Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i would think of running both, i wouldn't like to rely on just one - especially widebands

wonder what the GM (saab etc) cars do in the event of the content sensor failing... maybe just really detuned, it wouldn't actually matter

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What if the E85 sensor packs it in?

What if a massive comet comes from outer space and crashes into earth?

As long as you change the sensor out every 100,000k or 50k if you are paranoid, then you will be fine. You could also argue about the e85 sensor and changing it out, but at $500 a pop?, hmm.

What if the fuel pump FAILS!

DANGER TO MANIFOLD

Or you could save yourself the hassle and buy the V500 Ecu instead. It's pretty much the same price as the vipec/haltech/Autronic etc but does so much more. That's the beauty of running multi-controllers.

Then you don't need the E85 sensor, you just need a wideband o2 which are approx $125-$150

That might work with an RB but VQ25det is a different kettle.

I havent needed to adjust my map as the Caltex eflex has been nothing but consistent so far, no matter what servo I fill at. I just run a simple wideband and will trim the tune if needed using the injector size adjustment on my Emanage Ultimate.

That might work with an RB but VQ25det is a different kettle.

I havent needed to adjust my map as the Caltex eflex has been nothing but consistent so far, no matter what servo I fill at. I just run a simple wideband and will trim the tune if needed using the injector size adjustment on my Emanage Ultimate.

Why is the VQ25DET a different kettle? It's an engine.

It's good to be able to make those adjustments yourself but what about the people who don't know what they are doing? With the appropriate ECU, it does it for you

i would think of running both, i wouldn't like to rely on just one - especially widebands

wonder what the GM (saab etc) cars do in the event of the content sensor failing... maybe just really detuned, it wouldn't actually matter

Probably no worse to an oxygen sensor or air flow meter detoriating - car simply won't run at optimum performance. I don't think it's much of a safety issue. As we've discussed earlier in the thread, the varying contents of ethanol won't put the car into danger territory unless you're tuned on a knife edge...and factory cars certainly aren't. The factory fitted E85 ECUs probably monitor both AFR and E content to make sure the mix is spot on...AFR might be a backup in case of E sensor failing, or who knows, car may go into limp mode.

Ethanol sensor might be expensive, well, $500 every 50,000km (conservative estimate here) I can easily live with...and changing it over for another one would be no harder than doing your fuel filter.

wideband is more useful than ethanol sensor imo, because with wideband you can adjust the tune perfectly to suit, where as with ethanol sensor you are only guessing how much to adjust it by.

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

if you have it tuned for 14.7 on petrol and throw in e85 its not gonna stay at 14.7, it'll be down to around 11:1. easiest way is to always leave the wideband set to petrol and tune to the same afr's as you would for petrol.

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

I spoke to the guy at techedge about this. The sensor reads a lambda and the converts it back. On my wideband if you want to run a E85 corrected AFR then you just have to change a few settings.. Easy as... OR look at the lambda reading.

I spoke to the guy at techedge about this. The sensor reads a lambda and the converts it back. On my wideband if you want to run a E85 corrected AFR then you just have to change a few settings.. Easy as... OR look at the lambda reading.

Which TechEdge unit do you have?

I have the 2J1...

if you have it tuned for 14.7 on petrol and throw in e85 its not gonna stay at 14.7, it'll be down to around 11:1. easiest way is to always leave the wideband set to petrol and tune to the same afr's as you would for petrol.

Wouldnt it go the otherway? being that there is only 15% Gasoline so would show something like 18:1? or am i thinking about it wrong

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

You are forgetting its not straight ethanol.

I leave mine on petrol afr's and get it tuned for around 12:1 at WOT that gives me a little play room still incase Caltex change their brew. (and that way I never get confused converting from lambda.)

stoich for ethanol is 9:1, and gasoline is 14.7:1. Say if your using a gasoline wideband, and running ethanol, then you're going to still read 14.7

So I'm quite confused, unless I'm missing something here?

If not another solution is to run 2x types of wideband sensors, 1x ethanol, 1x gasoline.

yeah but if you change the fuel the relative afr is going to be out, it doesn't matter what the number is, it just matters that you realise it has changed and can tune it to suit.

most sensors read lambda anyway and convert it

Exactly, there should be a Lambda table and it will trim/add fuel as required to reach the target lambda.

A failsafe solution is to use a GM flex fuel sensor 0-5v analogue input to detect the amount of Ethanol in the brew and trim/adjust the E85 map to suit and then look into having a switchable map based on less than x% ethanol for a hybrid map/petrol map.

E85 is too inconstant for my liking to be used everyday unless the servo is consistent with their brew.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...