Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been meaning to share my experience. It's been a positive one regarding the purchase of performance coilpacks off ebay.

I'm not arguing the validity of claims made in OP nor quick to jump to conclusions around speding the big $ for quality. Everyone knows you get what you pay for.

This view may help those thinking of buying second hand.

Given my budget I was rather disenchanted with paying big dollars for second-hand brandname coils - generally some only seemed to be a 20% discount to what you would buy new.

To put things in perspective: 1. They're second hand. 2. Private sellers do not necessarily have a reputation to uphold or trade as a business. 3. Km's and/or their performance for the parts are generally unverified 4. No warranty 5. Recourse for disputes generally don't exist.

20% discount doesn't seem very attractive after-taking the above into consideration, a risk I would avoid all together and simply buy new if I could have afforded it.

The ones I use claim to have a 2-year warranty. Local Aussie seller. Recourse in Aus. - replacement. Ebay Powerseller 99.8% feedback.

I currently make 260rkw with them. $265 NEW and am currently very happy.

Happy to answer any questions. Not interested in people knocking me for using them. I'm simply spelling out better alternatives to secondhand. -knock the ones selling second hand ones at a 20-25% discount to new.

i run a tune shop and have to break the news to customers that their skyline needs decent coil packs .. im sure just about every other tune shop has the same experience with coilpacks and skylines... paying $265 and then having to cough up for something decent is no bargain.

I forked out the money for splitfires about 2 years ago when i dropped the 25 into my coupe, even though they are pretty much bran new i dought id be replacing them anytime soon.

Do it once and do it right. Poor man pays twice if you cheap out. Not bagging other cheaper brands and im sure there is storys been as good as the top of the market brands but i only go for the best of the best.

That's my 2C.

I agree with what everyone is saying - pay the $ do it once do it right etc.

But it comes to a point where over-engineering for headroom for each single performance part that you won't actually end-up using may see you spend $$ unecessarily. e.g. instead put those dollars towards a bigger or highflow turbo where it will make the biggest difference.

We'll see if my coils will hold up at 300rwkw but by that stage, I have reservations about the stock motor anyway.

An interesting point I would like to make: Maybe it's not a function of power but how much PSI they can handle?? i.e. OP mentioned this particular set were breakdown / blowing-out at around 17psi?

Mine are fine but I'm only running 15psi max.

Might be useful for people to know. e.g. similar to the way we've come to a consensus around the stock rb25det turbo not doing more than 12psi.

I can vouch for the stock turbo not doing well at high boost,hubby and son playing around with a home made boost controller.

17psi,lasted about an hour before it popped.This happened in 05 got gcg to hi flow and fix it been perfect ever since. :D

No its actually the opposite the coils will work fine until they are required to work under high load.. then the missfire. Car ran fine at 12psi but could not light the fires above 16psi

That is kind of what I meant actually. IE you could audibly hear that they are not up to the job?

So with the graph in the OP, the "low power" condition with the cheap coils weren't clean power runs, those cheap coils actually had misfire? What I'm getting at is whether or not it's possible for coilpacks to sound totally normal even at full noise (no misfire sounds) and just produce less power?

No its actually the opposite the coils will work fine until they are required to work under high load.. then the missfire. Car ran fine at 12psi but could not light the fires above 16psi

Yes, that's what happens.

I've got an old Repco spark plug cleaner/testing machine. Modern workshops wouldn't waste their time with such gear but it's useful to actually see what happens when you increase cylinder pressure.

Brand new plugs will perform perfectly at around 80psi but increase the pressure to 120 and they'll be breaking down. Go to 150 and you'd be surprised how poor the spark is. Close the plug gap and away you go again.

Before take off aero engines drop each mag and run load conditions observing the rpm drop per mag.

Poor spark equates to predictable loss of hp when under load.

Showing my age but as DC3 passengers, we'd be listening for a weak cylinder as the pilot's ran up and tested each engine's mags at the end of the runway.

That is kind of what I meant actually. IE you could audibly hear that they are not up to the job?

