Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree with Ash,

i really dont see how by just adding E85, you can take a great -7 result like 325awkw ^^ on pump and make it go 370 plus on other cars

at the end of the day, if you have the MPH we really cant argue

I never thought I'd get anywhere near 370 with -7s but I was wondering if 350 was too much to ask for.

I'm not too sure what GT-R's are like with power to mph as I've just come from an XR6 Turbo that ran 118 mph with 297rwkw. If I could get around that sort of mph I'd be pretty happy.

I never thought I'd get anywhere near 370 with -7s but I was wondering if 350 was too much to ask for.

I'm not too sure what GT-R's are like with power to mph as I've just come from an XR6 Turbo that ran 118 mph with 297rwkw. If I could get around that sort of mph I'd be pretty happy.

350 would be the norm result and somewhere around 120-123mph should be a good goal. Cams will stretch you out further. im a strict 98 no cams believer but add E85 into the equation and MILD cams are a viable addition.

Well that was what I was hoping to here. 350 and 120mph would be about my goal. Not willing to change cams. I've spent enough money for the moment.

Also what times would i be looking at with 120mph? High 11s?

Well that was what I was hoping to here. 350 and 120mph would be about my goal. Not willing to change cams. I've spent enough money for the moment.

Also what times would i be looking at with 120mph? High 11s?

350rwkw in a R32 GTR would see you closer to 124/125mph, this would be low 11s easily.

In my 33 GTR which is heavier, i ran 123mph with 340rwkw and 11.3

I'd be over the moon to run that time and mph but i'm a bit more realistic and would be happy with a high 11.

Any idea whether a 3" exhaust would be holding me back at this stage and whether upgrading to a 3.5" would be of much benefit?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...