Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just watched Pinkham interview Rosberg, he hadn't heard what Hamilton said on the podium but said it's nice to hear it, and that he completely understands the teams point of view and knows it'd be exactly the same order if it was him in Hamilton's position. He said of course he would've loved to go flat out to the end but that he knows there'll be a time for that. Level headed team player.

Marko told SkySports that he agrees Seb needs to be spoken to as he disobeyed team orders. Horner said pretty much the same thing

I'm sure he won't be punished but at least they aren't hanging Webber out to dry by telling the media that the drivers are free to race to the flag

Marko told SkySports that he agrees Seb needs to be spoken to as he disobeyed team orders. Horner said pretty much the same thing

I'm sure he won't be punished but at least they aren't hanging Webber out to dry by telling the media that the drivers are free to race to the flag

so what they're saying is that they've favoured him too much and vettel thinking he is better than sliced bread has come back to bite them a little bit

and i think webber would've actually won if he hadn't backed off because he was told to. i wouldn't be surprised if that happened before the last stop, given that vettel was able to close a few second gap in 1 lap on new tyres.

and had they pitted webber before vettel at the last stop i think he would never have gotten close to him

...and in another interview he just gave Seb has just back tracked and claimed he didnt know he wasnt allowed to pass...he didnt know of the agreement and would not have passed if he knew. As soon as he said it he tried to back step a little knowing he had just lied in tv...dumb fark

to me, 2 exact same situations one with the team outcome one with the selfish outcome.

Hamilton told to slow down to conserve petrol, rosberg told not to over take and did the team thing

Webber told "21" and conserve your car, Vettel ignores the request and acts selfeshly.

Two different teams, two very different outcomes.

Selfish, selfish man.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • After using a protractor for an actually accurate assessment of what is required,  and by NOT using my uncalibrated eyeball I worked out I need a 25° silicone bend from the TB ro the MAF, but, my choice was either a 30° or a 23° (23° is a weird spec), so I grabbed the 23° one from Raceworks I also grabbed 1mtr of 3" straight from Just Jap, I needed 350mm, but they only had 300mm, or 1mtr lengths....meh Also ordered a 1/2" hose bulkhead fitting from fleabay, this has a smoothish mushroom looking head (they are designed for below the water line of boats) that will fit inside the bend, the hose bit and threaded bit looks to long, but nothing that a hacksaw cannot fix if required, the hose will then just get jamed on the threaded bit up to the retaining nut Fingers crossed and the unsightly amount of hose clamps will be reduced down to 4 once all the parts arrive 
    • Oil change does not trigger code 21. Code 21 is for coilpacks primary side connection. You can try to clear the code with a battery disconnect, hold down the brake pedal to drain capacitors through the brake lights with the ignition on for 10-15 seconds before you reconnect the battery. I have seen R35 coil conversion permanently cause this code with no ill effects so it might be the resistance it wants to see isn't quite right on one or more coilpacks. Could be inside the ECU, could be the harness, could be a coil. You can test it all if you want or just ignore until the car actually starts misfiring.
    • I forgot you have a Nistune ECU. Use Nistune to do all the tests I mentioned instead of faffing with 30+ year old electrical connectors. You can read MAF volts off that too, there are reference values in the service manual to tell you roughly what it should be in different conditions.
    • No. I think it might be the AFM. Hence the use of the terms "swaptronics", which implies the use of swapping out electronics for the purpose of diagnosis. It's about the only way to prove that a small/niggling/whatever problem with an AFM or a CAS or similar is actually caused by that AFM/CAS/whatever. A known good item swapped in that still gives the same problem is likely to be caused somewhere else. They're all the same. Spraying AFMs with cleaner is an each way bet between cleaning it and f**king it.
    • Oh wow! This might actually work amazingly. Do you know the ratio of the diff? I was told the only thing you need to make sure of is if the front & rear diff ratios are the same. Ours is a 4.083 Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...