Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks mate... I've just spent an hour on the phone talking GT30 options :thumbsup:

You are now the 3rd person I've heard from who has experienced this problem with the HKS GT-RS (was it RB25?rwkw?)

The plot thickens...

Well there you go. Another GTRS bending flanges.

That pic that you posted was a pretty spectacular effort!

Get a GT30 :D

Whatever dude...

My last post was an update not a cry for help, although I do value most opinions and feedback.

What am I supposed to do listen to a bunch of keyboard mechanics (and critics) over my experienced tuner and ATP?

Do you really think you know more about it than these guys?

Don't loose your cool dude, you asked for help and suggestions and they were given in good spirits. no one here seems to be making a name for themselves at your expense. we may not be able to give you the silver bullet you were looking for but it seems to have come out in the wash for you anyway.

lithium and r31 nismoid seem to have the right approach in that if you want to know exactly what is causing this, someone will need to instigate some trial and error. you could start with some of their suggestions to satisfy yourself and rule them out.

good luck with finding the right turbo for your needs and i hope to see you at the track sometime.

Out of curiosity, Is it more severe at certain tracks?

I haven't read every reply, but do not pull timing as some are saying to do. I'd be logging it again while on the track. It would be best to richten It up slightly (say two or three points) before hand, pull 2psi of boost, and then ADD some timing (maybe 4 degrees, whatever your tuner is happy with).This will definitely reduce exhaust temps, and likely increase transient response and 'feel' too.

Unfortunately there is nothing that can be done for the tune. If only it were that simple.

With a turbo that small, making the power he does, means adding timing will make it ping. Reducing timing to stop the pinging will add heat and making it rich will do stuff all.

THIS TURBO IS TOO SMALL FOR TRACK APPLICATIONS.

For a street car, not a problem. Probably the most responsive upgrade to the factory setup you can hope for. I spent a fair bit of time talking with CB on the phone and talking with his tuner (who is extremely switched on and has many track and drag cars under his belt) but the simple fact is that you cannot get the gas to flow out of a turbine housing that small and make as much power for extended periods.

Not sure if it's been mentioned already but it's making 245rwkw so I am told

All heat is going to gather at the entry to the scroll where the housing begins. It's warping the manifold and the turbo but only at the flange face. It doesn't warp the face of the manifold against the head.

The ONLY way to stop it from warping is to reduce the power or change to a higher flowing turbine/housing combination

  • 4 months later...

This has been an interesting read...

I've been running a HKS GT-RS turbo for at least the last 6 years, I haven't experienced any of the warping mentioned in this thread, though my car hasn't hit the track to really push the setup.

I'm in the process of fitting a tuned length exhaust manifold with external wastegate, so the internal wastegate of the turbo will be locked shut. I'm wondering if you did this option would it fix this issue of the turbine housing warping?

The reason I'm thinking it could help with this excess heat issue, is that wastegate gasses are going to be diverted to the external wastegate before going through the turbine housing... Less gasses go through the housing, less pressure buildup at that point and less heat. Thoughts?

Could Add a big external gate to the housing, should help relieve some manifold pressure and let it breath.

Or bigger turbo as eeryone has suggested.

One other thing, what spark plugs are u running?

External gate and a larger exhaust manifold would help a little by giving more volume of metal to heat soak, would also reduce friction ever so slightly. Might be enough to stop it, might not.

I hate to be Mr obvious but the only person who is really qualified to answer this question already has:

"THIS TURBO IS TOO SMALL FOR TRACK APPLICATIONS." (i.e on an RB25)

You have been warned... but maybe PM Daniel (@ERD) and ask him what he thinks, he is a very helpful and knowledgeable guy.

IMO the tuned length exhaust manifold will have less mass and be a less effective heat sink than the OEM cast item, it will therefore warp easier as well as costing a lot more money to replace.

Get a GT30 and then wonder why you ever bothered with the GT-RS...

Checkbuzz I realise this is you originally started this thread, but you clearly do not understand the concept of what is being done to my car with the GTRS...

