Jump to content
SAU Community

S A U N S W - Texi, Skids On Sunday, 12Th June 2011


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have (possibly) faxed my form through. Sorry to whoever is on the receiving end... the work fax decided to eat the page, forcing me to abort and play tug of war instead. I then resent it and it decided that my daily maximum page quota should be the grand total of "one", and it just sent the page without feeding the second one through. I had to fax the second page seperately... so... enjoy? =-]

Also... it's unclear to me from the above posts... is an L2NS CAMS licence sufficient for this event?

I have (possibly) faxed my form through. Sorry to whoever is on the receiving end... the work fax decided to eat the page, forcing me to abort and play tug of war instead. I then resent it and it decided that my daily maximum page quota should be the grand total of "one", and it just sent the page without feeding the second one through. I had to fax the second page seperately... so... enjoy? =-]

Also... it's unclear to me from the above posts... is an L2NS CAMS licence sufficient for this event?

Hey mate,

Nothing has come through yet, if you can try and send it again to be safe that would be great.

Hey mate,

Nothing has come through yet, if you can try and send it again to be safe that would be great.

Right. I've resent it today. I could be mistaken, but I think I heard a voice on the other end (very noisy printer room) yesterday and today when I resent it.

Still.. fax transmission log says two pages went through OK.

So... L2NS is acceptable? Anyone?

if anyone needs a fire extinguisher for texi their 2 for 1 at super cheap!!

5880_super.jpg

I also have one for sale (or possibly hire if you have a ratchet for the front seat bolts) that I will bring on the day.

Right. I've resent it today. I could be mistaken, but I think I heard a voice on the other end (very noisy printer room) yesterday and today when I resent it.

Still.. fax transmission log says two pages went through OK.

So... L2NS is acceptable? Anyone?

Yep, L2NS is fine, but you'll need to have an L2S if you want to do any track days, so it's better off just to get that.

dammit.. i got defected for having a fire extinguisher in my car a few days ago!

They could only defect you for the location of it or it not being secured, as they're a requirement in government vehicles

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...