Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sigh... LPG for a power upgrade, not economy

It has a massive RON and I want to run dedicated for 240-250 rwkw, not some shitty duel fuel system.

Not to mention it will be cheaper to run and should be cop hassle free if set up correctly

Sigh... LPG for a power upgrade, not economy

It has a massive RON and I want to run dedicated for 240-250 rwkw, not some shitty duel fuel system.

Not to mention it will be cheaper to run and should be cop hassle free if set up correctly

Any reason for LPG over jumping on E85 bandwagon, convenience I'm guessing?

Does it also have the benefit of keeping your engine cooler like E85 does compared to 98?

From memory, it runs hotter unless it's PROPERLY setup, could be wrong though I looked into it ages ago so my memory is hazy on that.

Yum cha setups are for economy/tightarses and installer tune accordingly.

Thought about it but e85 economy sucks and evo fuel tank is the size of a coke bottle. LPG economy is the same but available everywhere.

It is also legit when you need to explain it to cops.

With intank walbro, 8MR turbo and BOV, highflow panel filter in stock box making LICP the only intake mod and a 3" exhaust with a varex this should leave me just shy of 250rwkw and relatively cop acceptable.

E85 leaves aftermarket stuff visible like injectors without the excuse of it being a non performance, legal LPG conversion and for some reason seems to be killing e7 4G63's

Thought about it but e85 economy sucks and evo fuel tank is the size of a coke bottle. LPG economy is the same but available everywhere.

It is also legit when you need to explain it to cops.

With intank walbro, 8MR turbo and BOV, highflow panel filter in stock box making LICP the only intake mod and a 3" exhaust with a varex this should leave me just shy of 250rwkw and relatively cop acceptable.

E85 leaves aftermarket stuff visible like injectors without the excuse of it being a non performance, legal LPG conversion and for some reason seems to be killing e7 4G63's

You're planning on dual fuel setup or straight gas?

Totally understand the convenience thing, especially evo tank aren't that big.

May have to run tanks in the boot, couple small ones on each side
Isn't straight gas legally unable to be epa'd, well that's what I heard whether it's true or not

But yeah can't run dual fuel and make power, needs to be straight gas to make more power than petrol

My accountant f**ked me

$7 refund

Anger rising

I've got a $33 due to the ATO :(

What is this? I don't even...

ATO must be crackin down. I claimed a lot and got back less than expected. oh well.

ATO = faggots

Hope you guys aren't being serious

Just because you lodge a tax return doesn't mean your automatically entitled to a refund

For your average John Doe your refund is more dependant on your employer rather than the Tax Office or Accountant

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...