So with the graph in the OP, the "low power" condition with the cheap coils weren't clean power runs, those cheap coils actually had misfire? What I'm getting at is whether or not it's possible for coilpacks to sound totally normal even at full noise (no misfire sounds) and just produce less power?

Yes it is possible for a weak coil not to misfire but produce less power.

Usually the discharge time increases on faulty coils. Normal inductive coil discharge time can be anywhere from 10-50us, I've personally seen twice the dicharge time in comparing a good coil vs bad, can't remember the discharge time but it was a ba coil. If you look at an engine at 6000rpm with a coil discharge time of 50us and a bad coil at 100us that means if you are knock limited on the good coil cylinder than you will be 0.05/10x 360 = 1.8degrees retarded on that cylinder.

Powerloss attributable to misfire aside, how much less are we talking e.g 1 cylinder @1.8 degree retarded as per the example above?

Could it reach as high as say 20rwkw loss with everything appearing to be 'normal'?

Edited by tranman

Powerloss attributable to misfire aside, how much less are we talking e.g 1 cylinder @1.8 degree retarded as per the example above?

Could it reach as high as say 20rwkw loss with everything appearing to be 'normal'?

Well it depends, if you have 1 good coil with 5 bad you could have real problems. Also where your peak power occurs will affect power loss. The higher the rev range the more retarded the ignition event becomes which means the greater the power loss becomes. Using the same figures as before at 7500rpm the ignition retard will be about 2.25deg.

Dropping 2degrees on a knock limited rb25 could reduce power by 10-20rwkw quiet easily.

You can test the coils response by scoping the coil high voltage side, kind of need to know what your looking at though.

Yes it is possible for a weak coil not to misfire but produce less power.

Usually the discharge time increases on faulty coils. Normal inductive coil discharge time can be anywhere from 10-50us, I've personally seen twice the dicharge time in comparing a good coil vs bad, can't remember the discharge time but it was a ba coil. If you look at an engine at 6000rpm with a coil discharge time of 50us and a bad coil at 100us that means if you are knock limited on the good coil cylinder than you will be 0.05/10x 360 = 1.8degrees retarded on that cylinder.

I meant to say "1.8degrees retarded on the other cylinders".

If the engine is not knock limited than generally you can get around the dodgy coils by advancing the timing past MBT to account for the slower coil discharge rate/coil voltage rise time.

I've been using yellow jackets for a about a year and havent had a probelm with them. When doing the research I actually came accross of lot of guys who said they have had spitfires fail on them, or had problems etc, but nothing negative about the yellowjackets, so I deceid to go with them even though I could afford the spitfires.

If you actually look at a yellow jacket carefully you can see the coils and contacts are very high quality and they are not messing about like the cheap chinese red ones, which i have also seen and used and they are horrible.

Thats said there was nothing wrong with my stock ones. They wroked flawlessly. I just felt they were old. I sold all 6 for a measly $90 kind of regret it now.

Edited by sonicz
  • 2 weeks later...

I agree with what everyone is saying - pay the $ do it once do it right etc.

But it comes to a point where over-engineering for headroom for each single performance part that you won't actually end-up using may see you spend $$ unecessarily. e.g. instead put those dollars towards a bigger or highflow turbo where it will make the biggest difference.

We'll see if my coils will hold up at 300rwkw but by that stage, I have reservations about the stock motor anyway.

An interesting point I would like to make: Maybe it's not a function of power but how much PSI they can handle?? i.e. OP mentioned this particular set were breakdown / blowing-out at around 17psi?

Mine are fine but I'm only running 15psi max.

Might be useful for people to know. e.g. similar to the way we've come to a consensus around the stock rb25det turbo not doing more than 12psi.

Just wanted to let people know- going for 300kw + on e85. Tuner has come back telling me coilpack #5 is arcing out all over the place. Told him to drop in Splitfires STAT.

We were still both impressed they managed 260kw though.

So when the mod bug bites, you'll eventually need them.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...