Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

your welcome Kozi

glad you had fun Allen

Great to hear guys had a blast - sadly I didn't make it at all as work went crazy and time well and truly got away from me :( .... I was busting to go for a passenger blast in Munro's R35GTR or Daniel's Radical as well :( .....

(Insert User Name Here) remember that most SAU:SA track days are not opened up to the general SAU community, so if you want to be guaranteed on future days you gotta join up :) ..... it is cheap and easy - and membership has it's benefits :D

www.sausa.com.au

for a fee of $35 and a once of administration fee of $15 we are the cheapest CAMS affiliated club in Australia, for that you members discounts at Willall Racing, Main North Nissan, Auto Barn - Mile End, Blackwood Tyrepower and various other places quickly see's your membership pay itself off

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

awesome day lads! Thanks to all the SAUSA guys that put in the effort to organise it. Passenger laps was a good idea! The S14 was only a second slower with the wife in the car 1:19.3, pulled a best 1:18.3 for the day (best optimal time was 1:17.77, best splits for the day combined). Definetly need some new rear tyres and a play with the wheel alignment settings though!

was wondering where you were, how's the car coming along?

Bloody work mate. Car is with another SAU member getting ready for the defect to be cleared. Once that's done, should be keen for the next track day.

Hey all

I took a little footage in the morning and made a quick vid.

New camera first time out with it, tried to get some practice in. long way to go lol

Mainly wanted to get my head around it before a holiday I'm off on, and sorry about my lack of editing skills.

Great pics!

I'd like to thank Adam from Holeshot and Luke from LTM for coming down for the day and being "official" SAU:SA photographers! Now support them guys and go buy some prints of the shots they have taken

Absolutely speing I couldn't make it for this one guys - same as a few others I was smashed with work and just couldn't get away :( .... I wasn't looking too bad, but then at 11am everything went haywire and I knew I was screwed for the day.

Looked like eveyone had an amazing time!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...