Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys I'm new to this forum,

Ok iv purchased an rb30 block, it's been deck,honed, blue printed, balanced ,

New stock rb30 rods, race bearings, acl dura light pistons ra9301y 1.00 rib 0.025

Iv got a rb25det neo head that I plan on using for the build, I'm wondering what head gasket

I should use? Any info would be great please.

Did you know that the Neo head has approx 10cc smaller combustion chambers than the normal RB25 head and that you must therefore use suitable pistons, not the same pistons that you would use for a normal 25 head? If you don't, compression will be sky high.

  • Like 1

^^^ Exactly.

IIRC Neo heads have approximately 50-51cc chambers. R32/R33 RB25 and RB26 heads have 62-64cc chambers. This difference will shoot your static C.R. into the 10's if you dont get pistons suited to this head. That might be OK if your running E85 or race fuel, but definitely not on 98.

Read the RB30 thread and associated RB30 DOHC pdf. Its there for a reason.

It even states the brand of head gasket recommended for this build by many others on the forum. Im sure if you searched the R33 RB30 conversion thread, you might even get a part number.

Has anyone done the calcs to see what the static CR would be with a Neo head on a std RB30E or RB30ET short engine ?

I have wanted to, just haven't found the details regarding the OEM RB30 pistons. TBH I havent looked that hard as I already have a built RB30. But one day I wouldn't mind swapping the motor out to use the Neo head :yes:

From memory when I disassembled my RB30, the RB30 OEM pistons have a dome but to what extent (cc wise) I'm unsure.

Attached is my own calculator I used to work out my RB30's static C.R. Bare in mind, I used all metric units. So some converting may be required.

static compression ratio calculator.xls

If anyone can shed some light on the OEM RB30 piston specs, would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by R32Abuser

Ok but I've just read a tread where a guy is doing the same build. And has used the exact same pistons as me. The acl rb30et pistons with 1.1mm head gasket and it gave him a 8. Something compression ratio. I've seen 2 different forums where guys doing this build have used the same pistons that I am

How can you expect an answer unless you give all the information including which pistons have been used and you have cc'ed the head?

Everyone will be guessing about your final comp ratio.

Just read the first post again (are the pistons you have listed 30ET pistons?)

Edited by wolverine

At the start of this post I put what my build was. Pistons etc. yes they are rb30et acl pistons . I haven't flow tested the head yet but guessing it will be around the same as every other factory rb25det neo head

Hey theres nothing wrong with using a neo head I know I have.

I used ACL 8.5:1 pistons on my 1st motor and Mahle 8.5:1's on my second. On the second I decked the head and also decked the block to a 0 deck height. standard nissan rb25 head gasket & I also run BP98 with no problems. I don't think you will have any problems unless your trying to put 65 psi of boost into it. but hey thats just my experience so far.

I wish I had a Neo head. With stock pistons and the 33 head my compressions are 132psi (leak down test is fine) so I am guessing about 8:1 if I'm lucky. Only making 230-awkw at 15psi so soon to be retuned to 25 psi or as much as poss till it stops making more power (GT3540). I'm using a Tomei metal head gasket.

I wish I had a Neo head. With stock pistons and the 33 head my compressions are 132psi (leak down test is fine) so I am guessing about 8:1 if I'm lucky. Only making 230-awkw at 15psi so soon to be retuned to 25 psi or as much as poss till it stops making more power (GT3540). I'm using a Tomei metal head gasket.

Likewise.

Only thing I would change about my build.

In a perfect world a compact chamber with a flat or slightly dished piston giving the desired static CR and stopping approx 25 though short of the heads deck face works pretty well . IMO the dama is people using all kinds of weird and wonderful ways to get the CR they want ie thicker or thinner head gaskets . Few of these methods works best and ends up being a compromise . Making changes the worst possible ways can actually give you a low compression ratio engine thats not very detonation resistant .

I think if you could emulate a Neo engines pistons and static CR with a deeper dish or whatever you'd have a pretty good solution in a Neo RB30DET .

I would have thought by now plenty of people would have buretted std RB30E and ET pistos to get those volumes . Getting either engine to top dead center and placing a feeler gauge between the piston edge and a steel rule across the bore is not exactly rocket science .

I bet plenty an RB26 engine builder would have loved smaller chambers and flat or dished pistons .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...