Rather than quoting the one line that Elite Racing has written that you obviously love: THIS TURBO IS TOO SMALL FOR TRACK APPLICATIONS, how about you read this part of what he has said "All heat is going to gather at the entry to the scroll where the housing begins. It's warping the manifold and the turbo but only at the flange face." and consider that all my wastegate gasses are going to be diverted to the wastegate prior to this point.

You have no idea what background people have on here, so rubbishing every one's qualifications (to comment) other than your bosom buddy Elite Racing is a little delinquent.

I understand the concept plenty... but you sound like you're looking for the answer that suits what you want to do anyway.

Good luck with that!

Checkbuzz I realise this is you originally started this thread, but you clearly do not understand the concept of what is being done to my car with the GTRS...

Rather than quoting the one line that Elite Racing has written that you obviously love: THIS TURBO IS TOO SMALL FOR TRACK APPLICATIONS, how about you read this part of what he has said "All heat is going to gather at the entry to the scroll where the housing begins. It's warping the manifold and the turbo but only at the flange face." and consider that all my wastegate gasses are going to be diverted to the wastegate prior to this point.

You have no idea what background people have on here, so rubbishing every one's qualifications (to comment) other than your bosom buddy Elite Racing is a little delinquent.

Rolls, you misunderstand what I'm doing. The manifold and external gate is going on to make the car as responsive as possible. I don't track my car, so warping of the GT-RS turbine flange isn't a concern for me. I'm just curious to know whether this could prevent the warping issue. I was after some intelligent discussion, though this is hard to find on here at times.

I would suggest the amount of mass of metal in the manifold would have little effect on what happens. The simple fact is that the flow from all 6 is aimed at the collector/flange. If there is a nasty restriction down there (the hot side of the turbo) then the pressure will be high, the temperature will increase (because the pressure is high). Less restriction is the answer.

Rolls, you misunderstand what I'm doing. The manifold and external gate is going on to make the car as responsive as possible. I don't track my car, so warping of the GT-RS turbine flange isn't a concern for me. I'm just curious to know whether this could prevent the warping issue. I was after some intelligent discussion, though this is hard to find on here at times.

Oh fair call, I mixed you and the OP up. Tbh external gate and bigger manifold would probably decrease the response of the turbo, but it will flow better and make more power.

Oh fair call, I mixed you and the OP up. Tbh external gate and bigger manifold would probably decrease the response of the turbo, but it will flow better and make more power.

Due to the collector design it has increased the response of the turbo, it now has response as good as the stock turbo ~ 5 psi of boost at 2000 rpm and full boost before 3000 rpm. Due to the temperature today I was unable to get a full tune completed, however with the new setup it has achieved 235 rwkw at 14 psi. On the same dyno last year it put down 230 rwkw at 18 psi (on a colder day) - So the results so far have been quite positive.

IMG_0450_zpse15bee78.jpg

Edited by Ryno

Do you have a dyno comparison showing the increased spoolup/response? You will get better power due to less restriction, eg at 14psi it is probably flowing close to what it did at 18psi.

I would be sceptical of it making the 18psi earlier with the aftermarket gate + manifold earlier than the stock one, you can't compare 14psi and 18psi as "full boost" at the same time as its a different pressure!

Edited by Rolls

Do you have a dyno comparison showing the increased spoolup/response? You will get better power due to less restriction, eg at 14psi it is probably flowing close to what it did at 18psi.

I would be sceptical of it making the 18psi earlier with the aftermarket gate + manifold earlier than the stock one, you can't compare 14psi and 18psi as "full boost" at the same time as its a different pressure!

Once I get it tuned for 18 psi I'll put up an overlay so the comparison is evident. The manifold I have used utilises 1" runners and merges into a collector that smashes the turbo and provides the increased spooling.

Looking at a dyno graph for my previous setup, the GT-RS hit 5 psi at 2700 rpm... So a 700 rpm improvement is pretty cool.

1" runners is damn small!

Also, when at the track I always let the car idle up good and proper which gets heat through everything in the engine bay and spend the first two laps gradually building loads and revs as I warm up tyres and brakes. The thermal shock things get when you blast them from near cold with 800deg C exhaust gases until they glow red and then shut it down to click and tick itself cold...is never going to be good . Even if thats not the source of your problems it is a good practice on a car that is tracked

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...