Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

this sounds good

i've love to have enough funds to buy heaps of cool gear to test :/

should be a great source of reference too, i've been trying to find out if the eboost street is any good and it would be nice if there was an unbiased review of it

Awesome - looks like we are getting somewhere with a bit of interest :D

This will go across all states, so probably 2-3 people per state, maybe more if this really takes off!

Once SAU Nats is finished I'll start setting it all up.

If you think it's a crap idea, then please speak up and let us know why. More feedback we get the better!

Awesome - looks like we are getting somewhere with a bit of interest :D

This will go across all states, so probably 2-3 people per state, maybe more if this really takes off!

Once SAU Nats is finished I'll start setting it all up.

If you think it's a crap idea, then please speak up and let us know why. More feedback we get the better!

i think its a great idea, about time too

all the pc sites have reviews of new products, why not for cars?

Ah Excellentee!!!!! That would be very handy to have.

Once SAU Nats is done and dusted i'll start getting this organised and a new private section for those interested to start some discussions/points and get all of this happening

Interesting idea, but how does this differ from SAU's strict policy on negative comments on businesses and workshops?

How can we say XXX is junk if we can't also say XXX service is way to expensive or shoddy etc etc

A true review KB needs more than just rainbows and butterflys.

We'd also need to limit the scope. eg tyres, batteries, oils do we do these things or let the general media do this for us - after all there is plenty of open access stuff around for that type of product.

But I'd be interested,

Commenting on a product in a constructive way like "this doesn't work as it should", "this product does not live up to the manufacturers claims" if "XXX was done in XXX it would be better"...

Is quite a lot different to the usual forum dribble of:

"Blah blah blah are a bunch of thieving pricks and they blew my motor" or "XXX give shit tunes" and that type of thing.

Sounds like a really good idea, in the process of rebuilding my 32 from the ground up and will be trying out a few things along the way. I also have experience having to deal with the "car stuff" working at teh local auto one and being a mechanic i get to see a few things

Commenting on a product in a constructive way like "this doesn't work as it should", "this product does not live up to the manufacturers claims" if "XXX was done in XXX it would be better"...

Is quite a lot different to the usual forum dribble of:

"Blah blah blah are a bunch of thieving pricks and they blew my motor" or "XXX give shit tunes" and that type of thing.

Also thinking - You need to take price into account as just one facet...

Eg. Take a $1,000 brake kit vs a $10,000 one.

Obviously performance will not be "on par", but it comes down to an economy of scale. If you get 60% of the performance for 90% cost saved, that would hopefully be covered in the review, then it's not really a shit product. It's just suiting the market that it is targeted at and so on.

Plenty of things to look at more in depth and hence the reviews will not be release by "anyone", it will be from someone on the team so they know the requirements and the group can talk/discuss a review before it goes ahead, during, after etc to workout the best way to benefit everyone who will read it.

But that's not to say if you pay 10k for a product in a market that expects it to be better - than such comments cannot be said.

Anyone (business etc) that approaches the Review Team with a product will be made very aware that if the product is indeed lack lustre or does not perform - it will be published as such.

I think most legitimate people would support that - and if not, their loss on market exposure and testing.

Plenty of PC parts get called out as under performing, yet companies still submit other things for review that are comparatively awesome :thumbsup:

I think most legitimate people would support that - and if not, their loss on market exposure and testing.

Plenty of PC parts get called out as under performing, yet companies still submit other things for review that are comparatively awesome :thumbsup:

There is a big difference between reviewing a product and reviewing a service.

As always, truth is an absolute defence against libel, however, with a product any negative issues raised can be repeated or addressed by anyone with a similar product.

With a service however, such as car tuning, part sourcing, etc. there is no way to exactly repeat the procedure.

For example, about ten years ago a food critic ripped up a Sydney restaurant (I think it was called Blue Angel, from memory), claiming that the lobster he ordered was overcooked. Being an objective review, he was undercover and did not inform the restaurant of this fact and then went away to write up the review. When it was published (I think it was in the Sydney Morning Herald) the restaurant lost loads of business and went bust.

The owner sued, claiming that the lobster was, in fact, not overcooked. As there was no proof either way, the courts sided with the restauranteur against Packer's clan of lawyers. The settlement was allegedly for millions of dollars. Since then, try to find a negative restaurant review in the newspaper. At worst it'll be mildly critical of ingredient choice or decor, rarely (if ever) of taste or service.

When reviewing a product though, if the reviewer says the part did not do as it should have, can show evidence of the same and keep the review professional (i.e. not a "rant") they have nothing to fear.

Say you review one of those magnetic fuel molecular aligners (or whatever they're called) and the box claims a minimum 5% increase in power, you call it crap and suggest the intelligence of the people making it is somewhere between a single celled organism and a wet fart after an all weekend curry binge. They will naturally be upset that you focused on the people and company and not the product and may sue your arse.

If however, you call the product crap, have dyno sheets to back up your assertions and keep the comments to the product in question, you have nothing to worry about, and can pretty much trash it to your hearts content. (check out websites like angrysnowboarder.com for examples, though I'd still try to avoid challenging company reps to bare knuckle brawls...)

If every reviewer can document their experience and back up their reasons then no company can have a valid reason for any legal recourse. Also I doubt that a negative review in SAU will affect part manufacturers very much, unless SAU can manage to get a million or more members.

Edited by Kozeyekan

There is a big difference between reviewing a product and reviewing a service.

As always, truth is an absolute defence against libel, however, with a product any negative issues raised can be repeated or addressed by anyone with a similar product.

