Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys,

About to build another track car and want to go down a different route to my current R32.

This one will be a rear wheel drive GTT with an RB26 in it.

I'm looking for a single turbo/manifold combo that will net around 370kws.

Motor will be kept pretty simple with a built bottom end, drop in poncams, very little headwork, running on E85.

Looking for 20psi by say 4000rpm.

Give me your thoughts please.

Edited by bri73y

Just so something similar to mine (See below) with a built engine and decent boost it should be fine and response will be exactly what your after..... BUT depends what you want to spend

This one will be a rear wheel drive GTT with an RB in it.

I'm looking for a single turbo/manifold combo that will net around 370kws.

Motor will be kept pretty simple with a built bottom end, drop in poncams, very little headwork, running on E85.

Looking for 20psi by say 4000rpm.

If I were building exactly the same thing, going by the things I've seen out and about these days - I'd go for a single entry FP GT3076R HTA with .82a/r hot side on a 6boost manifold.

There should be no surprises, its based on the existing Garrett GT30 platform which is long proven to be reliable, and has a better matched compressor on it that the "normal" out going 56 trim GT3076R (let alone the GTX3076R) while also providing a higher flow rate. The combination has been around for a number of years now, proven to "make the numbers", and there is no debate that they actually spool and respond quicker than the normal GT3076R (which would already be a reasonable option to consider). Realistically you'd be looking at more power than GT3076R while being closer in spool and transient response to the smaller GT3071R.

http://store.forcedp...TGT3076HTA.html

I'd say your 370kw on E85, and 20psi by 4000rpm should be pretty achieveable with that combination - potentially with change.

The FP turbos do look like an awesome option!!!

Why the 370rwkw target?

EDIT - Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh it says RB26 now................. Ill shuddup then lol ;)

If I were building exactly the same thing, going by the things I've seen out and about these days - I'd go for a single entry FP GT3076R HTA with .82a/r hot side on a 6boost manifold.

There should be no surprises, its based on the existing Garrett GT30 platform which is long proven to be reliable, and has a better matched compressor on it that the "normal" out going 56 trim GT3076R (let alone the GTX3076R) while also providing a higher flow rate. The combination has been around for a number of years now, proven to "make the numbers", and there is no debate that they actually spool and respond quicker than the normal GT3076R (which would already be a reasonable option to consider) but probably closer in spool and response to the smaller GT3071R while making more power.

http://store.forcedp...TGT3076HTA.html

I'd say your 370kw on E85, and 20psi by 4000rpm should be pretty achieveable with that combination - potentially with change.

Thanks, sounds on the money.

The FP turbos do look like an awesome option!!!

Why the 370rwkw target?

370kw + 1150kg or thereabouts will net a reasonably quick track car that shouldn't break too many things by being overpowered/stressed.

Not only that but this car will be rwd so I want good linear power that doesn't create too many drivability/traction issues.

I've learnt the hard way that the more you push the power the more you have to upgrade/fix, I don't want to have to do that with this car.

Anyone have a cheap alternative to the FP ??

How much are you willing to compromise cheap vs performance?

There are cheaper turbos than the HTA which may perform in a similar territory, though they rely on twin scroll partly to boost natural torque and exhaust efficiency to get the "wider" performance - ie, something like a Holset HX35.

Alternatively, there is the Kando Dynamics T67 turbo SimonR32 uses on his R32 which will also make the power, but is likely to introduce more lag (though to be fair, an RB26 in a car weighing 1150kg will probably cover that up) than the other options I mentioned and probably have a "snappier" nature, 20psi @ 4000rpm possible but I wouldn't want to guarantee it.

Any of the options mentioned will get you in the territory of 370kw and 20psi by 4000rpm, GT3582R being most likely to fall short of your response requirements but more than capable of the power, GT3076R working hardest to reach the target power but one of the most responsive.

Precision turbo. Im going to try a 6262 and hoping to have a fair amount of response. Otherwise a slightly smaller size may be best

:O PT6262 would be epic lols on a RB26 track car on E85, though not so sure its what he's looking at. Probably 4500+rpm for full boost, but potential for >450kw would be amusing in an 1150kg RWD track car hahahah

Hell yeah it would be fun. Sorry i thought his was a GTR. I missed the GTT part

I did the opposite in the first post, i originally saw GTT but there was no RB26..... So my posts are useless (As usual) :woot:

If you're running E85, I'd run no less than 10:1 compression pistons and go with a BorgWarner EFR 8374 .92.

I've been down the EFR road, and for some strange reason,........I think I'll try a different road this time...... :wacko:

Thanks for your input so far guys, most appreciated!

How much are you willing to compromise cheap vs performance?

There are cheaper turbos than the HTA which may perform in a similar territory, though they rely on twin scroll partly to boost natural torque and exhaust efficiency to get the "wider" performance - ie, something like a Holset HX35.

Alternatively, there is the Kando Dynamics T67 turbo SimonR32 uses on his R32 which will also make the power, but is likely to introduce more lag (though to be fair, an RB26 in a car weighing 1150kg will probably cover that up) than the other options I mentioned and probably have a "snappier" nature, 20psi @ 4000rpm possible but I wouldn't want to guarantee it.

Any of the options mentioned will get you in the territory of 370kw and 20psi by 4000rpm, GT3582R being most likely to fall short of your response requirements but more than capable of the power, GT3076R working hardest to reach the target power but one of the most responsive.

I was budgeting (because this is a budget build, spent all my money on my bloody R32) on about $2000 for Turbo and Manifold if possible.

you arent going to get a garrett turbo and a manifold for 2k, 2.5-3k will get you a 6boost/ETM manifold and a gt35 but the GT30's are more expensive than the GT35's, unless you can get someone elses setup 2nd hand.

a racecar on a budget is going to break things, cheap stainless manifolds expect them to warp and crack, cheap nasty turbos, expect them to be extra laggy and or blow up.

I've been down the EFR road, and for some strange reason,........I think I'll try a different road this time...... :wacko:

Thanks for your input so far guys, most appreciated!

Hehe i knew that reply was coming :D

GT3076 on E85 has been proven to around 330-340rwkw on E85 or the HTA variant for something better again

you arent going to get a garrett turbo and a manifold for 2k, 2.5-3k will get you a 6boost/ETM manifold and a gt35 but the GT30's are more expensive than the GT35's, unless you can get someone elses setup 2nd hand.

a racecar on a budget is going to break things, cheap stainless manifolds expect them to warp and crack, cheap nasty turbos, expect them to be extra laggy and or blow up.

Do most people buy their GT3582s from GCG? There are so many GT35Rs out there - hard to know where to buy the best option from!

I run a standard RB25 with the Kinugawa T67-25g 10cm that make 360rwkw and does regular track work and it fits all your criteria. 20psi well before 4000rpm, near enough to the power you're asking and it's cheap $750 delivered plus a $1200 decent manifold.

Your other options are a GT3076R which will be a tiny bit better spool and a tiny bit less top end for an extra $1000 or maybe a bastardised version of one for similar price.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...