Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It is an interesting result, falls over quite early for a cammed RB25 with a GT3076R though - wonder if there is a restriction somewhere or something. I would have expected a bit more, but I guess we have fairly few internally gated/stock manifold E85 results to work from.

  • 2 weeks later...

I wonder where you've seen that.

The GTX3582 AR63 isn't a good choise. It produce exact the same power as a GTX3076r but, came on 500rpm later! A GTX3582 Ar 0.63 doesn't make sense because the turbine housing is the limited factor! And with a Ar 0,82 it is very much to laggy. I say that with experience, because i've had a gt3582 Ar0.82 on my Gts-t with a external screemer pipe :-) ther's nothing to 5k rpm and than "bangggg!!" funny but not very useful.

Is there nobody who ha experience with a gzx3076r on rb25det?

I have gtx3076 .82 on my rb25...

  • 1 month later...

The RPM is calculated though, its usually not accurate from what I have seen, how can you know every car's ratios anyway? If you can't work it out from the graph i'm sure someone will have a guess for you, without seeing the sheet I can say it would probably come on hard around 4k.

My tune today didn't pan out, speed cut and a slipping lock up clutch ruined my chances of a good result with the 71. I will be back on the weekend with the SLD back in place hoping for 350kw.

The gtx3076r is similar in spool, if not a small margin worse, than the gt. The gtx really only comes to life once you start throwing lots of psi at it. Although.. Im sure a true twin scroll housing+manifold would bring the spool back to baseline.

Any luck with the tune Scott?

The gtx3076r is similar in spool, if not a small margin worse, than the gt. The gtx really only comes to life once you start throwing lots of psi at it. Although.. Im sure a true twin scroll housing+manifold would bring the spool back to baseline.

Any luck with the tune Scott?

I was seeing over 300kw in 4th at speed cut which I guess was around 5000 revs. Once I wire the SLD and get rid of speed cut again I will be able to see the outcome of my fine tuning. The MAC wastegate solenoid is working a treat now, it held a flat 25psi from what I could see. I will ramp it up on the weekend during the next run.

It has external gate, AVCR , 256cams, cam gear, maybe a 50/50 ethanol blend

id be happy with near 200kw at 4000rpm with 18-20psi

Why 50/50? how far away is Warwick from you? (or is there a Caltex up there?) You will see better gains from just running United e90 with none of the cold start issues we see down here...

You should come close, perhaps around 4200 revs? That's my guess.

well im doing all this on a tight arse budget and getting impatient, some parts like the HD clutch, walbro fuel pump, and now rear muffler with silencer may fail before it reaches 300kw

So i guess for now ill have to see what happens on the dyno, im thinking even 280 would be great,

50/50 blend is another cheaper option.

Edited by SliverS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...