Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

I've got a S2 RB25DET and i'm basically chasing 300rwkw. As for mods i'm not 100% sure on what i'll do, I'm after opinions on what would be a succesful way of reaching my target.

Rough idea:

Spitfire coilpacks

Tomei Poncams

Tomei adj cam gears

555cc injectors

Walbro fuel pump

Pod filter ( already done )

Fmic ( already done )

Front facing plenum

3inch turbo back exhuast with hi flow car ( already done )

Nismo fuel reg

Nismo oil pump

I'm unsure of turbo setups to run, I want something responsive with a decent power output i have a few in mind but please opinions, and also the same for ECU, this is the first turbo car i'll be modifying and its going to be a build and opinions would be nice. I know i'll need a good tuner aswell

As i said i'm chasing 300rwkw, twin plate clutches would support that?

Edited by skyline32sup
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417658-rb25-chasing-300rwkw-opinions/
Share on other sites

How much are you prepared to spend? You can go from reasonably responsive 300-ish kw all the way to ultra responsive 300+kw and spend a very different sum of money.

An outright optimal 300kw setup would feature 6boost twin scroll manifold with twin wastegates, EFR7670 turbo, G4 Link ECU with Link boost control, a set of ID1000s and a Walbro E85 friendly 400+lph fuel pump. Then you could go E85/flex fuel and make well over 300kw...

Hey,

I've got a S2 RB25DET and i'm basically chasing 300rwkw. As for mods i'm not 100% sure on what i'll do, I'm after opinions on what would be a succesful way of reaching my target.

Rough idea:

Spitfire coilpacks

Tomei Poncams

Tomei adj cam gears

555cc injectors

Walbro fuel pump

Pod filter ( already done )

Fmic ( already done )

Front facing plenum

3inch turbo back exhuast with hi flow car ( already done )

Nismo fuel reg

Nismo oil pump

I'm unsure of turbo setups to run, I want something responsive with a decent power output i have a few in mind but please opinions, and also the same for ECU, this is the first turbo car i'll be modifying and its going to be a build and opinions would be nice. I know i'll need a good tuner aswell

As i said i'm chasing 300rwkw, twin plate clutches would support that?

if your in brissy you can use eflex, so forget the 555's and go 1000's, you could basically copy my setup without the gtx, cams and external gate.

a 3076 with 0.63 on eflex for maximum response and hit the 300kw.

Edited by AngryRBGTX

If you MUST get 300rwkw on 98ron then a 3076 (56 trim) 0.82 is the minimum you will need. Even then you might not get there and depends on dyno as much as engine/tune. If you get a good exhaust manifold and use an external gate then you'd be more sure of making the magic number, but you'll still need the 0.82 and 1.3 bar.

A stock engine will last OK for street use, occasional track days and depends on how you use it/abuse it.

Also need 600+ cc injectors, perhaps the 740cc Nismo to allow E85 use in future?

I've got some side feed 880cc injectors and a 3076R .82 about to be hitting the for sale thread.

They are off my RB25 which was making 306kw at 16psi. Std plenum, std cams, 3inch exhaust.

Pm me if interested.

Pretty good power at 16psi, who tuned it?

I've got the 3076 on mine, with 555cc making 275rwkw, hoping 1000cc and a hiflow cat can get me 300 without e85

555's are enough for 300kw, probably not the issue, mine was limited to 280kw, tuner said some rb's can take more timing and others cant so dont expect things to change just like that, but obviously the exhaust must flow well..

Pretty good power at 16psi, who tuned it?

It was Unigroup or Jem, pretty sure Unigroup. I saw the dyno sheet when I bought the car off the previous owner.

Will be hitting the dyno again sometime next month once.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...