Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah a bit too low with too many breakable aero bits for a tarmac rally car (and most probably illegal in more ways than you could count) but like snowy said, it'd make a kick arse track (circuit) car. here's hoping they don't just crush or museum them all after the series....

Snowy would still run it. To HELL with the rules..... hey Snowy! ;)

:P

Haha - well they have also just released the R35 GT-R RC which is the equivanent of the Lambo Super Alphabet.

over 300kgs lighter than stock and way faster. Thats a much better super cheater Targa car! All yours for $300K

nismo-gtr-rc-004-e1295049106395-540x269.jpg

nismo-gtr-rc-008-e1295049189435-540x297.jpg

nismo-gtr-rc-006-540x359.jpg

Haha - well they have also just released the R35 GT-R RC which is the equivanent of the Lambo Super Alphabet.

over 300kgs lighter than stock and way faster. Thats a much better super cheater Targa car! All yours for $300K

for sure! it's definitely the cheater car to have for all your tarmac rally needs. at $300K it's actually not super expensive either. we know what people spend on other cars to get them "tarmac ready" and no doubt it would be a quick thing. 300kg lighter goes a long way to solving one of it's biggest handicaps which is punishing brakes and tyres so hard. hopefully with that much less weight it would use what it has much better. still won't make it sound half as angry as white's super lambo... and I'm all about the sound...

  • 1 month later...

Bunch of new cars due by the start of 2012 - approx 5 at the moment and more teams looking at getting approval for other makes.

No news on anyone looking towards a GTR yet but will be dependent on the price, god knows i have spent the last 2 years trying to sell a pair of Ford GT3's, which we can't move due to the high $ that manufacturer wants for them.

Should be news in the coming months about 2 new models which i have the pleasure of looking after the marketing pre-launch :thumbsup:

Will keep and eye out, and an ear close to the ground and if i hear something will let you guys know ;)

Edited by Whiplash

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...