Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wana change my current turbo a t88-33d with 18cm housing to either a t51r kai or spl (depends on what i can get at a good price)

first up its on a stock capacity 2.6l but with all usual built bottom end and has some head work done aswell as a complete fuel system so it has all correct supporting mods

what i want to know is if i go and get the kai version will it make more power than my current turbo if they use the same boost level?

i dont want to go and buy the turbo n find out that it will still make the same power as i currently make.

i just love the sound of a t51r spooling up and t88's are quite an old turbo even tho mine has only done 13,000 kms

so yeh any help would be nice and i dont wana hear all the usual stuff like t51r shouldnt be on a 26 n its going to be laggy blah blah blah.

im used to lag with the t88, to me driving it around is still perfectly fine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/386919-turbo-change-same-power/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yeh that was kinda my understanding, i think the spl non ball bearing with 1.0 rear housing was rated to about 900hp but i couldnt find a definative answer on the kai.

i think my t88 is rated to 750-800 hp

How hard have you pushed the T88 you've got now? Tried the larger rear? If you havnt tried over 25psi or so, turn it up more before buying a new turbo :)

Edit; T88 ratings are pretty typical Japanese, eg they'll say "800hp engine" but there's guys here making nearly that at the wheels with them.

You aren't necessarily going to make anymore power unless the T88 was reaching its flow limit. Iirc the T88 is twin scroll, might be easier to go a GT4202R which is also twin scroll, sounds awesome an flows well :)

yeh its the 18cm housing on a 33d.

high boost is currently set at 25psi. it pushed out 427kw on uni group dyno when i just did a power run. figure seems quite low in my opinion, also as said above love the sound of a t51r coming on boost

may seem stupid but i want more power lol

If wanting more power is stupid, then a lot of us here are in trouble haha

It's worth moving max boost to 30psi for a run (Yavuz shouldnt need much convincing to do that haha), if that's not enough, try the larger reared 34D - that will put a smile on your dial. Or, when you're totally crazy, throw a GK on there.....i'll come watch that dyno run ;)

As nice as a T51R sounds, I'd be taking a GK over a T51R every day of the week. Who gives a shit about spooling noise when you're putting close to 1000rwhp to the floor

That does seem low. Is there other issues? Exhaust big enough? I doubt it's the turbo's fault....

i have a full 4" exhaust from turbo back so there is no restriction there.

cant run e85 as closest station to wollongong is heathcoate (half hour away)

yavous didnt tune the car either, croydon did, only did a power run at unigroup

As nice as a T51R sounds, I'd be taking a GK over a T51R every day of the week. Who gives a shit about spooling noise when you're putting close to 1000rwhp to the floor

Isn't a 38GK no better flowing than a T51R SPL BB but laggier? Haven't experienced both back to back but its certainly the impression I have from other results I have caught wind of.

no there will be no t62 r.

wonder if i should take it somewhere else to have a look at what they think bout the power level

have seen people with very similar set ups to mine making 460kw+

Isn't a 38GK no better flowing than a T51R SPL BB but laggier? Haven't experienced both back to back but its certainly the impression I have from other results I have caught wind of.

I dont know back to back either regarding response/lag. Surely a tiny bit more lag one way or the other when you're talking this amount of lag isnt going to make too much of a difference. Asking a friend of mine who knows all things T88, the GK has been proven to do 1000rwhp - I'm not sure, and not feeling well from NYE so not going in search of T51RSPLBB figures, but isnt the T62R the one that competes with those numbers? Im a twin turbo kind of guy so not up to date on every single turbo spec

Chris I asked that same person who knows all about T88's about your setup. He's very confident that turbo at 30psi and maybe a touch more will get 480kw, his one makes 460kw at 27psi. I asked if you were to change to hit 480/500kw what would he suggest. 34D 22cm was the answer and it will have more left in it for when you're tired of that number, but even the 22cm rear on the 33D should get there he said without any worries as long as the rest of the car is right.

Unigroup dyno isnt a high reading one, it's pretty common knowledge it's a bit of a low reader. They focus on getting the engine running perfectly and having great drivability rather than just a high figure and sending someone on their way out the door.

They focus on getting the engine running perfectly and having great drivability rather than just a high figure and sending someone on their way out the door.

This I like. It's what matters, unless using for dyno comps of course....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...