Jump to content
SAU Community

What to do with R32 GTST RB20DET to get it into the low 12s in the 1/4 mile (400m)


Recommended Posts

Hey neil_se and -Joel-, fundamently to get a fwd off the line well u need slicks due to obvious traction problems, u guys have a clear advantage over us obviously due to the car being rwd!

BTW my car weighs 1100 kg, a little lighter that an s13 but not much!

But back on to topic, i think it'd be nice to build a serious ca to run those times down the quarter, but i don't think u'll do it with the low quality imprts we inherentily get. Just in general the silvia being an older car it will have a few miles on it and hence be i porrere condition, i.e trying to obtain 12's may be a task without blowing up the motor or rebuilding urs. If u were to rebuild urs, and go the aftermarket ecu, fmic, 3inch exhaust, VL T3, Custom manifold and 550cc injectors, then u'd definately have a very quick car able of the times u want.

However the whole hassel of pulling the motor out and putting it back in which may make u think hey why not throw the rb in! Being a 6 the motor itself may be happier supporting similar powerr due to the fact that the same power only will be needed however it is spred of 6 cyl rather than 4 making it easier for u to mod it and not blow it up. Do the same mods to it as the ca, probably a t4 rather than t3 and it'll be a formidable street car!

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So who really gives a toss!!!

So how do I run 12's?

You tell 'em tiger.... my thoughts are that i may be close to a high 11 if i play with susp and tyres, something im not too keen on doing. Tyres are ok, but i like my susp too much to change just to get better 1/4 times.

I have a 2nd hand TD06-20g, HKS cooler, GTR Injectors, clutch, re-mapped ECU, and before i venture onto Calder ill have cam gears, GTR cams and most likely some BF Goodrich Drag radials on 16" R32 GTR rear rims / or just some D01J Type R 17s. So power and tyre wise i should be good for a low 12, maybe a high 11, but who knows how suitable my susp and driving will be.

What i need is someone telling me rough time difference between running 16" BF Goodrish drag radials on lightweight GTR rims, and 17" D01Js on lightweight 17s, both rubber 235 or 245 wide....0.5second difference....0.2, none at all?

You tell 'em tiger.... my thoughts are that i may be close to a high 11 if i play with susp and tyres, something im not too keen on doing. Tyres are ok, but i like my susp too much to change just to get better 1/4 times.

I have a 2nd hand TD06-20g, HKS cooler, GTR Injectors, clutch, re-mapped ECU, and before i venture onto Calder ill have cam gears, GTR cams and most likely some BF Goodrich Drag radials on 16" R32 GTR rear rims / or just some D01J Type R 17s.  So power and tyre wise i should be good for a low 12, maybe a high 11, but who knows how suitable my susp and driving will be.

What i need is someone telling me rough time difference between running 16" BF Goodrish drag radials on lightweight GTR rims, and 17" D01Js on lightweight 17s, both rubber 235 or 245 wide....0.5second difference....0.2, none at all?

Sounds like you are going to have a well sorted package there Roy

I would say the BF Drag radials will give you a much better 60ft time than even the best R rated semi-slicks. Don't know how much exactly, as I have never seen or heard of the same car running back to back on differant rubber

My plan is for about 220-230rwkw, with as much mid-range as possible. I dont want to change suspension to a drag type setup, as thats cheating in my books - run it they way you drive it everyday - hopefully it will be enough to run a 12

What type of gearbox/diff are you running?

What type of gearbox/diff are you running?

Standard Engine - Check :(

Standard Gearbox - Check :)

Standard Diff - Check :) Still hasnt started to open wheel, mayeb because i dont do burnouts etc

Have a 6 puck single plate clutch.

... and something my car lacks is midrange, so im relying on bucket loads of top end. The mid range situation is the reason im going for cam gears and cam change. I dont even know how much power im making, other then it makes me smile :)

Standard Engine - Check :(  

Standard Gearbox - Check :)  

Standard Diff - Check :)  Still hasnt started to open wheel, mayeb because i dont do burnouts etc

Have a 6 puck single plate clutch.

... and something my car lacks is midrange, so im relying on bucket loads of top end.  The mid range situation is the reason im going for cam gears and cam change. I dont even know how much power im making, other then it makes me smile :)

So you did you decided to run those GTR cams Roy? I'm thinking seriously on the GTR's after we spoke over pm a few days ago... They should wake up my GT25R a fair amount (that turbo is the reason I'm not buying the cams until winter). Did you decide to use them with just GTR springs or the whole solid works?

I'd imagine with the 20 in my car, I should be about the same weight as you are... or slightly less. Hopefully I can pull the same low 12's high 11's that you might run (Hybrid FMIC, 3-4" tapered GReddy TR2 exhaust, no cat, MKIV fuel pump, 550cc S5 inj, K&N pod filter, S-AFC 5 knob, and RB25 MAF). I still might need some more control over the engine... not sure though.

