Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a 3in exhaust and make 350rwkw.

I would be interesting to see what it would make if you dropped the cat back. The consensus here appears to be that people find they can get good gains at that power level by going bigger than 3in. Nismoid posted;

300kw = 3in

350kw = 3.5in

400kw = 4in

recently as a rough guideline/rule of thumb on what is the sweet spot for exhaust sizing. No doubt he'll slap me if i've misunderstood his post.

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

^ and that's the thing. You can make power on a 3" exhaust.

However as many have seen before, a simply upgrade to 3.5" or 4" gives them better power overall, more timing, same boost.

Not unknown for a car to take an extra 2-4 degree's of timing, make 10-20rwkw more and not have an increase in boost what so ever just from exhaust changes like that.

On E85 / -5s / built motor = over 400rwkw

But as i said about the OP's exhaust, the CAT is 100% a problem. No doubt about it. 4" CAT as a min.

Just have a look down one, it can't possibly not pose a restriction hence a nice big mofo is needed, bigger than the exhaust itself.

Jez, I haven't run this one down the 1/4. I haven't ran a car for 3 years! :blush: I actually changed it to this cat as the one it had previously looked old. This cat looked exactly the same as the previous one. It's probably not crash hot, a 3" 400 cell.

I saw that too, Adam. So thanks for clarifying Ash. I will go 4" to save upgrading again later. Does any one do a bolt in 4"? I know X-Force do a 3.5" bolt in, but would ideally be after a 4".

Just drop the exhaust from before the CAT for the time being - see what gains you get first up

i like this idea... take it to the closest peace of straight road and see if it makes a diffrence......take a video cam with you too so we all can here it... lol

ahh yea and thats a private straight road if anyone asks too.....

I have a built forged engine running standard cams with Tomei cam gears, standard head, air box and running -5s at around 20 psi on a safe tune.

The exhaust is 3.5" with a matrix 3.5" cat, this reduces down to a 3" exhaust about 600mm past the cat which includes two 3" elbows and a 3"muffler.

The cars at the workshop now and they are changing it to a full 3.5" system with a dyno run for minor adjustments to suit, its currently pulling 338Kws, this is a genuine back to back dyno run with an exhaust upgrade so it will be interesting to see what and if there is any differance in the power levels running the same psi and safe tune, results next week, Cheers.

I went through the same predicament as you a few months back - trying to get better results out of -5's.

Any chance your intercooler is a restriction? I changed mine to a thicker core and got better response and top end power.

Thanks for that Damien, that'll be next round of mods if I don't get much out of this lot.

Only after 10% at this stage (hopefully enough boost to wake up the -5s) which I think is probably realistic.

^ and that's the thing. You can make power on a 3" exhaust.

However as many have seen before, a simply upgrade to 3.5" or 4" gives them better power overall, more timing, same boost.

Not unknown for a car to take an extra 2-4 degree's of timing, make 10-20rwkw more and not have an increase in boost what so ever just from exhaust changes like that.

But as i said about the OP's exhaust, the CAT is 100% a problem. No doubt about it. 4" CAT as a min.

Just have a look down one, it can't possibly not pose a restriction hence a nice big mofo is needed, bigger than the exhaust itself.

So wouldnt some bigger aftermarket dump pipes tie in with this concept? The same logic of being able to run more timing surely applies, factory dumps are shocking lookin things with all their castings and restrictions. Im not sure why'd you do the cat and not the dumps...not stirring just sayin, you cant look at the cat and the factory dumps and say one poses more of restriction than the other, all the heat is in the first foot or so of the exhaust.

I didn't do the dumps because I had often seen 380+kW seen being made by R33 and R34 dump pipes. I am yet to see a 3" Catco (not metal) do that kind of power?

I've bought a 5" Cat, 550cc injectors, plugs and APEXi pods (second hand - just in case my tuner really, really wants to fit them... I'd prefer to stay with the air box I went to an effort of sourcing and fitting).

Still got to buy cam gears, coil packs and 100k service kit.

  • 3 weeks later...

OK, I've questioned whether the injectors I bought are big enough... They aren't 550cc but Blitz 534cc. How much power can these handle? (I don't know the specs of delivery for calculations. >_< )

Would these be better?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/RB26DETT-7MGE-7MGTE-4ME-5ME-rb26-680cc-Fuel-Injectors-_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem27b8a9b421QQitemZ170601853985QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories

More than happy to listen to recommendations for new ones if mine are too small... :cheers:

OK, I've questioned whether the injectors I bought are big enough... They aren't 550cc but Blitz 534cc. How much power can these handle?

The rule of thumb is 1hp at the flywheel for each 1cc of injector with pump 98 - so the 550/534 size suits -7s or -9s. If you're going to keep the boost down to keep the unbuilt motor safe (ie the 330kw you mentioned) you should be ok. If injector duty gets tight you can just pull the boost down a little further.

It seems to me there's two clear options - Which of these are you aiming for?

1. Cheap - unbuilt motor, -7s/-9s, 550cc, 3 or 3.5 inch exhaust

2. $$$$$ - built motor, -5s, 700cc, 3.5 or 4 inch exhaust, aftermarket gear set to stop third from stripping :whistling:

Of course if you go with option 1 with -5s you don't have the most responsive turbos, but since its expensive to change, maybe you can just live with it.

I went through the same predicament as you a few months back - trying to get better results out of -5's.

Any chance your intercooler is a restriction? I changed mine to a thicker core and got better response and top end power.

At what level did you run out of puff with the std GTR intercooler?

I had mine tuned on e85 and gained bugger all top end, only 5rwkw, and that was pumping more boost into it.

Granted it was tuned on a bloody hot day, 35+ degrees. the intake temps were quite high. and the tuner gave the car long breaks inbetween runs. the midrange is wild now and it pulls over 500nm of toque. so its fairly punchy.

I'm going to take it back someday and get it tuned again on a cooler day just so he can tidy up the tune as he left the top end a little rich just incase it was a cold night and the mixtures leaned out too much. rather be safe than sorry.

I've been looking around for a FMIC but finding one that will flow 400kw is quite $$$

I'm not too keen on getting a cheapie like cooling pro and finding that its no good and i've wasted my money by getting one that doesnt flow aswell or has a severe pressure drop.

It becomes a very expensive task to get a 2.6L motor over the 350rwkw mark.

i've been told that the big gains are to be made in the midrange on e85 rather than top end, is that correct?

Thanks Adam, I figured the 20% additional flow should be able to cope at this stage. Seems like I was right, I just saw Nismoid mention minimum 700cc in another thread and started to wonder... :thanks:

I'm at Option 1, with Option 2 around the corner. I'm not fussed about the higher boost threshold with the -5s... I have a 440ci V8 in my Challenger for when I want 'response' LOL

At what level did you run out of puff with the std GTR intercooler?

See Snowman was running a 96mm Trust core.

He swapped back to stock item - didnt lose one iota of power or response on -5s

Swapping was to remove the airflow restriction the larger cooler was creating on the radiator etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...