Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It has always enthralled my that everyone, myself included, replaces the section of exhaust behind the cat, leaving the massively restrictive lump of cast iron attached to the turbo outlet.

Surely it would be more advantageous to replace the dump pipe (the lump of cast iron) with something that would allow the exhaust gasses to get away from the turbine faster. Surely that is a better performance enhancer that letting the gasses free-flow from halfway down the exhaust tract.

simple explanation but a good one.... chef would also compare it to head and white women.... it doesnt matter how big her mouth is if she doesnt swallow... oh wait hang on... nah i'll leave i'd just dig myself deeper... sorry girls forgive me.

But to be serious the idea of modding the exhaust is to allow the engine to blow out with more ease, just like modding your intake makes it suck harder... urrmm... sorry.... breath in easier.

With a cat back your modding the least imprtant part.... ie the very last stop before it goes out to atmosphere, its still had to make its way through the toilet role sized tube from the turbo. so your still sucking a melon down a hose pipe.

Going for a full turbo back ensures that you have no restrictions after your exhaust spools the turbo and makes its final sprint out the back...

Remeber, your exhaust will only blow as fast as the smaller bit will let it.... even if u put big bits after it.

mate... i got mine at western mufflers in fairfield.... $1300 - 3 inch all the way from the turbo including highflow cat and 5 inch tip. Very nice me thinks... nice note and not too loud. I have alot of faith in them too... my bro in law builds and races various cars and thats where he got his... heh and he's were i heard about these guys.

generally if you know the right people you can get it done for around the same price messiah did. i paid $250 for a second hand 5" cannon, then $750 for a 3" turbo back stainless exhaust with a stainless resonator. add about another $250 for a high flow cat (which i dont have as my car is a '82) and the exhaust will owe you $1250. not too bad considering a second hand japanese brand will cost around the same price, but will most probably be scratched up + the baffles used in majority of the muffler cans will need replacing - about $150 - as the japs only use mild steel inserts in a stainless steel exhaust......go figure??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...