Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just watched Pinkham interview Rosberg, he hadn't heard what Hamilton said on the podium but said it's nice to hear it, and that he completely understands the teams point of view and knows it'd be exactly the same order if it was him in Hamilton's position. He said of course he would've loved to go flat out to the end but that he knows there'll be a time for that. Level headed team player.

Marko told SkySports that he agrees Seb needs to be spoken to as he disobeyed team orders. Horner said pretty much the same thing

I'm sure he won't be punished but at least they aren't hanging Webber out to dry by telling the media that the drivers are free to race to the flag

Marko told SkySports that he agrees Seb needs to be spoken to as he disobeyed team orders. Horner said pretty much the same thing

I'm sure he won't be punished but at least they aren't hanging Webber out to dry by telling the media that the drivers are free to race to the flag

so what they're saying is that they've favoured him too much and vettel thinking he is better than sliced bread has come back to bite them a little bit

and i think webber would've actually won if he hadn't backed off because he was told to. i wouldn't be surprised if that happened before the last stop, given that vettel was able to close a few second gap in 1 lap on new tyres.

and had they pitted webber before vettel at the last stop i think he would never have gotten close to him

...and in another interview he just gave Seb has just back tracked and claimed he didnt know he wasnt allowed to pass...he didnt know of the agreement and would not have passed if he knew. As soon as he said it he tried to back step a little knowing he had just lied in tv...dumb fark

to me, 2 exact same situations one with the team outcome one with the selfish outcome.

Hamilton told to slow down to conserve petrol, rosberg told not to over take and did the team thing

Webber told "21" and conserve your car, Vettel ignores the request and acts selfeshly.

Two different teams, two very different outcomes.

Selfish, selfish man.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...