Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats the most awful thing I have ever heard... in fact, I think my ears are bleeding!

Dont be dodgy! Buy a short shifter (slightly shorter length) or put up with it!

grrrrrrr :hellpisd:

Christian

BE WARNED!!!

To all dont try cutting down the std gearstick as its hollow and filled with rubber, you will end up with two pieces and not much else!Also i would not recommend using a short shifter as you will lunch the gearbox as i did in my 96 ser II.not being a harsh driver it came as a big surprise that my box was f----d and needed a complete rebuild.So please all be warned.

Regards,

SKYLINE.....(KYM)

To ALL,

the std gear stick is hollow and filled with a rubber type of material,hence it cannot be suscessfully cut down.Also note that using a short shifter in you box will increase your chances of lunching the syncros.Even tho i drive reasonbly hard im easy on my equipment and i thoroughly lunched the box so that it req'd a complete rebuild--- so be warned!!!

Regards,

SKYLINE...(Kym).

if you have a non GTR, upgrade to a GTR gearstick, its a tad shorter and the throw is lesser too.

Cutting a gear stick is not a big deal, don't overdo it though or you'll end up wrecking your gearbox. the shorter the distance between the tip and the fulcrum the more pressure it will exert on the gearbox when you change gears. Also since its not a short shift kit the throw will be the same, which means you'll have to move the knob slightly less than stock if you cut it.

A better idea would be to find a thread tapper of the same dimensions as the thread on your gear stick, and dirll a hole then add a thread to your gearknob (just make sure you don't com out the other side). effectively it'll shorten the height of your gearknob.

I have a mate who bought a Series II GTS and it has a cut down stick. He curses it everyday and is looking for a stock one to refit.

can i ask why?

I had a cut down gear stick which I replaced with the C's short shifter. The throw is about the say but the C's shaft is taller so it's not as "comfortable" to drive with...(yeah I'm lazy)...I reckon if I cut about 1.5-2 inches off the C's shaft it'd be close to the short throw on the MX-5.

Matts outta control.

I thought the throw on my Cs is alot shorter than the stocker. If you compare the two, the fulcrum point is moved, and the part of the stick above the pivot point is alot shorter than the stocker (about 1-2 inches from memory). This has the added advantage of meaning the throw is reduced further. It is a true quickshifter, not a shortened shifter.

Minimal movement of the hand equates to maximum result at the other end (fill your boots Matt)

BE WARNED!!!

   To all dont try cutting down the std gearstick as its hollow and filled with rubber, you will end up with two pieces and not much else!Also i would not recommend using a short shifter as you will lunch the gearbox as i did in my 96 ser II.not being a harsh driver it came as a big surprise that my box was f----d and needed a complete rebuild.So please all be warned.

         Regards,

                      SKYLINE.....(KYM)

I have a C's short shifter in my R33. I've been racing, dragging and general driving it for 2 years now and the gearbox is still fine....so don't blame the short shifter.

I'm with MarkG the throw is shorter but the lever itself is still too long

  • 2 weeks later...

Many Short Shifters work by increasing the pivot point of the shaft that goes into the gearbox locator. They lengthen the shaft that goes into the gearbox. This will increase the height of the actual gear stick because you need spacers to raise the whole gear shifter so that the end of the extended shaft can fit into the gearbox locator.

It is recommeneded that you run a high quality sythetic oil, such as REDLINE MTL so that all the components can be better lubricated for easier shifts. IF you cut the standard shaft, or not making a true short shifter, as the pivot point is exactly the same . Nothing is shorter as the arc length has not changed. The end result is a notchy shifter that will break your box because you will be banging it in gear all the time.

Your car, your property, but if you value you car and want to save money in the long run, put up with the longer shifter otherwise enjoy notchy shifts and gearbox rebuilds :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...