Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you dont make it then just have the tuner create a good graph and claim it to be your own, thats my plan ;)

No cheating ya goose :P And you'll be fine with your setup

I wanna join :(

Fingers crossed the SS1PU can push me into the 300's with WMI or E70

I'm only just in the club at the moment as I'm on gate pressure :(

Anyone had Err 100 on a HKS EVC before? Seems to happen every time I give it a thrashing so I've switched it off :/

Yes, yes it is. Either that or it's the tune.

There are only two factors really, but im guessing it's a foot problem.

And my figures quoted earlier - that wasn't using the O2 sensor. That was with it disabled and the tune adjusted to suit.

or sensors are broken

or sensors are broken

if the sensors are f**ked (reading lean) the ecu reverts to the base fuel map, so if that's tuned properly you shouldn't get bad economy from busted sensors. The ecu only uses the o2 sensors to trim fuel on cruise, it'll never add more fuel than the base map.

if the sensors are f**ked (reading lean) the ecu reverts to the base fuel map, so if that's tuned properly you shouldn't get bad economy from busted sensors. The ecu only uses the o2 sensors to trim fuel on cruise, it'll never add more fuel than the base map.

Unless the sensors are telling the ecu its running lean so it adds fuel.

I have seen it alot. Unplugging the sensors then helps with fuel economy

DVS Tuning helped me

Join this club today .

At this point in time my 34 gtt sedan is making 353kw on eflex but howevet running out of fuel

Tune soon to be 100% completed once fuel system is upgraded again.

if the sensors are f**ked (reading lean) the ecu reverts to the base fuel map, so if that's tuned properly you shouldn't get bad economy from busted sensors. The ecu only uses the o2 sensors to trim fuel on cruise, it'll never add more fuel than the base map.

What if the coolant temp sensor is broken and constantly tells the ECU it is cold so it runs fuel enrichment and ignition retard? Definitely make a big difference to fuel economy!

Lol 34geeteetee I'm pretty sure err 100 is an open circuit. To test that have the car running at a time the Evc is working fine then unplug the solenoid. If it gives the same error thhen that means open circuit.

it would be doing.that when its hot coz the heat makes it expand and It must have a dry or cracked solder joint inside. Make sure it is far.from.the. exhaust and that the solenoid barbs point directly skyward.

also why.does it Sig say 360kw but u keep saying its in the process and are up to 300 odd? 2nd tune?

Thanks mate... Will hopefully get it sorted before Texi...

360kw was the highest run... It was run @ 357kw on the final tune for safety... The reason for the different power figures is the 3 boost levels and also the % of ethanol.... My power ranges from 311kw to 357kw depending in boost and E content :)

Hope that makes sense?

if the sensors are f**ked (reading lean) the ecu reverts to the base fuel map, so if that's tuned properly you shouldn't get bad economy from busted sensors. The ecu only uses the o2 sensors to trim fuel on cruise, it'll never add more fuel than the base map.

Duno what it is mate, its pretty f*ked getting 19-20L/100kms, will definitey have that issue addressed in the tune when I do a turbo upgrade/ tune. My new O2 sensor cannot be the prob, I was getting similar economy with the old one, the sensor is working ok because I do get better economy on long drives

Thanks mate... Will hopefully get it sorted before Texi...

360kw was the highest run... It was run @ 357kw on the final tune for safety... The reason for the different power figures is the 3 boost levels and also the % of ethanol.... My power ranges from 311kw to 357kw depending in boost and E content :)

Hope that makes sense?

In-car video showing the 34 boosting hard on full boost or its not true? Nah man but Im sure we would all love to see

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...