Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I've developed a problem in my C34 series 2 rs4s. When changing from 1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd at high revs it seems to grind/crunch. It's worse 1st to 2nd than 2nd to 3rd. Not sure if it does it 3rd to 4th as I'd be doing about 160km/h at that change and public roads tend to not let you go that fast haha. Just cruising around town with normal changes there is no issue whatsoever. I don't notice any clutch slippage at all. Any ideas from anyone would be great. Syncro's or clutch?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/410205-gearbox-or-clutch/
Share on other sites

Its not a slipping clutch that would cause a problem but lack of disengagement. If you are sitting at rest in gear and you let the pedal up slowly does it bite very early or come up quite a way? If it bites too early check for fluid levels and leaks. If its ok most probably your synchros are worn.

It bites fairly early. I had the clutch adjusted by a workshop when they did a full service on it about 8000ks ago as I was making a weird noise. Now that I think of it the box was doing a similar thing then but nowhere near as bad. The noise and crunching/grinding went away after a few weeks. The concrete in the carport is bone dry so I don't think it's a leak.

As for what clutch is in it, I have no idea and there's a longish story that goes with that which ends with me still not knowing what clutch it is. I'll hazard a guess and say stock or something similar.

If synchros, what would be the fix? Full box rebuild? Or can you just replace synchros and freshen up the rest?

Also, why would it be completely fine one day then start doing this the next? I could understand if I was smashing through gears and missed a change that resulted in grinding a gear but I haven't done that at any time around the issue developing.

Cheers guys.

The synchros in the Stagea settled down after I pissed off the cushioned button clutch and changed to an NPC organic.

There is some talk that you can load it up in the gear in question and gently slip the clutch off the line to de-glaze the synchros but I have no idea is this is an inspired or stupid idea. If it works it certainly saves a box R&R.

As I said it's done it before (not quite this bad) then stopped and it's been fine for ages until now.

A gearbox rebuild is not the next mod I had planned!! Haha. If it has to be, it has to be I guess.

Might take it to a mechanic or gearbox joint if it doesn't settle down over the next couple of weeks.

Thanks guys.

By adjusted I mean I asked them to diagnose/fix the clutch noise while they were doing the service. They couldn't diagnose the noise without dropping the box out to actually inspect the clutch but did find that the free play was all up the shit so they adjusted that. I believe that was pretty much what the invoice said. I'll try and find the invoice tomorrow (am at work atm) to check what fluid they used. I believe it'd be right tho as they know their turbo cars. They get a lot of Skylines through and specialize in Subaru's.

you should probably change the gearbox oil at 100,000kms anyway

get something good and synthetic and it may help keep them going

also, making sure that the revs are matched between shifts will lessen the crunching too as the synchro's will be working less

edit: probably don't use redline as its been known to glaze synchros from over-lubrication

Edited by pipster11

So I found the invoice and they defintiely drained and replaced the gearbox fluid. Valvoline 75W-90 is what went in I believe. And that was only about 8-9000ks ago. I guess i could get some Redline and throw that in to see if it helps. From what i've been reading (in the skyline section and other places on the interwebs) that's what most poeple are saying to do. As for Redline glazing the synchros from over lubrication, if they're already fu@#ed I don't see the harm.

Keep the ideas coming if there is anymore.

Thanks

Edited by BMX666

http://www.toymods.o...proof-r154.html

I'd read that first

and from redline themselves:

LightWeight ShockProof™

A unique gear oil designed to lubricate racing transmissions and transaxles which see serious loads (not recommended for most syncro-type transmissions)

Edited by pipster11

you should probably change the gearbox oil at 100,000kms anyway

get something good and synthetic and it may help keep them going

also, making sure that the revs are matched between shifts will lessen the crunching too as the synchro's will be working less

edit: probably don't use redline as its been known to glaze synchros from over-lubrication

I have worked in an engineering trade for over 20 years, and have never heard of this "Glazing" of synchro rings. Frankly it sounds like bollocks to me.

Can you provide an example (not just an anecdotal forum quote from an unconfirmed source) of how lubricating oil can cause the surface of a toothed bronze ring to "glaze"? And why would this "glazing" prevent a bronze ring from engaging with a steel gear.?

Using an oil grade that's too thick can cause synchro issues (much like cold oil in a gearbox) but the number of people who swear by Redline Lightweight Shockproof in Skylines and Supras (both well known for being notchy) suggest that this alleged "glazing" might just be a wives tale.

The synchro ring is essentially a freewheeling gear on the shaft, and it assists the gears in matching speed before engagement; if it is effectively locked to the shaft by a very thick oil film; it doesn't work properly.

Also, as they wear (being bronze; they are designed to) they lose their sharp edges and this also reduces their ability to engage. This is also a source of engagement noise.

The lighter the grade of oil; the better synchro engagement (less crunching) will be; go too light, and you lose the damping effect of the oil and the gearbox will be noisy. Shift action will improve.

Go far too light and the oil can't protect the metal components in the gearbox, as the oil film gets forced from between the metal surfaces, polymer chains get broken down, excessive heat gets generated and components wear prematurely.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time Tom, but bad information is just as useless as no information at all.

No worries mate, glazing is probably the wrong word but i'd heard tales of redline helping synchros and others saying the opposite

pretty much all of that previous information was regurgitated from the toymods thread

with the exception of the excerpt from redline about not using in in synchro boxes

a lot of the toymods guys were rating castrol vmx80 as being much better than previous oils

Read and taken under advisement. That's one negative experience against quite a number of positive ones. I think my point is still valid tho. If the synchros are screwed and it requires a rebuild, what's the harm with throwing some Redline in? I'll do some research and see what I come up with.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...