Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

this is my rb26/30 build

by kanaris engine in melb

rb30 block - cryogenic block and girdle

cp pistons

9310 pins

upgraded loxx by cp

carrillos rods

AT1 balancer

L19 Head studs

Jun 12 main studs

9L sump ASR

Billet motorsports external oil pump kit

annual groove main tunnel

Head getting done now

2mm inlet/2mm ex valves

supertech valve springs seats retainers

ferrea valve locks

tomie 260/270 cams 10.25 lift

tomei lifters

tomie cam gears

looking at 1000hp at the engine

going in vl

post-87775-0-67934300-1366281902_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-07005600-1366281915_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-07661800-1366281926_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-42773000-1366281938_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-10906700-1366281950_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-54303800-1366281964_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-53420400-1366281976_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-68541000-1366281985_thumb.jpg

post-87775-0-61220500-1366281996_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423779-rb-2630-build/
Share on other sites

I always thought running flat tops means u can run more lift.

comp ratio going to be around 7.8 to 8.1

reason that low comp - less pinging high boost ,

makes more power then high comp - all types of fuel

I notice a lot of high comp boost rb have head/studs lifting issues

allways prefer low comp high boost/ high comp low boost

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423779-rb-2630-build/#findComment-6823429
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I here'd about weathering/seasoned blocks are better for hp than new block for cast iron - new block will move and flex up until 100,000km

Idea is the hot and cold temp stop the cast iron from expanding/ flexing - taxi blocks would be good idea

I left the rb30 block outs side for 6 months bare wit the girdle and just befor sent to engine shop I went to cryogenics

I believe this theory works , some might disagree

crank wouldn't think be any benefits

only cost $200 shop in melb -http://www.cryocycle.com.au/

Gerry

Edited by chairman
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423779-rb-2630-build/#findComment-6922218
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...