Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The amount of air that goes through the bottle represents work done, more air means more work. Pressure inside the bottle represents efficiency - the lower the pressure, the more efficiently the work is being done. Different sizes of holes represent turbo sizes and how they affect efficiency. Bigger turbos generate more power than small turbos because of two main factors:

1)they pump more air mass more efficiently by themselves (higher airflow with lower compressor discharge temperatures)

2)they increase engine volumetric efficiency (big turbine housings are less restrictive than small ones)

Thanks for your replies guys, I'll get my head around it one day. Still what I am confused about is that my boost gauge lead is taking the boost pressure right at the intake just before it goes into the engine. So both turbos are having to move 10psi of air through the same size (volume) intake pipe all the way to the boost gage sensor as it enters the engine.

If I get a bigger turbo do I get a bigger pipe? In that case it will be running more flow of air at 10 psi because of a bigger intake pipe.

I UNDERSTAND that a Bigger turbo is capable of moving more air.

With the illustrations of the bottle I am guessing that your mouth is the turbo and the bottle is the intake pipe? Whether bigger or smaller lungs, if they hold the bottle at 10psi and leak out of a little hole... how is it different.

I know I am missing something somewhere.

no you still don't understand. PSI is a measure of PRESSURE. it has nothing to do with any quantity of air. turbo's are measured in lbs/min that is pounds per minute of airflow. wolverine's example was perfect. in that example your mouth is the compressor of the turbo (supplying the air), the body of the bottle is the engine and the bottom where you poke a hole/bigger hole/cut if off is the exhaust side of the turbo.

understand that the turbine housing stuck on the side of an engine is a restriction to exhaust flow. it's literally robbing your engine of some energy (power) and using it to drive the turbine which drives the compressor, the compressor compresses air and stuffs it into your engine. the bigger the compressor the more air it can compress at a given moment and the bigger the turbine the less restriction there is to flow in the exhaust.

the other problem is you are thinking about this in terms of a static measurement. you must include some measurement of time to compare these things. hence turbo's flow potential being measured in lbs/min of air flow. as in how many pounds can this compressor provide in one minute (at a given pressure).

the pipe on your engine has nothing (little) to do with it. change nothing else but your turbo. a standard turbo is still only going to flow X amount of air per min at 10psi and a much bigger turbo is going to provide much more air per minute at 10psi,

and I thought wolverine's was the best explanation so for. :blush:

I am pretty sure that there would be MANY people who don't understand that a larger turbo at the same boost flows more air.

I liked the coke bottle example :)

Wow there are some grossly inaccurate comments in here..

PRESSURE is related to flow, it is actually FORCE x AREA.

The more pressure for a given area, the higher the flow (which is why when you wind the boost up you get more power.. turbo is flowing more air).

Keep the flow the same but decrease the area, and the pressure goes up. Increase the area (LESS RESTRICTION), and you will flow more for same pressure.

Turbos (like engines) are an AIR PUMP, in laymans terms, the bigger the PUMP the more air it will PUMP.

A small pump moves LESS air for a given pressure than a larger pump.

I'm not sure how I can simplify it any further.. suggest howstuffworks.com or some similar site.

I am pretty sure that there would be MANY people who don't understand that a larger turbo at the same boost flows more air.

I liked the coke bottle example :)

not everyone starts off knowing everything : b

Wow there are some grossly inaccurate comments in here..

PRESSURE is related to flow, it is actually FORCE x AREA.

The more pressure for a given area, the higher the flow (which is why when you wind the boost up you get more power.. turbo is flowing more air).

Keep the flow the same but decrease the area, and the pressure goes up. Increase the area (LESS RESTRICTION), and you will flow more for same pressure.

Turbos (like engines) are an AIR PUMP, in laymans terms, the bigger the PUMP the more air it will PUMP.

A small pump moves LESS air for a given pressure than a larger pump.

I'm not sure how I can simplify it any further.. suggest howstuffworks.com or some similar site.

No flow is related to pressure difference. No pressure difference = no flow. Think about a bottle of gas, sitting there with 100psi of gas in it let's say. No flow but 100psi

Now plug it in or open the tap and gas flows out. This is because atmospheric pressure is 14.7psi and the gas bottle has 100psi in it. Large pressure difference so large flow. You can't just say more pressure = more flow. The true statement really would be more pressure difference = more flow (across the same cross sectioned area)

Cheers to all with a positive input, iv ordered injectors and will be running a map ecu when i get it tuned which will be asap. Im not building the auto any stronger yet, the bloke at the shop said they are good for 300kw without dramas, and i didnt go out and buy the to4 it came with a head i got all second hand. He said with my setup ill be able to get 400+ kwatw but with standard driveline its obviously a stupid idea. And i do intend down the track to put 3k stall in it, therefore having a turbo that big will not really disadvantage me. Any ballpark figure of torque at how many revs you think? Iv learnt alot from most of you and thanks for all the input.Im sorry if i upset a few of you through my stupid questions or arrogance or any other reason. I do intend to be an active member on here as this is a great site and awesome info available, especially as most of you have been through the same troubles im working through with my build, so anyone with a grudge please forgive me about the bad start. Thanks very much guys

If u want to get along with everyone dont say things like - its just physics mate, implying everyone else is wrong

I know, i thought it was right, but after learning about the 'flow' side of it all versus pressure, i would'nt hesitate to retract that comment. So for what its worth im sorry

  • Like 1
  • Nope 1

This thread has been very rewarding for all parties. Could do with a little less rage but we're getting there :D. Here is some interesting reading for you Amon,

http://www.automotivearticles.com/Turbo_Selection.shtml

Wow there are some grossly inaccurate comments in here..

PRESSURE is related to flow, it is actually FORCE x AREA.

Having another read over the thread, the most that was said was pressure does not = flow. Which was made reference too quite well.

The science involved in determining flow does include pressure however the relationship is not direct. This is the most that has been conveyed, which is a realistic explanation for those struggling with the concept to begin with. I would say it takes a while to master the concept in total.

Remember blokes are normally interested in cars/books/beer or women and generally only two at a time. EVERYONE likes beer and women so your likely to find most on a CAR forum arent likely to like books that much

**NB - Statement not relevant to Discopotato03 - it is guaranteed he likes atleast 3 of the above, women not too sure :rolleyes:

dude PSI and air flow are two different things flow is the volume of air, psi is the pressure or force how fast the air travels,, think of it this way get a foot pump a bike tyre and a car tyre pump the bike tyre to 20psi count how many pumps it takes then, the car tyre to 20psi , the car tyre has alot more volume than a bike tire right? there fore it will take more pumps to get it to 20psi at the end you still have 20psi pressure in both tyres but the volume of air will be much more , same as a turbo mate you understand?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...