Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Just getting my head around the offset required for an R34 GTT. I've searched a few topics, got some ideas, but others tend to run different widths than I want to.

So I was thinking of getting a set of Lenso D1R's in the following size:

Front 18 x 8.5" - +35 offset

Rear 18 x 9" - +32 offset

Tyres i'd organise later, but probably something around 235 on the front and 255 on the rear.

I'd prefer NOT to get my guards rolled. Currently the car has stock suspension, and If I do lower it a bit, it'll be only with slightly lower springs, maybe 2cm lower... not sure on that yet.

Anyways, would that combo work ok?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/390656-r34-gtt-wheel-offset-advice/
Share on other sites

I run F: 8.5in +35

R: 9.5in +38

245's all round and lowered about 1.5 inches with no guard work

Fronts are a fairly flush fit with 245's but rears have a slight clearance for either 255's or lower offset. The specs you have listed should give you a good conservative fitment all round.

i got 9.5 +34 with 265 on the rears and my cars pretty low and they dont hit anything[unrolled guards]

Do you run coilovers? Have your rears scrubbed out when crabwalking really steep driveways? I want 265's on the rear now...

OK thanks guys... So nutting through each of your specs, seems i should have no rubbing issues with the offsets I've listed, on either the suspension or body.

It would seem that a 9" +32 is kind of in the middle of what you's are running... one being 9" +20 and 9.5" +38, so as you say, conservative fitment. Not too far in to put massive width on, but not too far out to need guard rolling, which i do not really want to do.

Awesome info thank you guys :)

you will be fine mate, from what i've read 34 GTR wheels (what Rush_ is running) are a good reference point for GTT fitment. Any higher offsets will be conservative.

9.5/10inch looks beast from the rear though ;)

FYI,

Stock 34 gtr rims are 18x9 +30

My rims are Grenade GX01's (gtr replicas) and are +20 (more aggressive offset) :D

FYI,

Stock 34 gtr rims are 18x9 +30

My rims are Grenade GX01's (gtr replicas) and are +20 (more aggressive offset) :D

My mistake...I remember looking at your car at the charity cruise and thinking the wheels looked to sit out a bit more than expected for GTR rims

OP, the standard GTT wheels are +40 offset I believe. Personally I think this is getting to the stage where the rim is too tucked. there is an offset thread somewhere maybe check that out?

Yeah i checked it out, but there's alot of people just rattling off there specs without a definitive idea on how it will sit. Everyone seems to have there own opinion on where the offset sits haha!

The way I see it though is this,

a 9.0" + 32 will sit about the same as a 9.5" +40.

Correct logic? A tyre place i rang recommends D1R's in 9.5" +40. I wonder how tucked in that will sit.

haha yeah it's one of those things you have to get your head around. I can definitely confirm 9.5in +38 on the rear is fine with a few mm to spare and no guard work (and my car is lowered). Maybe ask if you can do a test fitting?

Hmm OK so I've been using this calculator i found in the other thread:

http://marksink.com/tire_wheel_offset/offset.html

Interesting as it gives you an idea of how the new wheel will sit relative to what's there now.

I measured and there's over 50mm clearance between the original wheel and suspension.

Using that calculator,

a 9.0" +32 will mean the wheel is 11mm closer to the suspension and 27mm further out.

a 9.5" +40 will mean the wheel is 25mm closer to the suspension and 25mm further out.

So it would seem it makes more sense to run 9.5"'s because your using more of the available space, have a more aggressive wheel width and actually having less chance of it hitting the guard, being 2mm further inwards.

Opinions?

haha yeah it's one of those things you have to get your head around. I can definitely confirm 9.5in +38 on the rear is fine with a few mm to spare and no guard work (and my car is lowered). Maybe ask if you can do a test fitting?

Yeah i'm slowly understanding it! That calculator I linked above really helps as it shows you exactly where the wheel will sit.

I would test fit but I was buying these wheels online!

Edited by Shoujiki

but then you need to take in to account negative camber, etc. i have 18" x 9.5" +20 front and rear, and they fit very nice. could probably do with slightly wider rears, maybe 10's.

it all comes down to how bad ass you are :P i have a set of 18 x 10.5 +0 offset wheels for when im feeling really badass :P

I used to run...

[F] 18x8.5 +30 225/40R18

[R] 18x9.5 +35 255/35R18

Slightly lowered on coilovers with un-modified guards, never had an issue.

In saying that I was always dissapointed that I had spent over $4k on wheels and tyres and it was never really aggressive enough >_<

18x8.5" +30 on the front & 18x9.5" +38 on the rear for me (nismo lmgt4 rim)

Car is lowered to minimum legal in SA (about 345mm from middle of rim to guard). No issues at all on the rear with 255/35R18. Fronts are a tighter fit even with 245/40R18 - they scrub on full lock going over speed humps, driveways, etc. I'm probably going to raise the front a little to help that.

Thanks for the replies guys, it's great to have some direct information to work with.

I won't be lowering the car too much if i even do, so that shouldn't be an issue. The wheels will never be "in the arches" so :P Even though it looks awesome, for a road car that attracts attention as is, i want to maintain each part of this car legally!

Judging by the replies, i think i'll go for the 9.5" +40 rear wheels. I think it'll fill up the area nicer and still be within the limits of not scrubbing the arches. It's what 2 places have recommended so far. And probably run 235 at the front and 255 at the rear.

Even though 10+": would be awesome and super aggressive, i think i need to restrain and keep it a bit conservative! The GTR people must love the fact they fit big rubber in those wide guards with ease!

Thanks for the replies guys, much appreciated! cheers.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...