Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The ports got a bit of a clean up, removing steps in the radius etc, and that was about it. I didn't remove the 'humps' in the exhaust ports, just my choice :D .

post-12712-0-48726300-1331079541_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-30974300-1331079544_thumb.jpg

Just to prove I ain't ripping off web pics, my ugly mug lol. Putting grubscrews into crank, loctited in to be sure.

post-12712-0-14832400-1331079546_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-38020400-1331079548_thumb.jpg

Crank getting fitted and measured up for bearing clearances 0.0015"-0.002" from memory, thrust 0.011". Girdle torqued up, and you can just see the 3 long studs that have been shortened to clear sump and driveshaft tube. 55FT-LB.

post-12712-0-60155000-1331079550_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-00810800-1331079553_thumb.jpg

Pistons and rods getting some attention. Piston rings clocked as per service manual.

post-12712-0-46781400-1331079555_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-06087900-1331079558_thumb.jpg

Fitting the piston and rod into the bore. Rod bolts, I tightened them using a bolt stretch gauge on the 3rd cycle. 0.0055" stretch.

post-12712-0-58449600-1331079560_thumb.jpg

Today piston to deck height will be measured and if all good it'll all be put together permanently.

Hey Sean,

Looking good , let me know what the deack height is and what head gasket you using ( i have a nismo 0.9mm gasket if interested). Why i ask is john has Set my motor to have 33thou squish, try and aim for that if you can.

Hi Bob,

Block had about 0.006" taken off the deck, I was told.

Deck height of pistons' quench measured up 0.016-0.017'' proud of the deck, 0.003-0.004" on the other side squish.

He is using a cosworth 1.1mm (0.0455") head gasket.

So squish will be 0.0285". So over 0.5mm, it should be enough clearance when engine is running in the higher RPM ranges.

I aim to have the cylinder head on and torqued up tomorrow.

Hi Bob,

Block had about 0.006" taken off the deck, I was told.

Deck height of pistons' quench measured up 0.016-0.017'' proud of the deck, 0.003-0.004" on the other side squish.

He is using a cosworth 1.1mm (0.0455") head gasket.

So squish will be 0.0285". So over 0.5mm, it should be enough clearance when engine is running in the higher RPM ranges.

I aim to have the cylinder head on and torqued up tomorrow.

Hey Sean,

That is a tight squish i think its way to tight lower limit is 33 thou any lower then this may be a problem. I would do a dummy build to check this measurement to make sure.

And can you confirm the piston flat surface ( Piston squish area ) extends out of the block at 0.016 - 0.017" ?

Just a note on tight squish, the car will have problems idling and if it does idle it will be rough

These were measurements I took yesterday with the pistons at TDC, bottom end dummy assembled.

0.0045" under your 33 thou. He'll love the idle more then haha, barp barrrp barp....along with the cams.

I'll dummy fit head and double check gap with clay.

So I fitted head and measured the clay after lunch. Squish measured up at 0.038" with the head torqued down.

After dummy fitting the cylinder head, it was removed, head gasket was hylomared, then head was fitted and torqued in steps to 110 FTLBs.

Then cam caps were fitted and torqued to 10FTLBs. Timing accessories were then fitted and a dial gauge used to check piston Top Dead Center etc.

Cam gears set to 0, 0 degrees, as HKS cams are being used, and they can be fiddled with on the dyno at a later stage.

post-12712-0-99574400-1331219660_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-54030900-1331219663_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-57392000-1331219665_thumb.jpg

Block painted in heatproof matt black to see leaks easily ;)

post-12712-0-19418800-1331219668_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-51088400-1331219670_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-00993600-1331219673_thumb.jpg

Timing done! Nice colour.

post-12712-0-58844600-1331219675_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-71269600-1331219677_thumb.jpgpost-12712-0-99183400-1331219679_thumb.jpg

Harmonic balancer still needs to be torqued up. Might make up a tool to hold the balancer at the front as I'm torquing up the crank bolt, instead of twisting the crank if I held it at the back of the crank....

bore: 86.5mm

stroke: 73.7mm

head gasket thickness: 1.1mm

deck height: around -0.013in (one side of piston was .003", the other side was .016")

piston dome: -16.2cc

combustion chamber: 64.5cc

Hey Paul,

I calculated static CR at around 9.2:1, keeping in mind this engine is using non standard cams, so upping the comp a bit will help with off boost drivability and regain a little efficiency back at low to mid RPM due to the longer duration cams (264deg 8.8mm lift).

great now i'm going to have to put the 4.11 back just to keep up again........

but seriously looks good, keen to hear and see it go......hard! will have to go cruising when i get back buddy.

Bloody Oath... but mind you you have the torque :closedeyes:

Feels like ages without my car lol

Blah blah.......back on topic!! put the engine in today and fitted up the gearbox. Sucks doing it all by yourself..

This was after spending the morning sorting out all the minor crap before the engine could go in...

Pics will be up tomorrow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...