Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have had very good work done at erd and i recommed them highly but I don't think my car will be returning there.

Yes I was warned, I will admit that I may have caused the engine damage, but does that really mean that I can't try to resolve my problems and ask for assistance on here now?

Just a note, what I assumed was detonation was actually a leaky gasket, although my engine did knock with the old turbo when I tried regular unleaded. Once it knocked I drained the tank and filled it with 98 again.

  • Replies 886
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Whut? How do you confuse det and a leaky gasket.

No leaky gasket I have ever heard sounds like marbles in paint tin?????

Stop asking questions if you don't want to hear the answers

Sometimes you just can't hear the knock. The sound a leaky gasket can give off is VERY different on many cars. I had a leak gasket on my old car, it sounded like someone tearing steel apart. I had another leaky gasket(cat and muffler) it sounded like a blup and only happened at one point in the RPM and I really did think it was knock. It is hard to tell knock apart from other sounds.

I was reading a magazine of my brothers and a cheap, and accurate, way to listen for knock apart from electronics is to stick a screw into the coil pack cover thread. Screw it in there nicely then get a length of hose and put it over that screw and put one end in your ear. It acts like a stethoscope. Knocks are head as thuds in the engine. This works almost exactly like a knock detector, it listens for the sound then gives an electrical output, rather than a physically audible output.

When my car was being tuned by the two tuners who done it, there was a difference in how they done it. Both used the power fc, both used knock ears but one said you can never trust electronics and when he was doing each run to test the settings he done, he would place his head under the bonnet, blocked ears and listen for the engine thumping around and believe me he heard knock the power fc and knock detector didn't show.

This is probably a stupid question but is the wiring harness/Ecu, intercooler, and exhaust all I need to change to fit an rb26, the neo uses a 26 block from what I've read so it should just bolt in no problems yeah?

You use the harness and ECU for the head you are using. Run an Rb25 series 2 head, use rb25 series 2 loom and ecu. Run the Rb26, us the 26 loom and ecu. They can be hacked up to work around other ways etc but its the easiest to make things fit.

+1

if you want to run an RB26 block thats fine, but do not bother doing the head aswell.

Put your RB25 head on with an external oil feed to the VCT port (easy to do) if thats all you can find that will go in that is.

To put a whole RB26 in with the heads and all you will need all the intake and ehxaust side to go with it, wiring harness and ECU. Not worth the hassle IMHO.

http://www.ripsltd.com/products.html

RB30 stock internal long engine (block crank, pistons, rods, oil pump, GTR head gasket, Complete R33 RB25 head, new water pump, cam belt, idler and tensioner bearings) fully refreshed with crack tested, straight tested, cleaned, polished and grub screwed crank, ACL race bearings, mint stock oil pump, acid dipped block with oil restrictors, power honed, decked, new high quality rings, new brass frost plugs, refreshed stock head with new seals etc, all assembled and painted (suit 600hp and 7000rpm) nzd5000 for 2wd or nzd6000 for 4wd with adapter plate and pickup.

Sadly I haven't gotten very far, I've pulled off the intercooler pipes and fixed a few things, but I'm rather concerned because when I removed the pipe from the turbo to intercooler, it was covered in what looks like metal/dust. I'm not sure if I had an air leak and it's just dirt or what's going on.

Gtst - thanks il contact them.

He has contacts through work that he can get most motors and gearboxes etc.

I'm pretty certain that he would be able to supply a NEO motor and fit it for cheaper than you will find elsewhere.

I'll send him a link to this thread to read over.

Not sure if he is a member here.

Yeah the rb30 short block is looking very good, except for the vct stuff. Plus il need a new turbo. It looks like il just do a complete rebuild at the moment, just not sure if I should do the water pump/timing belt too, they were only done 50000 km ago.

Wither its got VCT or not it spools up a 500HP turbo like a R33 on stock turbo. definitly worth going for, I can modify your current turbo to a G3 at no cost, which is good for about 300rwkws bolton.

