Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lol at this fool! You know absolutely nothing about me or what im capable of or who I work for. You've produced absolutely no evidence as there is no evidence its all hear say! Thats why you've done nothing but speculate results in this entire thread and why you are waiting to see other people spend their hard earnt on the turbos and see their results ya muppet! If ya so sure of yourself why not just get your turbos? When i asked you your claim to fame i got a fapstick reply? So whats your experience with cars & why should somebody believe Mr Skidmarkz over Mick_O?

Pretty sure theres quite a few guys who could vouch for my experience and knowledge in here. How many can vouch for you?

As for the graph you posted as proof that i didn't know SHIT. The owner of that car wished he just went a single a little birdy told me :)

I've never heard so much shit come from one human ever.

Your a f**king joke.

You clearly have an over inflated view of yourself.

I've countered all your shit talk comments with accuracy and all you got to say you simple f**k is ....aaahhhh...... yea your a f**k wit mate.

Please

High PSI and big tight bends in pipe work create heat, the tight pipe work will create a lot of heat.
EGT temps are crucial when you get up to this level, along with intake air temps, this all worked out alongside PSI all helps with heat and efficiency big-time :rolleyes:

  • Like 2

Great posts Simon! :)

You pretty much confirm what ive been trying to say about the limitations of the stock position/bolt on GTR turbos when you start looking for 450kw or more on twins the choking turbines cant cope :)

  • Like 1

Great posts Simon! :)

You pretty much confirm what ive been trying to say about the limitations of the stock position/bolt on GTR turbos when you start looking for 450kw or more on twins the choking turbines cant cope :)

Yeah choking it is definitely a term I would describe it as, I know Paul says this. I have always been against singles............until I hit 600hp ;) I would have loved to have kept it and done the development on it, it get's very interesting and challenging.

Lol you're a f**kwit mate simple! This isn't wasting space on the thread at all! People need more than just your opinion on here. Clearly yours is uneducated & now you've got nothing to argue you wanna get all "PM" on me!

Be sure to post your results and prove me wrong soon as you stop sitting on the fence and dreaming up what these "hybrid turbos" will do with all your theories!

Agreed!

Mr Skid = Fu#kwit

High PSI and big tight bends in pipe work create heat, the tight pipe work will create a lot of heat.

EGT temps are crucial when you get up to this level, along with intake air temps, this all worked out alongside PSI all helps with heat and efficiency big-time :rolleyes:

Most people dont' change their 3" cooler piping out anyway Of course to flow 700hp of air out of some of the singles you don't need 30PSI which probably helps just a tiny tad....

Will be interested in seeing how the 60's go as they won't be putting out as much power.

  • Like 1

Wonder if the piping factor contributes to the massive gains in zed world? I have full (2x, 1 for each turbo/bank) 2.5in piping and cooler in/out etc. The graph i posted the other day has custom 3in piping (x2). The perth zed also has custom piping which i think is 2.5in.

Micko is saying the "chocking turbines can't cope" and is restrictive, if that's the case it doesn't bother the z32 setup.

The heat Simons setup saw would definitely be contributed to the factory inlets on a RB.

Biggest exhaust in the world won't help with a smaller intake,

That's the reason race cars and bikes run there race class restrictor on the intake side.

Simon told me he also had a 3.5 exhaust which chokes the system at HIS power level generating unnecessary heat.

My Z32 had twin 3" straight through with big intakes.

Edited by mr skidz

Didn't bigmikespec say the same thing as Mick_o did about the turbine wheels, either at the start of this thread or piggaz build thread and get shut down?

It seems good, but you dont get exhaust housings when you buy a brand new one just like the rest of the GTX series. But you can re-use the standard housings from the GT range.

Plus, I still dont see how these turbochargers will be overall "better", when it is essentially a new compressor wheel that flows more with the same turbine housing and wheel. The problem with these turbochargers is the restrictive exhaust side when trying to squeeze the most out of them.

Yep.

If you wanted to run a max of 600whp on a RB28 which is a shit load for a street car, especially with 4 10" tyres AND STANDARD LOOKING ENGINE BAY!

If I were to use a GTX63 and put 27psi not 33psi like Simon did only the 27 through factory RB inlet pipes it would move more air than -5's at every point of the Rev range given the 3.5 millimetre larger compressor wheel (until such time the turbine wheel does get overwhelmed with gas it can't discharge quick enough)

which in this case won't be until 560+kw which I won't see nor do I wanna see.

Longevity and OEM looking engine bay and keeping rpms lower is my preferred engine setup.

It's not a race car it's a street car

*Hence the E85

*Higher comp

*Longer stroke

*Shorter duration exhaust cam

And sum other little tricks...

Doesn't seem a real advantage for the effort when -5s get pretty close to 600hp on e85 without all the possible negatives that people have mentioned. And the other point being that gtx tech really only outperform the GTs at higher boost levels so then again what's the point.

  • Like 2

*Making same power on less boost = advantage

* the negatives mentioned are are basically the inlet piping which people use at 33psi and i wouldn't have be nothing to do with the turbocharger itself we can't blame the turbo for factory RB inlets tho.

It does pretty good I think considering.

Edited by mr skidz

I have run RSs to 28psi on a 3.0 with factory pipe work ( except ARC cooler, Z32 AFMs and modded TT pipe ) with no issue, holds boost @28psi perfectly to shut off, but power starts to fall over from around 7k through to the 8500 redline, which I have put down to the exhaust wheel/housing

but the 3.0 moves alot more gases @8k then a 2.8 which obviously moves more then a 2.6

Which brings me to my next point, what is the restriction, the T28 wheel or the 0.64 housing ?

If it is indeed the wheel then the larger housing won't do a great deal of anything to help power or response

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...