller called your right foot!!

I couldn't agree more.

I reckon you are right there....I have done everything to mine in various stages and never got better than 350 to a tank regularly (about 17l). I do use it in heavy traffic and I have a heavy foot.

I might swap cars with one of you guys that gets 10 or 12 for a couple of weeks and see if it is me or the car :P

On the bright side.....its a bloody brilliant car

Ms Wolv generally gets around 14L/100km with a >260rwkw car driving in Sydney traffic. She doesn't drive it that hard but likes to give it a squirt off the line to irritate Falcodores with stripes on the side. On the highway we got it down to 11.5L/100km with Bells Line of Rd - Bathurst pussyfooting around.

I have no idea how to get the fuel usage down to 10L/100km without driving like Miss Daisy and even then it looks unlikely.

I guess i must make this clear, i am not after a performance upgrade although retaining its current performance is highly sought

i'm up for making the stagea into a more viable option for daily duties when compared to selling.

the appeal of the stagea in terms of its functionality holds significant weight already

the good ol search function had some great info and i have been recommended some people to have a chat with.

I am happy for more opinions but its about time i speak to some experts about making it happen

it is a avenue i am willing to explore further.

I think KiwiRS4T has called it spot on. This would be your best option to trim some fuel and keep the enjoyment up.

I have a very stock (k&n pannel filter) s2 c34 auto. I averaged 8.6l/100km over 2200km @100km/h and we get 12-13lt/100km around town.

I have a couple of mates with fordterries the NA version runs around 18-21lt/100km and the turbo version runs upwards of 27lt/100km!!!

.........and you think stags are bad.

Cheers

Justin

I have a very stock (k&n pannel filter) s2 c34 auto. I averaged 8.6l/100km over 2200km @100km/h and we get 12-13lt/100km around town.

I have a couple of mates with fordterries the NA version runs around 18-21lt/100km and the turbo version runs upwards of 27lt/100km!!!

.........and you think stags are bad.

Cheers

Justin

how did you manage to get it that low on the highway? i get about 10-11 in a manual s2

ouch to the terrys, but they do weigh about 2 tonnes

my gf's dad said that his n/a terry got about 9/100 on the highway tho

Edited by pipster11

how did you manage to get it that low on the highway? i get about 10-11 in a manual s2

ouch to the terrys, but they do weigh about 2 tonnes

my gf's dad said that his n/a terry got about 9/100 on the highway tho

It's a long straight road from Brisbane to Tassie... Conservative driving, 45psi in the tires, driving mostly at night... I've found if you can minimise the stop start accelerate driving, the fuel use is cut in half.

Terry 9lt/ ... maybe at 60km/h. Ha ha ha.

Justin.

It's a long straight road from Brisbane to Tassie... Conservative driving, 45psi in the tires, driving mostly at night... I've found if you can minimise the stop start accelerate driving, the fuel use is cut in half.

That makes a whole lot more sense to me now. :cheers:

i admit the times it went under 10/L was 100km ph, 12`c ambient temp, 4am, hay plains no wind, cruise control

but was carrying stuff on roof, 3 very tired Moto GP fans, a full boot of tents, pots and err other things, and no one to follow to break up the air a little

3 1/2 tanks round trip too and from phillip island in total - melbourne destroyed our figures :angry: and thats the problem

i do gold coast -> tassie at least twice a year

i never thought about going at night tho, less traffic and cooler temps

maybe i should also put some cheese cutter wheels on too :P

Hmmm...don't expect any fuel savings there. I get 14-15 L/100 KM with City driving...

on the Freeway its 10L/100KM...but I don't use the freeway enough...

These figures seem about standard from ALL the reading ive been doing.

In saying that... they are quite impressive when you consider the car is awd and weighs in over 1600kg

I have just purchased my 99 S2 stag, stock. Still on first tank and its looking like i'll get 250km out of this tank.

Having read the various thread regarding fuel economy im guessing a tune exhaust and o2 sensor could be my problem......it does smell a little rich

hmmm, realistically, although this sounds negative, I've yet to hear of any modification you can do that will save you more in fuel costs than the modification itself costs...at least not within 2 years.

EDIT: that is, unless your car has a problem which is causing the poor fuel economy. eg. replacing a stuffed O2 sensor will easily pay for itself...

Even if you dropped your consumption by 2L/100km, which is a lot, you'd only save say 4-8L/week which still works out to less than $12 a week in savings...and I doubt you'll be able to drop your consumption by anywhere near 2L/100km for less than $600 or so.

Having owned a s2 stagea for 2 years and a M35 for 2.3 years, I eventually gave up trying to do anything about the fuel usage, other than just adjusting your driving style or just plain driving less.

A bigger turbo and exhaust will save on fuel (the turbo - due to being off-boost more) but the cost outweighs any financial benefit and the laggier turbo has its own share of frustration to go with it.

Sorry I couldn't offer you a brighter perspective...but them's the facts. Work out where your priorities lie. If you want to keep the stagea, then cut down in other areas...but if you would prefer not to cut back on other luxuries (eating out etc) then maybe that's telling you the stagea has to go. Just trying to help :) Been through that decision so many times until eventually I gave in and sold the stagea. The mortgage always wins.

Edited by pixel8r

don't put fuel in it is my current fuel saving regime at the moment

i've only used about 5 litres in the last week (and there is probably only 5 litres left in the tank)

hmmm, realistically, although this sounds negative, I've yet to hear of any modification you can do that will save you more in fuel costs than the modification itself costs...at least not within 2 years.

EDIT: that is, unless your car has a problem which is causing the poor fuel economy. eg. replacing a stuffed O2 sensor will easily pay for itself...

Even if you dropped your consumption by 2L/100km, which is a lot, you'd only save say 4-8L/week which still works out to less than $12 a week in savings...and I doubt you'll be able to drop your consumption by anywhere near 2L/100km for less than $600 or so.

Having owned a s2 stagea for 2 years and a M35 for 2.3 years, I eventually gave up trying to do anything about the fuel usage, other than just adjusting your driving style or just plain driving less.

A bigger turbo and exhaust will save on fuel (the turbo - due to being off-boost more) but the cost outweighs any financial benefit and the laggier turbo has its own share of frustration to go with it.

Sorry I couldn't offer you a brighter perspective...but them's the facts. Work out where your priorities lie. If you want to keep the stagea, then cut down in other areas...but if you would prefer not to cut back on other luxuries (eating out etc) then maybe that's telling you the stagea has to go. Just trying to help :) Been through that decision so many times until eventually I gave in and sold the stagea. The mortgage always wins.

You got it 100% right buddy.

The cheapest things Ive done to help fuel economy: (cant be scientific about what did what)

New O2 sensor - the original one lasted 110k kms so definitely needed replacing

Clean out of the induction system, the plenum, and auxiliary air valve on the plenum, which got the idle timing back to where it should be

Injector cleaner - skeptical this stuff does anything

This all yielded about a 1.5L/100 km improvement.

My series 1 now uses 12-13L/100km around town

Edited by zoomzoom

Lets all run out and get HHO generators, fuel line magnets and other fuel saving gizzmoos.... Ba ha ha.

I honestly think a 3lt conversion on low boost with a good tune will improve my fuel useage. Not enough to justify the cost of the conversion, but it's a contributing factor for it.

Cheers

Justin.

I just don't see it as an "economy" car.

Enjoy it for what it is, a brilliant tourer, with a hell of a turn of speed, when you want it. Economy is for lasers and 323's

Hell, you could be driving a Magna...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...