With a service however, such as car tuning, part sourcing, etc. there is no way to exactly repeat the procedure.

If however, you call the product crap, have dyno sheets to back up your assertions and keep the comments to the product in question, you have nothing to worry about, and can pretty much trash it to your hearts content.

If every reviewer can document their experience and back up their reasons then no company can have a valid reason for any legal recourse.

Totally agree. Removed the stuff not relevant and it's not really going to be service related if at all possible.

Obviously specific parts that require a re-tune or similar will be hard, so it must be approached carefully but they will be limited scenarios at least for the initial term as that would require much more experience within the Team.

As I said though the intention will never be to "trash" a product even if there is the proof. It'll be viewed in a constructive light with regards to the feedback/review. Bagging out a product outright is just a poor way to go about things and won't achieve anything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to my 2004 Toyota Mark ii IR-V Fortuna (series 2) With a 1JZ-GTE powerplant under the bonnet (hood) it'll give me plenty of scope for power upgrades. For those who aren't familiar with imports, the 1JZ-GTE is a 2.5L 6 cylinder VVTi engine with a single turbocharger. This has the factory R154 5 speed gearbox, along with a aftermarket 2 way LSD differential (brand unknown). Under the arches are a set of CST Zero 1 alloys, 18x9 +30 225/40 up front and 18x9.5 +15 265/35 on the rear. The car was quite low in Japan and there's evidence of the wheels catching the rolled arches/fenders. The tyre's aren't great so I'm in two minds whether to replace both or just the tyres and put up with the wider wheels on the rear. The car still uses stock brakes with the addition of some braided hoses. The exterior is stock with the exception of a BN Sports front bumper and a replacement Fortuna grill  Moving to the interior, the steering wheel has been replaced with a dished MOMO steering wheel (which will get swapped for my Momo Tuner for the time being) Defi Link Gauges are mounted above the climate controls and on the A pillar, the Oil Temp,Oil Pressure,Water Temp and Boost gauges should help with spirited and track driving  The stock seats have been replaced with some retrimmed Recaro bucket seats. Being a larger build these are a little snug, unfortunately the orange isn't for me so I'll look into replacing these down the line. Other modifications include a twin plate clutch, Blitz intercooler, Evolve alloy radiator, a stainless exhaust with decat, HKS EVC-S boost controller and coil overs
    • Apologies for the long read My R34 GTT was up for sale at the beginning of spring due to a few repairs creeping up. The strut tops needed replacing, roof and bonnet (hood) painting (yay for 3 stage pearl) and the underside stripped and treated. I sold the car which allowed me to be in a much better place financially. Leading up to the sale I was already thinking about the replacement. In an ideal world it needed to be a good all-rounder. Something I can mess around with, modify, do track days, do the school run, go on long drives etc.  Options included but not limited to... Laurel C35, Evo 8/9, Civic FD2, Impreza Hawkeye, Aristo and even an Audi S4 Avant (I've already got the Mazda 6 wagon). But there was always one car at the top of the list The Toyota Mark ii JZX110 I found an advert on a Facebook group for an example in Japan, from a seller called Jon at Rising Sun Exports. A few messages back and forth and Jon calls me from Yokohama one morning (or afternoon in his case). He briefly explained the import process, the costs involved and a repeat of the advert. After much deliberation, the price was agreed and the sale was locked in. I've never imported a vehicle so I jumped into the unknown head first. The money transfer was completed through wise.com (fees apply), very easy to use and the money was with him within a day or two.  The car suspension was raised for the vessel and the car dropped off at the port. It was 7 weeks later when the bill of lading was received and the freight invoice sent to me, followed by the export certificate a couple of days after (both digital copies) In the mean time the port had been in contact. I needed an agent to deal with the NOVA (notification of vehicle arrival) along with the tax/duty invoice, this was £75.00. The port also had a fee of £100, I'm guessing to cover the cost of the 10 day 'free storage' and for moving the car off the boat etc. They need a copy of the vehicle invoice, freight invoice and export certificate to allow the vehicle to pass through customs. The vessel arrived on Tuesday 5th August, the tax/duty invoice was generated and sent over. This is generally tax 20% and duty 10% of the vehicle value. Although the invoice came in at a higher amount than I had calculated. Once HMRC had received the payment the vehicle could be released from customs. I thought once the tax/duty was paid you could collect at any point, that's not the case. Your agent will need to book a collection slot, I requested Thursday 7th which was accepted, with a 9:00am slot allocated. It was a 5:00am start from Norfolk heading to Southampton. We eventually found the compound, upon presenting the bill of lading and some ID they released the car (they drove it out of the compound to the front ready for us to load up). The email from the port stated each slot had a 10 minute window, which seemed abit farfetched but the staff said it's not a strict rule. We were there for approx. 30-40 mins in total. A week prior to collecting I contacted my garage and explained the situation, I was able to get an inspection slot that afternoon. For the registration, DVLA require the car to be insured, for this I used a company called Adrian Flux who can insure the vehicle using the VIN number. 
    • Hey guys, looking for these side skirts if anyone can help me out. 
    • Wife and I are still looking for a new home. One condition was a large enough garage for a full-size lift in one bay. Now if only we could find something... We've been looking for almost a year now.
    • Thanks everyone for the ideas! Sadly, ramps are a no go for me. With young kids at home, I do most of my work late at night while they're sleeping. Starting the car multiple times wouldn't be a great idea.  I'll go see one of those new long reach low profile jacks and take a couple measurements to see if they will fit.   
×
×
  • Create New...