Sounds like you are going to have a well sorted package there Roy

I would say the BF Drag radials will give you a much better 60ft time than even the best R rated semi-slicks. Don't know how much exactly, as I have never seen or heard of the same car running back to back on different rubber

My plan is for about 220-230rwkw, with as much mid-range as possible. I don’t want to change suspension to a drag type setup, as that’s cheating in my books - run it they way you drive it everyday - hopefully it will be enough to run a 12

What type of gearbox/diff are you running?

Hi Chris, I can't give you R32 GTST or 180SX times but I can give you R34 GTT times which may help. Same car, 290 rwkw using 16" and 17" wheels did;

11.9 at 120 mph on 17" Nitto 555's

12.4 at 114 mph on 17" normal road tyres

11.6 at 123 mph on 16" Goodyear drag slicks

As for drag style suspension, this car had much softer rear spring rates than you would find in the typical Japanese coil overs. But what I consider about the correct rates for Australian roads anyway. The wheel alignment settings where optimised for straight lines and off the line traction (no neg camber and no toe out). Plus the dynamic camber change angles where optimised (didn't go too negative on squat). Plus we added a little anti squat to the rear geometry. The rear stabiliser bars (22mm) is set on its softest setting and the front bar (27mm) is on its hardest. This sort of setting up (optimisation) was easy worth 0.5 second.

None of this detracts from its road handling, if fact it probably has a better ride/handling compromise than most. When we take it to the circuit we, of course, change these setting to something more suited to going around corners on a very smooth surface. Otherwise we would be compromising the lap times and ripping the edges of the tyres to shreds.

So if you want your car to be multitalented then you have to have adjustability, that's not "cheating" it's common sense.

Hope that helps

i reakon you migh as well buy a gtr straight off the bat. by the time u spend the necessary cash on a gtst u could be sitting in godzilla with few mods and run those times. The gtr would have better resale and turn way more heads. cheers

i reakon you migh as well buy a gtr straight off the bat. by the time u spend the necessary cash on a gtst u could be sitting in godzilla with few mods and run those times. The gtr would have better resale and turn way more heads. cheers

Mate wake up, for what a stock as a rock 93-94 R32 GTR was costing a year ago, I was able to buy a modded off its tits 1996 R33 gtst, and trust me when I say no GTR with a few mods like you quoted comes any where near me time wise down the 1/4

The GTR can never lose can it? hahaha

So you did you decided to run those GTR cams Roy?  I'm thinking seriously on the GTR's after we spoke over pm a few days ago...  They should wake up my GT25R a fair amount (that turbo is the reason I'm not buying the cams until winter).  Did you decide to use them with just GTR springs or the whole solid works?

I'd imagine with the 20 in my car, I should be about the same weight as you are... or slightly less.  Hopefully I can pull the same low 12's high 11's that you might run (Hybrid FMIC, 3-4" tapered GReddy TR2 exhaust, no cat, MKIV fuel pump, 550cc S5 inj, K&N pod filter, S-AFC 5 knob, and RB25 MAF).  I still might need some more control over the engine... not sure though.

Im in a different state to my car at the moment, but when i get my hands on it im going to drop some new spark plugs in it and at the same time give it a compression test. If all ise well then ill throw the GTR cams and cam gears, some new valve springs and be on my merry way, still using hydraulic lifters...if the engine isnt in the best of health, well ... who knows.

Well good luck bud! Hopefully all turns out well. It was said my motor had 65k on the clock when it was pulled. I will be checking mine as well when it goes in the car... luckily that countdown has turned into days now... sometime next month! I have to buy a turbo now due to my buddy needing my stock one more than me (his daily driver 20 turbo went on him 2 weeks ago). Hey, what are friend for right?

It will be nice to have a quick car at the drags... but I really can't wait to put her on a circuit or auto-x!

I've owned a SR20DET 180sx and a CA18DET 180sx (which was the strawberry face). Anyways, I found the CA18 actually revved a lot more easily than the SR (actually very similar revving to my current RB20DE R32). I managed to get 174rwkw out of the CA18, never actually modified the SR so I couldn't tell ya how differently it responded.

get around 300 rwhp to do mid-high 12s 340-350 rwhp for high 11s. Some traction and a decent drive. Its almost that easy, many threads on how to get power out of our engines.

Ive got r31 with rb20det with hi flow vg30 turbo, mines ecu 1.2 bar boost and the normal bigger fuel pumps full exhaust front mount and ive done a 12.6 at ~113 mph. With tuned ecu bigger injectors im hoping to do a low low 12

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...