Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i've had some falken ziex tyres in the past. not sure if exactly the same ones, but i know that they were the worst tyre i've ever driven on in the wet, even when relatively new.

so i'm guessing that it's a mix of shit tyres and going too fast into the round about.

before i got new tyres on my wagon i could go into a wet round about at about 35kmh, light constant throttle and then just use the steering wheel to get the back out should i so choose to. all it would take is a small sudden adjustment. all it would take was moving my hand from say 5 o'clock to 6 o'clock.

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My 2 cents:

  1. Running 265's in the rear and 235's upfront is a significant offset difference for the wheel track. This needs to be compensated for in your driving style. But by the sounds of things you don't have a huge amount of skill.
  2. I think you're running too much negative camber in the rear, the tyres look okay, but I can see more wear on the inside, this means that you do not have the maximum contact patch when cornerning.
  3. When you approach a corner, do you have what is known as "viscious turn in"? I do get a little hardcore on the turn in when I want sideways action, or when I am getting over zealous at the track. Try to be smooth with your steering inputs.
  4. Slow in, fast out. Great words that should be applied to every corner.
  5. Are you taking into account the camber of the road when cornering. Negative effects of camber on corner ability are amplified in the wet.
  6. Wet roads (especially freshly wet roads) are usually very oily as well.

My advice:

  1. Get suspension setup properly
  2. Drop to a 255 rear end, unless you seriously need 265's for traction, don't go any wider than you need to.
  3. Do a defensive driving course, then a track day.
  4. Never ride a motorbike, shit will get ugly in a biblical way

advice noted , with time I will do all of the above

So, treadwear 360, old, and Ziex are known to be crap (not surprising at treadwear 360!). Strong evidence your problem is that the tyres have no grip.

wtf is treadwear 360?

Did anyone notice the manufacture date of the tyres? End of 2008.

How long ago did you buy the tyres?

I try to buy tyres that are no older than 6 months since they were made.

i've had some falken ziex tyres in the past. not sure if exactly the same ones, but i know that they were the worst tyre i've ever driven on in the wet, even when relatively new.

so i'm guessing that it's a mix of shit tyres and going too fast into the round about.

before i got new tyres on my wagon i could go into a wet round about at about 35kmh, light constant throttle and then just use the steering wheel to get the back out should i so choose to. all it would take is a small sudden adjustment. all it would take was moving my hand from say 5 o'clock to 6 o'clock.

same , just a slight twitch of the wheel was all it took for all hell to break loose

So, treadwear 360, old, and Ziex are known to be crap (not surprising at treadwear 360!). Strong evidence your problem is that the tyres have no grip.

a

h , didnt know ziex where known to be crap

Kumho ku36's then?

again , whats treadwear 360?

Tread wear rating is what the tyre manufactures use to rate the hardness of the rubber, higher the number the harder the tyre (in general terms)

hmm google is our friend....so apparently treadwaear is completely relative to each manufacturer..ie only allows you to compare among the same manufacturer not across all brands

in anycase , nice bit of info to know.

oh well , ku36's all round then.

hmm google is our friend....so apparently treadwaear is completely relative to each manufacturer..ie only allows you to compare among the same manufacturer not across all brands

I dont agree with that. While there are issues with treadwear as a measure, its still a useful ballpark indicator across brands.

Here's some numbers i just made up;

<40 = slicks

60-100 = r spec

140-200 = s spec

200-300 = street tyres

300+ = long life street tyres not much grip

As a gross generallisation, low treadwear is associated with good grip and short life, and high treadwear is associated with long life and poor grip.

ok its the tyres

if you look on the Tyres you use(d) and how u would rate them youl see that the ziex comes up again and again as so bad in the wet that its dangerous...

f**kn hell ,how are they even allowed to sell tyres this dangerous? It rained again tonight , took it really easy but I could feel the tyres where starting to lose grip.

I put my foot down ever so slightly when at the lights and the rears started to spin on the spot. Camrys and kias where taking a corner way faster then me and most where overtaking.

This tyre is so bad its embarrassing, there should be a sticky in the tyre section to never ever EVER EVER EVER purchase any Falken Ziex of any model.Ever. F*ck you Falken.

Edited by tripsteady

I empathise with you.

I once bought some wheels for my 4WS VTiR Prelude. They were shod with Nankang S Sh!tt

Anyway, on a wet night, I followed a Vectra (FWD) around a sweeper at 50Km/Hr and my car lost all traction. The tyres were near new. I thought WTF.

I went to Blair's Tyres who are agents for Nankangs. Nankang Aust branch was very obliging after checking the date on the wall.

They were so kind, they gave me a brand new set of the same tyre that slipped just as badly on the next wet night !!!

If I had looked in the rear vision mirror as I took off, I wonder if I would have seen some tyre man 'crossing' himself?

I empathise with you.

I once bought some wheels for my 4WS VTiR Prelude. They were shod with Nankang S Sh!tt

Anyway, on a wet night, I followed a Vectra (FWD) around a sweeper at 50Km/Hr and my car lost all traction. The tyres were near new. I thought WTF.

I went to Blair's Tyres who are agents for Nankangs. Nankang Aust branch was very obliging after checking the date on the wall.

They were so kind, they gave me a brand new set of the same tyre that slipped just as badly on the next wet night !!!

If I had looked in the rear vision mirror as I took off, I wonder if I would have seen some tyre man 'crossing' himself?

lol , its not a good feeling losing traction when you dont expect to....Im avoiding the rain until I get my new tyres. Hoping i get can my hands on some toyo t1rs.Have only heard consistently good things about them.

question, is this turning left or right on a roundy or just going straight through?

Stiff suspension, lots of camber/bad alignment and hard tyres could be causing this problem.

^^as above

also when lowering a car you'll get more wheel spin off the line as there is more neg camber on the rear meaning less tyre to the road. try lowering you tyre pressure to 30 or so for more rear grip

when its raining next i recommend you get out to your local free drivers training area and practice a low speed donut

best road tyres I've ever used are toyo t1 r/s + pirelli p zero nero, pricey f**kers but.

Also used Kuhmo KU36 pretty decent tyre for the price but I found they wore down pretty quick compared to the above

You're better off getting a set of Bridgestone Turzana tyres which will be better in the wet and are more of a grand touring tyre than the KU36's.

KU36s are extremely good in the dry, and not that great in the wet.

You're better off getting a set of Bridgestone Turzana tyres which will be better in the wet and are more of a grand touring tyre than the KU36's.

My old man has these on his Mazda 6 and dare I say it it grips a hell of a lot better than my 32. they feel really safe in the wet, but for the price you are probably better off getting more of a performance tyre.

I run KU36's but because I don't drive the GTR that much in the rain.

You're better off for a KU31 as a street tyre. KU36's are really designed to be a high performance street which means it will be better in the dry than wet. The KU31 is more all rounder.

Also the NSW club get's federal 959ss and RS-R's for bloody cheap on our member price. You'd probably save the membership fee on a full set with change to spare.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...