Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bit of a noob question but it needs to be asked.

Just realized when checking my tire pressure that I have two different sets of tires on my car, Playz PZ-1s on the left, and Playz PZ-X on the right...

Now I've been having issues with the left hand side, been thinking it was baring but Chris at Centerline in thomastown wasn't sure, said it might be tires as he was finding it difficult to get sound off the car when he lifted it.

Could that actually be apart of the problem?

It seems bizarre to me in the first place to put two rather different treads on either side of the car as wouldn't one side grip differently than the other?

I'm going to swap the PZ-Xs to the back tomorrow at my mate's as they seem to be in much better condition, the PZ-1s seem to be cracking at the edge of the treads.

Anyway, thoughts, ideas, experiences, insight?

Thanks,

Teir.

P.S,

If anyone generally knows what the difference between the Bridgestone Playz PZ-X and PZ-1s is that'd be good to know as well, they seem to both have rather different tread patterns.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387766-different-treads-either-side/
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that it's illegal to have 2 different tyres on the front? Or maybe that's on front wheel drives. And perhaps it would be better to put the best tyres on the front and the not so goods on the rear. Braking and steering is more important than going.

But hey... I'm still a noob.:rolleyes:

Edited by Not a Pulsar

oh that sucks....someone who owned your car in the past didn't give a shit about it :(

you definately want the same tyres on either side of the same axle....it might be expensive but I also always replace mine in pairs. The car must be consistent between left and right grip.

oh that sucks....someone who owned your car in the past didn't give a shit about it :(

you definately want the same tyres on either side of the same axle....it might be expensive but I also always replace mine in pairs. The car must be consistent between left and right grip.

It wasn't the last owner, it was Pedders who put them like that after repairing some accident damage 6+ months ago.

I never realized because they have practically the exact same logos on them in the same spots etc.

I was under the impression that it's illegal to have 2 different tyres on the front? Or maybe that's on front wheel drives.

It's a RWC requirement that each wheel on the same axle is the same make / brand / size / tread design. So, front tyres must be the same as each other, and rear tyres must be the same as each other, but front and rear don't have to be the same as each other.

Well then I've been driving risking a canary for the last 6+ months. Awesome. Thanks Pedders!

And to vareify as "Not a Pulsar" mentioned above, having a RWD would it be better to have the better looking tiers at the front or back? I was thinking the back as you want the traction on the running wheels.

OK. This is Australia, so we spell tyres with a y, not an i, and not as "tiers", which is the pulral of tier meaning "a level". Secondly, Better tyres alway go on the most important end of the car, which is the end that does the braking and STEERING. Thirdly, just pump them up to 34 psi and take it for a drive in the twisties. Then add 2 psi and do it again, then again. If it keeps getting better as you add pressure, then you should probably stop at about 38 psi. If it doesn't get better with more pressure, try less pressure. But FWIW, I generally use 32 psi or thereabout is normal tyres on boring cars, and upwards of 34 in good tyres on good cars. 38 psi in KU36s on R32.

OK. This is Australia, so we spell tyres with a y, not an i, and not as "tiers", which is the pulral of tier meaning "a level". Secondly, Better tyres alway go on the most important end of the car, which is the end that does the braking and STEERING. Thirdly, just pump them up to 34 psi and take it for a drive in the twisties. Then add 2 psi and do it again, then again. If it keeps getting better as you add pressure, then you should probably stop at about 38 psi. If it doesn't get better with more pressure, try less pressure. But FWIW, I generally use 32 psi or thereabout is normal tyres on boring cars, and upwards of 34 in good tyres on good cars. 38 psi in KU36s on R32.

I THOUGHT IT WAS TYRES! The f**kin auto correct kept disagreeing with me -_-

And I guess front it is!

As for pressure thanks for the tip, I'll start playing with it after I move them around. It's a 34 25gt but no one knows what the f**k the tyres are, if they're performance or not so just a matter of experimenting, thanks!

32 psi = R32

33 psi = R33

34 psi = R34 etc... pinch.gif

Front sounds like a good plan my man and if the bad ones are that bad, replace them asap and switch them all around again. ie new on front, old on back.

Edited by Not a Pulsar

Also, since I can't find anything on the net and there's no markings on the tiers does anyone know what I should be pumping my tiers upto?

255/45/17 Playz PZ-1

&

255/45/17 Playz PZ-X

The tyre installer should be able to recommend the best pressure. FWIW, my local Bob Janes suggested I run 38psi my Falken ZE912s (235/45x17).

It's a RWC requirement that each wheel on the same axle is the same make / brand / size / tread design. So, front tyres must be the same as each other, and rear tyres must be the same as each other, but front and rear don't have to be the same as each other.

Not so in nsw, they only have to be of the same construction on each axle, either radial, or cross ply.

Treads can differ, its just highly recommended that you don't.

  • 4 weeks later...

I'm someone who even hates having different brands on different axles... Makes the cars wander around if there is the slightest difference in how the different tyres are made.

+1 here, you should always try and run the same tread all round. The reason being that having a space saver spare means at some point you will need to put a rear on the front because you shouldnt put a space saver on the front. This is also why mixed fitments is a dumb idea

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...