Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sounds like you may need to do a dummy build to check valve piston clearance.

The Tomei pistons will be valve relieved to suit and will be checked at HKS just before being sent over.

He might have a little bit of knowledge but if those inlet ports are polished (which they kind of look like they are) there are deficiencies in how that inlet port will perform... that is the bottom line, it is FACT! Whether he has built 10 engines or 100 means nothing. Plus the fact that this head also has +1.5mm inlet valves is a whole other issue...

I don't think it is right to continue this on Piggaz's thread, apologies mate. Marcus send me a PM or email if you like.

no way post it in here, i think everyone wants to here what you have to say, i sure do, gunna be good to watch you eat your words at the end of it all once its bolted togethor and put on the rollers......

He might have a little bit of knowledge but if those inlet ports are polished (which they kind of look like they are) there are deficiencies in how that inlet port will perform... that is the bottom line, it is FACT! Whether he has built 10 engines or 100 means nothing. Plus the fact that this head also has +1.5mm inlet valves is a whole other issue...

I don't think it is right to continue this on Piggaz's thread, apologies mate. Marcus send me a PM or email if you like.

Pm both of us !!

Polished ports - not ideal, but port shape/size is what really matters

guys back in the 60's experimented with chroming the inlet ports to a true mirror finish, didnt gain anything...but didnt really lose anything either

what I want to know is why is there a blob of what looks like weld attached to the valve guide in the inlet ports, and still using factory cast iron guides? or will they be removed after the porting is finished?

no way post it in here, i think everyone wants to here what you have to say, i sure do, gunna be good to watch you eat your words at the end of it all once its bolted togethor and put on the rollers......

No need to get defensive, anyone can PM me if they like.

I did not say it won't make power, etc... but the port looks polished from the photos. If it is, then in my opinion, it won't flow as well as it could at certain engine speeds. The +1.5mm intake valves might be an issue too, going too big a valve can hurt flow around the valve head at lift "valve shrouding"... the head of the valve can get too close to the cylinder wall.

Polished ports - not ideal, but port shape/size is what really matters

guys back in the 60's experimented with chroming the inlet ports to a true mirror finish, didnt gain anything...but didnt really lose anything either

what I want to know is why is there a blob of what looks like weld attached to the valve guide in the inlet ports, and still using factory cast iron guides? or will they be removed after the porting is finished?

Valve guides are JUN bronze items.

Mike it might just be the way the photo was taken.

I'm picking up the head ,pistons and a few other parts next Friday and will send Paul some pics.

Keep in mind this head was all machined by Naprec to their full racing specs and fitted with their bronze valve guides 1.5 over size forged valves and will spin 9,000rpm all day long.

All the port/polish and other work has been done at HKS by one of their top race engine builders.

This spec head is tried and tested in Japan and no problem with flow.

Sorry if came off as defensive but long flight yesterday and topped off with a nomihodai one could say things are a bit foggy this morning.

Anyway lets keep this on track as its all about Pauls new "Pig Monster"

When you look at the list of high powered engines this guy has developed in the last 15 years in Japan from the Drag33 to time attack engines down to current GTR35, you know he has got a little bit of knowledge of what he's doing, plus he's got the runs on the board having built literally 100's of race engines and high performance cars.

End of the day its the complete package that makes everything come together to give a car that has buckets of torque, great power delivery on low boost and isnt going to go bang.

Also you might want to have a real good look at a few other top Japanese engine builders like Jun etc and see what they do.

Are they doing it or have they done it wrong ??

These guys were pushing the boundries of the RB before most owners here were out of wetting their beds.

Its easy to say yes this is proven and thats proven but how many of you guys have built engines and own cars like these guys in Japan have built and still do.

Have you guys actually been and seen what the Jap top tuners build ???

For example in Australia how many 9 sec cars are there..Japan 10 years ago they were being pumped out left right and centre.

Nowdays hardly any and thats due to economic differences e.g Japan is going down the tube big time so nobody has the coin anymore.

Sadly the RB in Japan today is a dinasaur, alike to the old golden Holden 308 , yes parts are still available and the odd build still happens but this is due to just being for bread and butter money. The focus now and the in future is well and truly the GTR35.

At the end of the day you have to look at what Pauls building here. This is not a knuckledragger engine, its being built for all round high performance and high response so he can take it out to the circuit and go very quick but still enjoy a Sunday drive but have all sorts of anger under the loud pedal.

the rb is becoming a classic BUT what a classic it is :)

& yes the future for me will be the r35 as well - nowadays u can get them in the 90's so as soon as they a bit more, im onto it like a poo on blanket!!!

Off topic posts removed, this is Paul's thread, not advertising for a particular company.

Thanks guys

Thanks for letting me know.

Sorry of a bit O.T but I'm aware of another person with a high powered RB26 built by Racepace here that has had a N1 pump failure. He ended up rebuilding with a Tomei Oil pump. I'm also going to get a Tomei oil pump for my rebuild.

Anyone got any other suggestions of which pump to use?

Please do a search, there's literally dozens of threads on this throughout the forum.

Love the sound of those things :D, a little big for what I want out of the car :(

The goal is to make 450 kw BUT with 400 from 5000 RPM. I wasn't too far off with how it was before it went to heaven.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...