Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok.. So there was a post a while ago about some poor bloke in Vic who got fined by the cops and decided to take his case to court. The debate then started in that thread about whether or not a police officer's word is suffice to warrant a speeding fine without any hard proof eg. radar read-out. A few people claimed that it did. I thought it didn't and now guess what? I've been hit with a $600 fine, 6 demerit points, and a 6 month suspension because some cop "estimates" that I was going 40 kmh over the limit. No proof, no readings, no nothing. When he pulled me over he immediately tried to force a confession of excessive speed out of me, though I only admitted to what I actually did. Yes I was speeding but only by 10-15 over. He told me he didnt have a reading but estimated my speed based off his 20 yrs experience as a cop. Anyway this asshole started interrogating me asking me if id been in trouble with cops before, breath/drug tests etc., while clearly trying to pressure me into saying what he wanted to hear. So naturally I refuse to be punished for something I didnt do, so im taking the matter to court. The cops word against mine. Ill keep you all posted and we'll see where this all ends...

Edited by Iron Mike
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Same with me but not for speeding, im taking my fines to court, he pined me on driving turbo and no p plates displayed (in a convertible btw) the copper never saw the engine bay and never saw me in the drivers seat or driving the car on the road, problem is how am i gonna prove it. its pretty much my word vs the coppers,and the copper put another date on one of the fines too so it didn't look like i coped it all in one day wtf thats bs

I dont care about paying the fines its the points that hit me, as that would cost me to lose my licance.

The car was parked on the side of the road and i was working under the bonnet, he said ill get 2 fines in the mail, few days later the fines came and there was 4 in there wtf -.- 6 points worth and $1000+ in fines, so goin to court for it but idk when it is

Edited by Johnie

i have read in the past experienced/long serving police officers have won court cases where they had judged the speed without radar/laser or pacing behind you, it was deemed that a police officer would have the experience to accurately judge your speed by sight.

You shouldn't have admitted that you were speeding until you were shown your speed, the fact that you were driving a "sports car" that looks/sounds fast doesn't help plus all the stigma attached to performance cars is working against you, you can only weigh up your choices if you have a clean driving record and believe you were only speeding by 10/20km/hr over go speak with a good lawyer and see what they have to say, i own up to my mistakes but if I'm wrongly accursed i fight my point across. good luck dude!

So Cops are trained to be official estimators of speed.

you will need hard proof that you were not doing what they said.

we have a well respected officer on here who has confirmed this.

if your planning on taking it to court you def need more than just your word v his.

now that said, get a lawyer and use him to put in a plea that you were doing 10-15 not 40 and you might get it reduced. but you best have a good driving history for them to do that.

So Cops are trained to be official estimators of speed.

you will need hard proof that you were not doing what they said.

we have a well respected officer on here who has confirmed this.

if your planning on taking it to court you def need more than just your word v his.

now that said, get a lawyer and use him to put in a plea that you were doing 10-15 not 40 and you might get it reduced. but you best have a good driving history for them to do that.

This.

You're boned if it's your word vs his. He will win, 100%.

Argue that you were only 10-15 over and his estimate was off and you might stand a small chance of getting that past the keeper, but don't hold your breath. A good traffic lawyer will help, but will be pricey.

So I had an on-the-spot 1 month suspension 6 years ago for being 28 kmh over. Other than that a pretty clean record. Im guessing even though it was a while ago it will look pretty bad. Has anyone ever had a favourable outcome in a similar scenario? When I was 18 I took a fine to court, pleaded guilty in the face of exceptional circumstances and got out of it...

Edited by Iron Mike

I say get legal advice but best outcome would be to get speed dropped to less than 35 over so to lose licence for 1 month instead of 6. Shouldnt be too hard to do that as estimation only etc.

I highly doubt you can get it dropped to under 25 over and keep licence but worth trying.

I understand frustration with cops word against mine but imagine if it was the other way. Then every single fine would be contested if you simply said no I didn't do it and court said ok, dismissed. Might as well have no road laws at all.

A few people claimed that it did. I thought it didn't and now guess what? I've been hit with a $600 fine, 6 demerit points, and a 6 month suspension because some cop "estimates" that I was going 40 kmh over the limit. No proof, no readings, no nothing. W

It wasn't a claim... It was fact, as it's Law and has been for a loooong time, I guess now you realise that :)

Lawyer up. Admit to doing 18km/h over or something and you will probably get away with that reduction.

The fact you admitted to them you were speeding, you are basically stuffed. You should've said nothing.

Was he following you or was he stationary?

I got done once but the cop was following me so he used his speedo.

If the cop was stationary then thats grade a bulls**t, know one can realistically tell how fast someone is going just by looking, not enough to say you where speeding by that much anyways. As mentioned before a good defense might be to admit speeding but not as much as claimed.

Why do cops have the ability to assume guilt until you prove your innocence?

If the cop was stationary then thats grade a bulls**t, know one can realistically tell how fast someone is going just by looking

:rofl:

A grade bullshit?

To estimate speed you need 3 very basic things.

- Start Point

- End Point

- Time

It's really that simple. Will it ever be exact? No, but it'll be near enough and that is all the court cares about as it's not going to be wildly inaccurate.

Hey, i think that was my post but i lost all my account info for the other account.

I took him to court, the update on that was that i did (admit) to going 10km over the speed limit because there was no signs saying the limit so i assumed it was 60km when it was 50km.

I was abused by the officer who threw my license on the ground and when i told him to show me evidence he said if i think cops need evidence to place "scum" into a court room i should just rip up my license now.

When he was notified i was going to court he sent me 4-5 NEW infringements that he just made up, which were; 100km in a 50.

So i was facing 3-4 months in jail, loss of license for 4 years and $1200 fine. Also my car was going to be impounded and destroyed.

$7000 on legal fees later, i delayed the court to get off my P Plates so that i am not on them till im 30, i managed to get away with just 45 days loss license and $600 fine. I then had to go on good behavior so i could keep my license after that which lasts 12 months?

No evidence was ever presented in court on his behalf, he didn't even show up.

Cops can do whatever they want and the legal system will just let them get away with it. Luckily i had a good judge who my lawyer explained the situation and the judge said "i understand the situation however the law states i must act with good judgement on the police behalf that they are doing their job correctly and for the people".

I will PM you my number if you need any help or advice.

with your exhaust even 5km/h sounds fast lol

i hope you get off man.. because even a few km can be a difference of 3 months

Exactly :/

I thought if I admitted to speeding it might make things easier. Apparently not... in terms of court cases, it really depends on luck of the draw. When I went to court before I had a magistrate who acted like the fine I had was of no importance to her, and she was more than happy to let it side to keep her day moving...somehow I dont think ill be as lucky this time. Cop told me to sell my car (jealous bastard), think I might have to if I lose my license for that long :(

Edited by Iron Mike

Eastern freeway in Doncaster about 3 weeks ago. Worst part was it was a day before I flew out to japan where I was supposed to buy some parts for my car (while on holiday) - Dont know if I will now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...