Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you need to add tune cost to that. i know that GT were $1100 base price for complete nistune job.

650 is only instaled. it wont run like that so you then have to instal it and tow it to a workshop then have them tune it wich will be min $300 so theres almost your 1100 for gt.

im pretty sure boost is cheaper than that but power fcs are cheap and they come with a base map and do all the things you need.

nistune is the cheapest way you will get around it but for the price and added benifits of a power fc it would have to be the next cheapest option.

if you find other cheaper ecus like link you will need to find a tuner that will be happy to tune with it. everyone tunes power fcs.

If you plug in a pfc it won't run out of the box if your running bigger inj's or differnent afm etc. The nistune runs a stock map (same as pfc), so once installed it will run like a standard ecu... unless there is a wiring change for z32/rb20 ecu (pretty shure there isn't. just search it) for your application.

Whoever you get to install the nistune or tuner should be able to make the required changes for inj and afm etc to the ecu off the car, so you can drive the car in to get tuned.

But go with what your tuner is happy with..

you need to add tune cost to that. i know that GT were $1100 base price for complete nistune job.

650 is only instaled. it wont run like that so you then have to instal it and tow it to a workshop then have them tune it wich will be min $300 so theres almost your 1100 for gt.

im pretty sure boost is cheaper than that but power fcs are cheap and they come with a base map and do all the things you need.

nistune is the cheapest way you will get around it but for the price and added benifits of a power fc it would have to be the next cheapest option.

if you find other cheaper ecus like link you will need to find a tuner that will be happy to tune with it. everyone tunes power fcs.

If you plug in a pfc it won't run out of the box if your running bigger inj's or differnent afm etc. The nistune runs a stock map (same as pfc), so once installed it will run like a standard ecu... unless there is a wiring change for z32/rb20 ecu (pretty shure there isn't. just search it) for your application.

Whoever you get to install the nistune or tuner should be able to make the required changes for inj and afm etc to the ecu off the car, so you can drive the car in to get tuned.

But go with what your tuner is happy with..

If you plug in a pfc it won't run out of the box if your running bigger inj's or differnent afm etc. The nistune runs a stock map (same as pfc), so once installed it will run like a standard ecu... unless there is a wiring change for z32/rb20 ecu (pretty shure there isn't. just search it) for your application.

Whoever you get to install the nistune or tuner should be able to make the required changes for inj and afm etc to the ecu off the car, so you can drive the car in to get tuned.

But go with what your tuner is happy with..

If you're not a complete tard you should be able to setup your PFC or nistune to suit your injectors and AFM and limp it to the tuners. I wouldn't drive it to work for 2 weeks but...

also +1 go with what ever your tuner likes best, because at the end of the day, any ECU is only as good as it's tuner.

If you plug in a pfc it won't run out of the box if your running bigger inj's or differnent afm etc.

takes about 2 minutes to set it up to run. has z32 and vh41/q45 afm as a option, then set the injectors. if i can do it, your dog can do it.

and i drove my car for 2 weeks like this as my daily. nothing over 5k but still did it with no harm done. when i scaled the injectors, they "should" of been set to 50% but i left them at around 65% to be on the safe side. you can leave latency time as is to just get it from a to b

takes about 2 minutes to set it up to run. has z32 and vh41/q45 afm as a option, then set the injectors. if i can do it, your dog can do it.

and i drove my car for 2 weeks like this as my daily. nothing over 5k but still did it with no harm done. when i scaled the injectors, they "should" of been set to 50% but i left them at around 65% to be on the safe side. you can leave latency time as is to just get it from a to b

It's a very similar process to set up the nistune. Just as easy. :nyaanyaa:

Nistune is as easy as:

1: Receive

2: Plug in

3: Drive just like standard :)

And after that its all down to aftermarket bits/ tuning.

Yes... but there is some changes that need to be made in order to run larger injectors or afm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...