You will need to get a NA cam with came gear, and an different timing belt. Check Rb30det section

Il see how it looks on the inside and compare prices. I just don't want to change the ecu, r33 would mean a new ecu, I might email rips and see what it will cost to put my head on a rb30 short block.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any difference in induction noise?
    • If I got a dollar for every flipped commuter missile I've driven past I'd have two dollars   Some people get into wild adventures on the road and I doubt it's gender or ethnicity specific. I'm just glad I don't usually drive during peak times.
    • Just got the car back and gave it a good run back home Power wise, whilst it only made a extra 5 killerwasps up top at 7200 rpm, it made more power everywhere from 2500 rpm and kept pulling much harder all the way, to the point of me relearning when to shift so I don't hit the 7200 limiter, with the old intake it seemed to take alot more time to rev out, and, throttle response is also much improved  As I didn't want to remove the bumper every time I serviced the air filter (basically every aftermarket and fabricated CAI has the filter behind the bumper) it currently has a hektic exposed pod in the engine bay sucking in hot air, this will be rectified shortly after some some of my CAD (cardboard assisted design) for a alloy heat shield feed by the OEM intake tube behind the bumper, this will cop some wrinkle black paint, as well as the intake pipe for that totally OEM look... The only fly in the ointment was that the OEM "strut" brace doesn't fit over the rear runner of the new intake with the 2.5 engine is in the engine bay, as the 2.5 raises the engine up by 20mm, it's not a war stopper, and I didn't notice any difference without it in some twisties, but....... MX5 Mania is bringing in some GWR "fancy pants" braces that apparently do fit, if it bolts up I'll grab it, it is also stiffer than the OEM one, which is a bonus All in all I'm happy with the outcome      Fancy pants "strut" brace that gives the required clearance      This is where the clearance issue was, the GWR extends out past this
    • Well, I'm back from the dyno today. Some things do partially make sense. The pod filter/airbox delete picked up between 6-10rwkw on 98 - because heat soak does kind of affect things and there was playing with tune/timing/AFR. Oddly enough, the car was running much leaner than before. So lean it was audibly pinging on the dyno which I got video of:   70de0dd5-2099-4a71-8b10-6fc833fb9d59.mp4   We're talking going from ~12.7 in the past to the first run being at like ~14.0. It is now tuned to ~12.5 on the Dyno, which correlates to about ~12.1 on my wideband in the car. These matched last time, which is very odd. The dyno plots only show the dyno's reported AFR - should be last time, yet now it no longer agrees and was way leaner. Nobody has an explanation for how a pod can make the car run notably leaner, yet not really give any more power when you add fuel in. A few different types of intake design were tested:   94c22c34-7991-4902-af85-314b5f5bf352.mp4   There was no difference other than IAT with the pod sticking out of the bay. The pod sticking out of the bay (but connected) is actually still warmer than what I usually see on the road. Removing the pod entirely lost about ~2kw. But to be fair, all of the runs could be argued to vary by that amount when temperatures climb etc etc. It's safe to say that the filter isn't causing any restrictions of any note that can be reasonably altered in any way. This is in line with what I'd expect given the Engine Masters testing. 323KW on 98 and ~335KW on E85 is actually a pretty solid result, up about ~45kw from 99% of LS1 cammed combos, with generally much larger cams/exhaust etc as well. It is after all up 42KW (98) and 54KW (E85) from before. +10KW from a pod and removing the box is cheap as chips compared to what the head work cost per kw No, I did not get to drop the exhaust and test. When it comes to exhaust... it all just seems to change frequencies and cost or gain 2hp here or there. I don't realistically think I'll drop this to test it - because there's not much else I can really do about it/route it any other way/make it bigger/just bought mufflers. Engine masters beat the hell out of headers with a hammer to deliberately kink them and didn't lose power at all, I sincerely doubt that going larger primaries would help. If it were even possible for clearance/conversion reasons... which it's not... I may throw the E85 in there at some point and do a drag run to see what MPH it traps for science. It isn't lost on me that ~320kw Skylines do trap about the same MPH that ~370kw F-Body/Corvettes do in the USA for the same  or similar weight. (122-125mph). Of course, if I go there and trap 104mph or something then I'll just 'accidentally' have an accident on the way home from the drag strip and buy a M4.
×
×
  • Create New...