Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You were too busy eating dick

Need to go back to sleep

what?

on topic of movies. I booked twilight for the missus. shes been hassling me about it for a while. booked gold class so i can enter, and sleep for a good couple of hours..

I think flynn might be jelous that im not appreciative of his skinny white boyfriend. :nyaanyaa:

Sleep at work?

Maybe, but got some meetings today to prepare for

what?

on topic of movies. I booked twilight for the missus. shes been hassling me about it for a while. booked gold class so i can enter, and sleep for a good couple of hours..

I think flynn might be jelous that im not appreciative of his skinny white boyfriend. :nyaanyaa:

Pretty sure my missus will want to see that. Saw the ad, looked boring. Did not see one scene of action :/

Do you want every customer in the restaurant to come and thank you? I'd imagine that would get annoying and interrupt a busy kitchen.. Then there's the health & safety issues of customers coming into the kitchen.

If it's just celebrities, seems like ego stroking to me

I never go and thank the chef at a restaurant and I don't think I'm rude or lacking manners

e

it's an open kitchen that you have to walk past to leave the venue.

you have to come within 1m of the chef on the pass and are looking right at him... MOST people have the manners to give you a freindly nod, or say a passing thanks. however most celebs are too god even for this

Couldn't of put it better my self :)

The only way In Time could be fully enjoyed is make a drinking game whenever someone says "time" in the movie. You will be drunk halfway through the movie and most likely dead at the end of it.

There were two things that made me want to see this movie: 1) The premise sounded interesting. The fact that it's about people living off time, with the rich living forever and the poor living off borrowed time is a rather thought-provoking one. And 2) I like Justin Timberlake. What saddens me is that he just wasn't very good in this movie, as he and the dowey-eyed Amanda Siegfried both just seem so bored throughout the entire movie. They have zero chemistry and I'm even going to say that they are just as bad as Anakin and Padme in Star Wars. That's the lowest bar you can go in the chemistry lab.

Not only did Justin Timberlake seem bored, but he also has a hard time conveying certain emotions. Take the scene where his mother dies in his arms, for instance. Wasn't convinced, Justin. His crying felt forced and it was. After that he vows revenge against all the time people, and risks being chased by the Timekeeper (the always awesome Cillian Murphy), and after he is given a decade worth of time from someone who is tired of living, he meets up with some rich people and kidnaps a rather high Amanda Siegfried and then starts taking time, and giving it to people, you know, like Robin Hood.... except with time. They work together, bored the whole way through, and they try to convey emotions like love.... because if you have a guy and a girl on screen together, you have to make them full in love. That's Hollywood 101 right there!

This is really disappointing to me because I expected better out of In Time. What I got is pretty much a boring movie, with a premise that sounded interesting but then it turns the movie into a one-note-wonder. If I could turn back time, I would have seen Puss In Boots instead.

what?

on topic of movies. I booked twilight for the missus. shes been hassling me about it for a while. booked gold class so i can enter, and sleep for a good couple of hours..

i laughed so much in the second one i nearly got kicked out of the movie theater. the gf at the time wasnt too happy with me either lol. srsly what the f**k kinda vampire glitters? and is a f**king virgin?

Obama in Australia=

27 cars

5 planes

1 helicopter

100 secret service agents

numerous rooftop snipers wherever he goes.

ObamaRage.jpg

lol i heard that they left most of the timesheets for the agents checking out possible places he's gonna visit in an unattended van in the cbd. security fail

i laughed so much in the second one i nearly got kicked out of the movie theater. the gf at the time wasnt too happy with me either lol. srsly what the f**k kinda vampire glitters? and is a f**king virgin?

lol i heard that they left most of the timesheets for the agents checking out possible places he's gonna visit in an unattended van in the cbd. security fail

hahhahahah i think the same thing. but i havnt taken her out in a while so i thought i may as well suck it up

Australia would be a perfect place to assassinate. He IS number one on Al Qaeda's hit list, and those kunts can be anywhere.

inb4 Al Qaeda is an American fabrication.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...