Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just after some info on these. As iv got a set. And dont know weather to use them or sell them off for a t04z.

Iv got the inturnally gated set, that sits in the stock looking position.

What are some good supporting mods?? ie cams and stuff.

Cheers

James.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365731-twin-hks-gt2835s/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine are the bolt on standard position ones. So they are a bit smaller than he high mount kit. I think 0.6 front and 0.640rear.

Wanna push them high 300's plus. Got the engine and Haltech ready for support. Now turtle things like cam size injector etc.

Its gonna be a dog to drive. But its not going to be a daily.

Come on mate your talking about getting 2 turbos capable of 450-500rwkw setup and you cant be bothered having a 2 second look at hks site for the different sizes. Either do some serious research or just walk into a quality performance joint and tell them how much power you want and see if you can afford it.

The HKS GTRS makes about 250rwkw on a well setup RB25.

The HKS 2835 Pro S makes about 270rwkw on a well setup RB25.

So yes they are bigger.

They will be one of the laggiest ways to make high 300's.

Mine are the bolt on standard position ones. So they are a bit smaller than he high mount kit. I think 0.6 front and 0.640rear.

Wanna push them high 300's plus. Got the engine and Haltech ready for support. Now turtle things like cam size injector etc.

Its gonna be a dog to drive. But its not going to be a daily.

"push" them to high 300's? They wont even be awake flowing that much! Why not get a set of turbo's suited to you goal? It will make for a much nicer (and quicker) car!

There is quite a range of HKS spec turbos called GT2835 but the chief thing to remembe is that they are based on a GT30 turbine so the 28 part is marketing slight for what is actually a GT3071R turbo , just ones with cropped turbines .

Long story short they came with GT28 or GT30 based turbine housings and either could have T25 or T3 flanges .

The ones you have would be the low mount GT28 0.64 A/R RB26 based turbine housing version bored out to suit the cropped GT30 turbine .

These are from memory the largest low mount IW HKS spec Garrett ball bearing turbos used as parallel twins on RB26 heads . I would not expect these turbos to be what you'd call responsive given that they are 250+ Kw capable units on their own . I believe they use the same turbine housing castings as RB26 style GT2530's and many people don't even consider 2530s to be responsive turbos on std capacity RB26's .

The bottom line is that you cannot have it both ways with turbochargers and when you have an engine car combination that needs turbo boost to make healthy torque getting some boost in early makes all the difference .

An RB26 is a short stroke short rod medium bore low compression ratio inline six . It is designed to rev and equipt to make good power for the capacity but not at low or what most consider "normal" engine revs . We know its entirely possible to make a lot more power than Nissan did standard with these engins but increasing the state of tune with larger turbochargers almost always pushes the onset of boost higher up the engines rev range . The higher up it is the less accessible it becomes when trying to drive these cars "normally" .

I personally wouldn't have anything larger than 2530s on on a GTR even a dual purepose street/club car . For pure street it would be GTSSs and enjoy the fact that you can have a GTR with good road squirt but without revving the piss bags out of it all the time .

In my book you 2835s are drag race turbos and for a pure quarter mile car not a bad starting point .

I think they are impractical for much else but thats just my conservative view .

A .

pointless post from me but be sure to note there is twin 2835 with internal gate and external gate setups

twin 2835s regardless like disco says is stupid

its a cropped GT30 setup basically

and who runs twin GT30s????

imho for the original poster the T04Z would probably provide much more linear response vs twin that large

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...