Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys and girls,

I have a completely stock 97 R33 Gtst Series 2, it has 82000Km's on it. Had it on the Dyno the other week because i have had some fuel economy issue. Just though i would post up the graph and get any comments, thoughts, opinions.

Just though some of you guys might be curious.

post-76634-0-75366800-1302782158_thumb.jpg

Ps. i know there is a dyno section but i was after some comments so i though i would post it here.

Cheers,

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/
Share on other sites

It's quite lean for a stock ECU.

Rare to see one @ 12:1 around peak torque. I'd almost be inclined to say your fuel pump is perhaps on the way out.

Otherwise though it's not unsafe, and totally fine/to be expected in terms of result.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5762332
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

The tuner also mentioned that there was an issue with the o2 sensor as he said it was pumping in way to much fuel under certain loads (Sory cant remember where) around 30% more. The o2 sensor itself seemed to be in ok condidtion so he suspected a wiring issue or something along those lines for it to be misreading.

Other than that he seemed to be happy with it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5762585
Share on other sites

Yeah could be anything in the fuel system

Just get the pressure checked, filter swapped and then have a look.

Might be nothing, but 12:1 is just a tad leaner than the stock ECU normally behaves so it might not even be a problem as every car and ECU does respond a bit different

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5763015
Share on other sites

NisMoiddddddddd looks fine to me, I still had the wb O2 on my GTS-t when I returned her back to stock and noted the A/F. I played with the CAS +2/3 degrees and noticed it ran a tad leaner than usual on full load.

Economy, go replace your stock O2.

Who's the dyno operator? O2 is only for cruise when the plenum is -ve pressure. On load, O2 does nothing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5763127
Share on other sites

Ye it looks fine to me too dude. I never said it was bad.

Just a little leaner @ 4500-4800 than you'd expect. But by no means is it unsafe how it currently is and would be fine to use. Its perhaps just a sigh something might be needing attention. That is all.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5763179
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feed back guys, dyno was done at unigroup.

First import, still learning about all of these things. didnt add this before but he seemed to think that the ecu was reading the o2 sensor wrong, it was pumping in fuel even though it was getting plenty. I know i keep brining o2 sensor up but he said it will more than likely be the issue behind the economy issues (i am struggleing to get to 300 city driving and even cruising on the highway i am bearly making 400km to a tank, that was on a good week).

I will also have a chat to him about the fuel pump now that you have bought it up, and i assume you say that purely bassed on it not pumping enough fuel through the system, hence running lean.

Apologies for lack of understanding but im still learning learn.

Regards,

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5763358
Share on other sites

The main thing is, it goes lean [but not engine destroying lean, just leaner than you want it to be] when you increase the revs. It is not lean until you get up in the range. This means that it passes enough fuel for down low but leans off up high = a lazy pump or a clogged filter.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5764866
Share on other sites

Ye it looks fine to me too dude. I never said it was bad.

Just a little leaner @ 4500-4800 than you'd expect. But by no means is it unsafe how it currently is and would be fine to use. Its perhaps just a sigh something might be needing attention. That is all.

Id agree with that. Its better to be safe than sorrry.. bad batch of fuel or a stupidly hot day perhaps? Is that that area of the stock ECU where it pulls a bit of timing too?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360948-dyno-graph/#findComment-5765420
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...