Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Aeromotive stealth

Just got mine $240 from ebay, did free shipping cos I bought it without bidding on Ebay

340lph @ 40psi and 13.5V

I was gonna take some pics of the install but it looks similar in dimentions to a walbro. Chances are I wont be able to do it this weekend either

Edited by sucram

Yea but why would you run intank, increases the chance of something going wrong, as well as reduced capacity, and more effort ;)

Wut?

I've been running my 044 like that for years now, so has my mate and that single, in-tank 044 is supporting well over 500awhp.

IMO, the 044 in-tank with a stock-type sock filter setup is way better than the 040 with integral pickup, and the 044 flows more.

Edited by bubba

Aeromotive stealth

Just got mine $240 from ebay, did free shipping cos I bought it without bidding on Ebay

340lph @ 40psi and 13.5V

I was gonna take some pics of the install but it looks similar in dimentions to a walbro. Chances are I wont be able to do it this weekend either

that looks like a good pump @ 340lph :)

have u fitted it as yet & are the dimensions similar to that of the oem gtr pump?

there are 3 versions of the 'stealth' so which is the right pump? would it be the 'centre inlet', 'offset inlet' or 'offset inlet/inline'

a few other q's:

1. stevo - the A1000 has serious flow (800lph @ 40psi), do u know if it fits in the tank of an r32?

2. pierburg pumps have also been recommended, do they flow as much as the aeromotive pumps as i cannot locate a website representing pierburg pumps?

3. the 'stealth' is rated @ 340lph on 40psi, what fuel pressure would the gtr run at high rpm/load? reason i ask, flow drops significantly @ 250lph on 75psi (as per attached flow chart) whereas the bosch 044 flows 200lph @ 5bar = 72.5psi

post-8728-0-88042900-1302755310_thumb.jpg

Marko, fuel pressure isn't rpm dependant, it boost dependant. Our systems are 3bar systems, if you're then running 2bar of boost then the fuel pressure will be 5bar at full boost :thumbsup:

Marko, fuel pressure isn't rpm dependant, it boost dependant. Our systems are 3bar systems, if you're then running 2bar of boost then the fuel pressure will be 5bar at full boost :thumbsup:

ok.

so my calculations should be based on something closer to 5bar fuel pressure as im running 21psi

My calculations are based on 5bar moving forward & here are my options...

1. Bosch 044: 200lph @ 5bar (more info: http://www.bosch.com.au/content/language1/downloads/fuelpumps.pdf)

2. Pierburg E3L series (700228510): 330lph @ 5bar (more info http://www.compsystems.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=106:pierburgefp&catid=2:ecu&Itemid=14)

3. Aeromotive A1000: 700lph @ 5bar (more info: http://aeromotiveinc.com/products-page/fuel-pumps/11101-a1000-fuel-pump/)

4. Aeromotive Stealth: 250lph @ 5bar (more info: http://aeromotiveinc.com/products-page/fuel-pumps/11140-340-stealth-fuel-pump-center-inlet/)

My concern with the aeromotive A1000 is if i can make it fit in the oem fuel pump cradle as it looks massivein comparison to the other pumps, there no dimensions available...

Pierburg flows 66% more than my 044 which is awesome...will the pierburg support 450awkw?

what are peoples thoughts?

thanks in advance :)

The Pierburg is very long and thin, like two Walbro's end to end.

The A1000 is around 3.5 inches round and 6 inches long as I remember. It can be mounted intank apparently but it is single speed, there are similar pumps around with variable speed to stop the fuel heating so much. These require -8 fittings and hoses at least for their rated output apparently.

Best and cheapest option is twin Walbro's cost and price wise, may not be the most reliable though but thats what I went for.

Wut?

I've been running my 044 like that for years now, so has my mate and that single, in-tank 044 is supporting well over 500awhp.

IMO, the 044 in-tank with a stock-type sock filter setup is way better than the 040 with integral pickup, and the 044 flows more.

Designed as an external pump. Not saying it won't be fine, just saying it isn't what it was designed for :)

Designed as an external pump. Not saying it won't be fine, just saying it isn't what it was designed for :)

So? An 044 internal is fine, I use one and control it with Vipec. Stop posting crap.

Designed as an external pump. Not saying it won't be fine, just saying it isn't what it was designed for :)

The 044 doesn't have an open end like the 023 and 040....so you clamp a sock on the bottom of the pump and solve the problem.

how did u set up your twin walbro's? any pics?

The M35 pump is similar to the 350z, it sits under the rear seat. One Walbro and -6 line for each rail running ID1000's, non return valves before the reg should let me know if one pump fails so as not to run lean.

post-63525-0-56664100-1302816785_thumb.jpg

post-63525-0-64411000-1302817351_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Increasing overlap will bring the torque down earlier (and make your idle sound sick lol). Worth a shot (if you dyno time) to experience a bit (providing you are confident your valves won't kiss your pistons). Is to just take off 5 degrees across the boosted area of the map, and then retard the exhaust cam let's say, 3 degrees at a time and then overlay all the runs with VCT on all the way and VCT off as soon as you make positive pressure. Ideally you would have a total of 6x overlays to looks at 0 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve 0 exhaust & VCT on all the way -5 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -5 exhaust & VCT on all the way -10 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -10 exhaust & VCT on all the way Just leave your O2 wideband closed loop on for all of the boost area & RPM, and hopefully there isn't too much fuel correction needed and the Haltech is fast enough to compensate (I do this, then apply the correction to the main table). Getting that overlay data should give you a good indication of what to aim for.
    • So, my main limitation here is that the car does not have an oil pressure sensor by default, just a switch. As part of my tune I bought an oil pressure sensor upgrade so I now have access to oil pressure levels and logging rather than just the boolean behaviour of the switch but this means I need to use the tuning app to display this value. So, this rules out using any other app on the iPad. The app will also flash when pressure drops which is a nice feature. I have replaced the centre screen with an Android one, which is awesome for Android Auto, but I think it might be too far away and out of my line of sight. I might add some gauges to it this weekend and just see. I guess if its just temp and oil pressure I can make them massive! 🤣  
    • This is what the look like normally. Except we only got the 2 doors locally
    • Back pressure is not really a function of the exhaust itself, but the turbine/housing. So the question/point remains valid. I would be fitting an EMAP tapping point and seeing what is going on in the exhaust manifold before committing to throwing boost at it. Flow. No intercooler is actually rated for continuous operation at any power level wrt temperatures, as they are no actually capable of shifting the required amounts of heat on a continuous basis. They get hot during a pul, then dump some of that heat into the external air (and some back into the internal air) during off load moments/periods). You probaby do need a bigger core, given the power level you're already at is somewhat above the "rating" of the cooler. Put pressure tapping points either side of the core (which possibly you already have, if you have a boost source near the compressor outlet and tapping near the throttle for existing purposes) and report on delta P across the core.   I haven't done the mass flow calculation to see where you would be sitting on the compressor map at the ~450is rwkW level we're talking here, but if you look just at the PR you're running at, which is ~2.8-2.9, then you have a really really wide swath of the compressor map to run in, and so long as you were making between about 45-75 lb/min of flow, you should have really good comp efficiency, with the ideal being betweem 55 and 65. I can't see the need to shift drastically on the map to get better results.
    • Welcome 🙂 The ER34 wheels and slight lowering suit the R33 sedan really well. I'm firmly in the 'keep it stock, at least on the outside' camp.
×
×
  • Create New...