Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah mate , nothing wrong with turbo, just needs a scrub. The whole point is i have an r34 gtr with around $35k worth of parts in the engine and supporting hardware.

The car this turbo will go onto cost $500. Sure i could spend 1500 to 2000 on a new turbo for awesome 'response' which is all the rage at th moment. That will defeat the purpose though of having a cheap daily hack.

This is the sort of thing i do in my spare time, i have all the other parts i need to do the job. It will be oh so sweet when i blow the doors off the average r33.

i dont get it?

BNR34 + $35k in parts doesnt sound cheap

BNR34 would be able to blow doors off average R33 without a stupid turbocharger like that

not worried about reliability on your engine using this turbo?

and on a 2.6L it is really way too big

sell it or throw it out and at least get something pre this era, T04Z if you must have something big

definately is better spec but as he said its a $500 sigma and he already has the turbo and other bits to use so he just wants to do it for shits n giggles!

Thats the impression i get from this thread.

* a 2.6 astron revs to around 5000 rpm, the turbo wont be oversped.

*im 30 yrs old and have been playing around with turbocharged cars since a lot of you guys were still on the tit! Hey you probably still are.....

*Has anyone here ever had any experienc with an old turbocharged 2.6 sigma or such? I think some of the knockers would be surprised with what they are capable of with the limited tech. available.

The car this turbo will go onto cost $500. Sure i could spend 1500 to 2000 on a new turbo for awesome 'response' which is all the rage at th moment. That will defeat the purpose though of having a cheap daily hack.

This is the sort of thing i do in my spare time, i have all the other parts i need to do the job. It will be oh so sweet when i blow the doors off the average r33.

Want to see photos of MY 2.6 Sigma? Mine originally cost $150, $25k later, I can tell you, its still a piece of shit. HKS 3037 turbo, steam pipe manifolds, enormous cams, special offset pistons, C4 auto, big stall, surge take fuel setup, TR injection and an EMS. Originally we had a shitter with a free C4 and a free VL's turbo. After lots of "its only $500 bucks" here and there, it ended up as it is today.

All that work, and I blitzed it with my own hair dressers NX Coupe. The NX had a FACTORY STANDARD SR20DET including 2 inch exhaust, factory airbox and paper filter, 7psi and 120fwkw.

The Sigma still sits in my aunts garage, and I refuse to finish it. I leave it to my older (older than you) and much dumber brother. Its his problem now, and I have to continually convince him of not spending more money on it, in a feeble effort to save face to an originally 'good idea'.

You can call me a prick if you want, you can also talk about your age like it makes a difference, yet as far as I am concerned I am doing you one hell of a favor in advising you to quit while your ahead. A sigma is not an old falcon with a 4 litre motor. Its not even an old corolla..... Its a bloody sigma, with a magna motor.... It WILL cost you more than 5 grand to build. My turbo NX coupe costed me under 6, and I sold it for 7.

Take it as a grain of salt, as I'm sure you will. This is SOLID EXPERIENCED advice.

post-43588-0-37079700-1307269254_thumb.jpg

Further more, I will bring attention to the fact you will need:

A manifold

A waste gate

Exhaust system

Fuel pump setup

Intercooler and plumbing

Then have you considered management? Or were you going to force the carby? If you do, you will need to use a boosted application carb which will need to be boxed into the intake plumbing so it has equalized pressure OR you will need to have a suck through setup which will have your charge air run through the front of your turbo. Then you need to consider adequate jetting of the carb to accommodate.

If you were planning on using Magna injection, make note that the throttle body points the wrong way and your injectors are just big enough for the original motor. So you will need to cut off and move the TB and get a set of bigger injectors. You will also need a proper ECU to run it for you and will be hard pressed to utilise the stock item plus piggy back. The stock item shits itself with a pod filter and exhaust on a magna.

Once you realise this and that part of your concoction havent worked as planned, you will start to see things add up.

The original plan for mine was a backyard manifold manifold and crossover pipe.. The rest is history.

Like said earlier i have all the parts i need. Ive done exactly the same thing with a swb pajero except it runs an evo 6 turbo. Other parts i used were; evo 7 intercooler and cat converter, eco 8 mr bov, ts magna efi manifold, siemens 650cc injectors, sx fuel pressure regulator, surge tank with turbo supra in-tank pump fitted inside the surge tank, wolf v500 ecu, 3 inch exhaust with seperate wg pipe, rv4 galant waste spark coils, ts magna distributor, wrx inlet pipe, vr4 galant airbox plus whatever else i cant think of.

Everything was fabricated by me in my shed ie exh manifold, intercooler piping, surge tank, throttle body and thermostat relocation, inlet tract etc. I finished that 2 years ago and sold it to a mate 12 months ago without a problem.

Like i said its a hobby for me. I picked up all the parts for next to nothingor they came from previous half cuts or cars ive owned over the years and get all consumables from work so it costs me next to nothing. I get a kick out o fputting

things together out of parts laying around.

My age may not make a difference to anyone, just trying to point out im not a 15 year old time waster with no idea. The wole thing will owe me $2500 including rego not 25grand and counting. But thanks for the advice and opinions, im not afraid of some constructive criticism.

Once you have it running PM me with a link to your works, I will be interested to compare it to my own.

The motors seem to spool turbos very easily and early in the rev range, yet make piss weak power.. It will act like it has a much smaller turbo than it does.

GL

no worries, not sure how long it will take. The pajero with evo 6 turbo makes boost straight away but hasnt been tuned fully yet. We will only run 10 psi. It made 152 hp at rear wheels on 5psi when we were getting it tuned 18 months ago and ran out of time. Ill take some pics of the setup if interested. should see him next weekend.

I've got noting against the backyard turbo effort with free/cheap parts but can't help but think that that turbo which has a larger ex housing and wheel than the comp housing and wheel is going to be a pig of a thing on the astron donk.

turbos are cheap these days. there is no need to spend $2500 for a turbo for your banger. I reckon with $200 in your hand you could find something really good. a turbo that made 152hp in conjunction with a supercharger on a 2 stroke diesel that only spun to 2,500rpm is not going to do the business on a 4 stroke petrol engine running to 5,000rpm.

for the sake of a couple bucks by something a bit better. even something like the evo turbo you used previously would be a much better option.

Used evo turbos go for as little as 300, I bought the UPGRADED titanium version for my last evo for just $450.

I do recomend something larger for the astron though.. Something you would expect to be laggy on a 2L 4.

With the 'milder' of the cams I run in my Astron 2 my 3037 has full boost almost off the stall (2500), but only makes 150kw..... LOL

Looks like you've raided an archeological dig. What you have there is somewhat reminiscent of the paleoarchean era (circa 3.5 billion years ago; the average 0-100 time for a Mitsubishi Sigma). I recommend the Museum of Natural History in Oxford should you wish to attempt reconditioning it (highly recommended, as the CHRA has most likely become one with Gaia aka Mother Earth). Here's a more recent example from the triassic period - the similarities in housing design are striking to say the least:

fossnail.jpg

Central-Tennessee-snail-fossil.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...