Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 804
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

:unsure: , i haven't had my 20 for a while, but from memory they should all stick the same amount out when you sit them in the holes. You can't really mess them up i think as they will bottom out, but seeing as you engine is in you might not be able to see properly

Sussed it I think, there are a couple which will only have about 10mm of thread engaged but most are between 15-20mm and I checked the long ones in the head to see how far they will go in before bottoming out :thumbsup:

Sussed it I think, there are a couple which will only have about 10mm of thread engaged but most are between 15-20mm and I checked the long ones in the head to see how far they will go in before bottoming out :thumbsup:

Sweet, i'm still hunting down bits and pieces for my engine. Am changing builders for the engine, mate had some things happen that havent really impressed me with that workshop. Gona go back to old faithful i think

My very first car, bought with the money i've been saving. I think it's a pretty good car to learn on since i'm 17 haha :D, new front mount and boost gauge going in at the end of the month. :)

Looks nice, needs moar pics

Tidy! If anyone wants a searchable pdf copy of the 32 gtr workshop manual.. you can find it at the following link for a few days (until I need the space back :) ).

http://members.iinet.net.au/~psyko/car/gtr_32_service_manual_searchable.pdf

RB 20 engines make me angry. Made for Japanese people with small hands :(

Bah ridonkulous! Once you pull half the shit out of the bay you don't need and go high mount, you have enough room in there to dance around

I had 310hp with boost spike, unopened motor, gtr inj, ems and 6boobs mani, lasted 5yrs before i pulled it out for teh restoration. The 25 conversion is up to you really if you feel like you wana go that way. My old turbo setup is going onto a 25 in a 31. I was going to go down a stroked 25 route but changed my mind for the 26/30 which would have cost the same.

The 20 is a great base to play with they just love to rev

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
    • Here's Logans Silvia with R32 Drivetrain, mine will be slightly lower (more angle). He was constantly blowing the RH axles at around 16deg. I want to avoid this.    
×
×
  • Create New...