Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Deka 80 lbs are cheaper. handle e85 no worries also.

But the atomisation isn't that awesome.

Can give a poor idle and poor fuel economy in a daily.

The cheaper the injector, the poorer the atomisation essentially.

there was a group buy for dekka injectors, with rail and plugs a while back... I got the whole setup from that... if you go check the thread you'll find everything you need and probably a supplier as well...

Agreed I have some Deka 750's in my stock rail and they have been just fine.

.82 rear housing 3076R's that are internally gated on 3 cars I have now seen have been real let downs as far as ramping on boost hard and fast plus they just don't seem to perform in terms of returning good kw figures.

Have seen some issues with boost spikes (not huge ones) however have seen an externall gated 3076 running a tial 44 that was still stuck on the stock manifold and it was an absolute animal of a car... Just my two sence. If it was me I'd go an external gate option (plumbed in or screamer) doesn't really phase me but they just seem to work a lot more efficiently and get up an go quicker

But the atomisation isn't that awesome.

Can give a poor idle and poor fuel economy in a daily.

The cheaper the injector, the poorer the atomisation essentially.

thats bullshit.. people have used them in street cars with zero issues.

anyway the injectors can be had dirt cheap now.. http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170422792434&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

thats for 3/4 length. rail spacer not needed. Go to bursons or motor traders for the plugs. 22 bucks for 6 of them and then solder them onto your injector loom.

Awesome info people. Thanks for the pics. I just received all but the turbo this week so Ill be a bit busy this weekend fitting what I can. Does anyone know what the apexi super suction kits are like? I have seen some for the R33 and apparently they fit on the 34's Linky Link and link. Just wondering what they are like. they do look pretty flash. If not any suggestions on some sort of bolt on suction kits?? Pics up when I fit it all :D

Agreed I have some Deka 750's in my stock rail and they have been just fine.

.82 rear housing 3076R's that are internally gated on 3 cars I have now seen have been real let downs as far as ramping on boost hard and fast plus they just don't seem to perform in terms of returning good kw figures.

Have seen some issues with boost spikes (not huge ones) however have seen an externall gated 3076 running a tial 44 that was still stuck on the stock manifold and it was an absolute animal of a car... Just my two sence. If it was me I'd go an external gate option (plumbed in or screamer) doesn't really phase me but they just seem to work a lot more efficiently and get up an go quicker

:( surely the ramp up has nothing to do with an internal or external gate, i thought the wastgate only affected it once it was on full boost, i want to purchase a gtx3076 and now very confused, hmmm

external setups have a much better flow path than internal setups, even when the gate is closed, resulting in better spool

also, with an external setup you usually feed boost to the top port which keeps the gate completely sealed until needed. internal setups with a normal actuator will always crack open well before you reach target boost.

Edited by JonnoHR31

external setups have a much better flow path than internal setups, even when the gate is closed, resulting in better spool

also, with an external setup you usually feed boost to the top port which keeps the gate completely sealed until needed. internal setups with a normal actuator will always crack open well before you reach target boost.

Does that still apply to if you have a EBC?

is a twin scroll housing a good idea for .82 internal 3076?

If a GTX3076 flows so well , would a 0.63 external be effective 300kw setup?

Im trying to decide the best rear housing set up for gt3076 , too many options.

Edited by SliverS2

Still applies. Done right an external will flow a lot more exhaust which means more power. Theoretically a .63 will work great with a large external but better than a .82 im not sure.

Remember there is less exhaust going through the turbine with the .63 so the compressor will have less energy to drive it.

Still applies. Done right an external will flow a lot more exhaust which means more power. Theoretically a .63 will work great with a large external but better than a .82 im not sure.

Remember there is less exhaust going through the turbine with the .63 so the compressor will have less energy to drive it.

so with the external , do you buy a "tial 0.82" housing" and then drill a hole for the external in the manifold or on the outside of the housing?? was spring rating would it be ? for the 300kw?

nobbie question :blush:

I would get the Tial and weld a stainless bend on it, like the Kando I just did. (check the Kando thread.) Run a 45mm turbosmart with whatever springs you need to run for your desired boost. New V band dump and screamer, youre done.

thats bullshit.. people have used them in street cars with zero issues.

anyway the injectors can be had dirt cheap now.. http://www.ebay.com....e=STRK:MEWAX:IT

thats for 3/4 length. rail spacer not needed. Go to bursons or motor traders for the plugs. 22 bucks for 6 of them and then solder them onto your injector loom.

they are not 3/4 length for anyone who goes to buy them,as i just emailed him to buy a set , they need are the full size ones needing spacers

cheers

darren

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...