Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mmmmmm.....nismo carbon rear view cover.

I just love new parts especially oem parts........all this build just does is motivates me to spend more money on my build lol

  • Like 1

The Nismo reear vision cover looks amazing when on. Though i would paint the existing full rear vision mount black as the grey stands out heaps when you put the cover on. Sorry for the image quality, this is mine on:

post-92069-0-24175500-1392953037.jpg

The Nismo reear vision cover looks amazing when on. Though i would paint the existing full rear vision mount black as the grey stands out heaps when you put the cover on. Sorry for the image quality, this is mine on:

post-92069-0-24175500-1392953037.jpg

also anf, I would not paint but just put some 3M carbon scothcprint on that area

also anf, I would not paint but just put some 3M carbon scothcprint on that area

Holy crap even better idea. I have some left over from doing my door cards. I know what im doing this weekend!

My thread is coming slowly. Gotta get around to making one. The box has clear on it now. Around 4 coats just to reduce stone chipping.

Gonna grab one of those nismo covers to next order. :)

hey Robbie - what is the last picture of in your last post ?

All the rest I have but bugger me if I can work that last one out mate

Im going to take a guess and think its a number plate bracket right?

Im going to take a guess and think its a number plate bracket right?

Its the fire extinguisher bracket mentioned earlier that mounts at the front of the drivers seat.

Glad we all agree Nismo cover is the business :thumbsup:

So got the adaptors finished off

DSC01920.JPG

And this guy in

DSC01930.JPG

DSC01931.JPG

Hadn't peeled the clear of this yet in photo

DSC_0881.JPG

Wasn't happy with the way this guy was sticking, got some 3M transfer tape (very thin)

DSC_0871.JPG

DSC_0872.JPG

Then this happened Sunday arvo :(

DSC_0890.JPG

DSC_0893.JPG

No damage except a tiny nick out of the fan shroud. Yet to find out what the cause was, but have since heard the Ross balancers are a common cause...yet to look into it further

That sucks!

Is it the Ross Metal Jacket Race, or the regular Metal Jacket?

I know that there is a new revision that only comes with under driven pulleys to avoid this problem. Maybe you have the old revision?

Edited by Jazzadub

That sucks!

Is it the Ross Metal Jacket Race, or the regular Metal Jacket?

I know that there is a new revision that only comes with under driven pulleys to avoid this problem. Maybe you have the old revision?

Fkn oath!

Running the one below. Just metal jacket. Looks like you're spot on Jeremy...

IMG_5604.JPG

There is another one now listed below on the website, looks like I will have to get onto Ross and see what he can offer

NISSAN 306212 METAL JACKET HARMONIC BALANCER - RB26-R32 20%U/DRIVE P/STEER

Edited by $$slowmedown

Yea that's unfortunate.

You can also get a pulley kit like below which could solve the problem - this is a picture from Ross website.

But yes, I would talk to Ross to see what they recommend.

Nissan-RB26-Kit-1.jpg

Edited by Jazzadub

There is also another MJ revision 306202X2 which I'd say is version 2 of yours, which could save you having to go to an underdriven pulley?

Does the P/S pulley look different on this one compared to yours? Could be a better option than an ugly extra pulley?

mj306202.jpg

Edited by Jazzadub

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...