Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

SR = Somethings Rattling

RB = Really Boring

CA = Carnt Arse

FJ - Farking Juicy

VG = Vagina Grabber

VQ = Vagina Quiver

some other makes...

Subaru:

EJ - Everythings Jiggling

Mitsubishi:

4G - 4 cylinders of Gay

Toyota:

1J - One Jerbil (yes the Japs can't spell Gerbil)

2J - Two Jerbils

7M - Sevenmotherfarkingheadgaskets

Suzuki:

G13B - is actually "leet" speak for GLEB which is short for Gay Lebs

Let me know if there are others you want to know about..

so WTF is an MA09ERT? I have one downstairs?

well Duncan my friend that motor code describes homosexuality at it's finest...

MA - March - favourite month of the homos as they get to recover from februarys mardi gras poundings..

09 - is actually 0.9 in reference to the faggy capacity of their fagmobile motors

ERT - Erection Riding Time - Describes their favourite past time..

and you have one downstairs you say? :)

You are most probably correct in saying this. CA18DET motors are Nissan's strongest rated factory motor horsepower-wise. Basically, out of any performance Nissan motor, they can produce the most horsepower without being re-built, somewhere around the 600rwhp figure, and part of this is due to fact that the CA18DET is a cast-iron block, while the SR20DET is an alloy block like that of the RB-series.

LOL I will give you 50 bucks if you can get a stock Ca18 to hold 600rwhp for a week.

well Duncan my friend that motor code describes homosexuality at it's finest...

MA - March - favourite month of the homos as they get to recover from februarys mardi gras poundings..

09 - is actually 0.9 in reference to the faggy capacity of their fagmobile motors

ERT - Erection Riding Time - Describes their favourite past time..

and you have one downstairs you say? :)

well played good sir

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...

SR = Somethings Rattling

RB = Really Boring

CA = Carnt Arse

FJ - Farking Juicy

VG = Vagina Grabber

VQ = Vagina Quiver

some other makes...

Subaru:

EJ - Everythings Jiggling

Mitsubishi:

4G - 4 cylinders of Gay

Toyota:

1J - One Jerbil (yes the Japs can't spell Gerbil)

2J - Two Jerbils

7M - Sevenmotherfarkingheadgaskets

Suzuki:

G13B - is actually "leet" speak for GLEB which is short for Gay Lebs

Let me know if there are others you want to know about..

:laugh:

The RB30ET is based on the RB20ET as seen in some HR31 sedans and wagons. Obviously the 3 litre engine makes more sense for the export market as we have more long Freeways and the like and less tax and shit on higher displacement engines. If you look at the RB30ET though it is basically an RB30E with lower compression and the bolt on gear from the 20ET.

CA20's were fitted to S2 Blueys and weren't that good in stock form (I don't think they have a lot of potential either)

R31 Pintaras as well.

D = double overhead camshaft

E = Electronic FUEL INJECTION (not ignition!)

T = Turbocharged

The number is displacement rounded to the first 2 digits.

The letter prefix simply refers to the family of engines. Ignore it, and what you think it stands for, Nissan engineers probably got a 5 year old to point to 2 letters in the alphabet and went with it for good luck. Insert a myriad of other explanations for it, we aren't going to resolve what has been debated for years within the confines of this thread. In the end, who cares?

Was there anything JDM that used the RB30ET? If not I'd say it was completely Holden's doing. They did buy the rights to the RB30 from Nissan AFAWK.

T actually stands for factory turbocharger.

RB30ET was all holden AFAIK. wasn't the camshaft in the vl RB30 designed by holden as well?

Tommy kaira made a 30DET but that's about it.

and using nissans amazing engine identification system(excluding R and S), Its called FJ20DET :P

don't forget the ca18i, the most awesome engine ever produced by nissan. So awesome it doesn't follow the naming convention or need the twin plug stupidity of the ca20. It's bottom end is factory rates to 600ps but Nissan didn't want to unleash such an engine on the unsuspecting public so limited the power to 80ps with it's sohc rocker snapping awesome sauce head.

I'll see your CA18I and raise you a CA18S.

LOL I will give you 50 bucks if you can get a stock Ca18 to hold 600rwhp for a week.

EFI up here in QLD has had a 550 rwhp stock bottom end ca up and running for years and years, they slapped a 42r or some such thing on it for lols, bashed 30 psi through it, and have been unable to kill it yet.

Fkn useless for anything other than making 500 + rwhp on a dyno though!

post-21318-0-31100100-1311373222_thumb.jpg

LOL I will give you 50 bucks if you can get a stock Ca18 to hold 600rwhp for a week.

+1

The VQ motor Im running seems to be a strong fighter.

VQ25DET, factory unopened motor, throwing more than 300kw at all fours..

  • 2 weeks later...

from my understanding the rb30e was based on the rb20e

holden were going to release the 202 in the VL but the emision laws changed at the last second, holden then spoke to nissan australia and together they designed the motor based on the rb20e, and for marketing reasons, holden went with the mx7 gear box, and turbo, where nissan went with the n/a'd options and rb20 gearbox

toyota engine codes confuse the shit out of me though

nissan;

RB26DET R - ? ~ B - ? ~ 2.6 litre Dual ~ OHC T - turbo

2JZ-GTE - WTF? isnt this a 3 litre? its almost like someone was like "what do we call this?" smash the keyboard "that"

from my understanding the rb30e was based on the rb20e

holden were going to release the 202 in the VL but the emision laws changed at the last second, holden then spoke to nissan australia and together they designed the motor based on the rb20e, and for marketing reasons, holden went with the mx7 gear box, and turbo, where nissan went with the n/a'd options and rb20 gearbox

toyota engine codes confuse the shit out of me though

nissan;

RB26DET R - ? ~ B - ? ~ 2.6 litre Dual ~ OHC T - turbo

2JZ-GTE - WTF? isnt this a 3 litre? its almost like someone was like "what do we call this?" smash the keyboard "that"

JZ = engine code, 2 = 2nd generation of that motor, G = wide angle valve DOHC, T = turbo, E = electronic fuel ejection.

from my understanding the rb30e was based on the rb20e

holden were going to release the 202 in the VL but the emision laws changed at the last second, holden then spoke to nissan australia and together they designed the motor based on the rb20e, and for marketing reasons, holden went with the mx7 gear box, and turbo, where nissan went with the n/a'd options and rb20 gearbox

toyota engine codes confuse the shit out of me though

nissan;

RB26DET R - ? ~ B - ? ~ 2.6 litre Dual ~ OHC T - turbo

2JZ-GTE - WTF? isnt this a 3 litre? its almost like someone was like "what do we call this?" smash the keyboard "that"

Afaik holden didn't help design the RB30E nor did Nissan Australia design it originally. Afaik it was a design from Nissan Japan and possibly not necessarily based on RB20E as they may have been designed at the same time.

Keen to hear anyone's input on this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...