Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you roll back through this thread you will find a thread about some guy 'back-to-back'ing a range of turbos on some kind of Audi.. Posted by Lith.

From memory the test list is as follows:

- GT3076

- 3076HTA

- GT3582

- 3582HTA

- Some PT thing

So putting my understanding of those results together with results I have seen elsewhere; the 3582HTA packs the usual 35R punch for outright power but brings response back towards the realms of a garden variety 3076R.

Elsewhere I have noted that a 3586 seems to keep things on the '35R' playing field in terms of response but packs a heavier punch with more outright power.

So in your case you could make the following generalisations:

- 3582HTA = better spool than stock FG turbo, as much power (if not a little extra due to larger comp housing) as BA/F stock turbo

- 3586HTA = BA/F stock like spool with more outright power

(for the uninitiated following this topic the FG turbo is a 3576R and BA/F is a 3582R, both with .50ar comp housing)

I hope that helps.

  • Like 1

Beat me to it, GTScotT :-D Comparing response between the HTA3582 and a HTA3586 is not like comparing with a normal 3582

Cheers for sharing that juggernaut, good info. Any thoughts?

If you roll back through this thread you will find a thread about some guy 'back-to-back'ing a range of turbos on some kind of Audi.. Posted by Lith.

From memory the test list is as follows:

- GT3076

- 3076HTA

- GT3582

- 3582HTA

- Some PT thing

So putting my understanding of those results together with results I have seen elsewhere; the 3582HTA packs the usual 35R punch for outright power but brings response back towards the realms of a garden variety 3076R.

Elsewhere I have noted that a 3586 seems to keep things on the '35R' playing field in terms of response but packs a heavier punch with more outright power.

So in your case you could make the following generalisations:

- 3582HTA = better spool than stock FG turbo, as much power (if not a little extra due to larger comp housing) as BA/F stock turbo

- 3586HTA = BA/F stock like spool with more outright power

(for the uninitiated following this topic the FG turbo is a 3576R and BA/F is a 3582R, both with .50ar comp housing)

I hope that helps.

Is the order in your list is a bit arse about - you've got the HTA3582 after the GT3582?

Beat me to it, GTScotT :-D Comparing response between the HTA3582 and a HTA3586 is not like comparing with a normal 3582

Cheers for sharing that juggernaut, good info. Any thoughts?

Yeah I wasn't comparing the HTA's to the GT3582 I was comparing like for like. If the HTA3586 was say 200rpm laggier than the HTA 3582 I might have considered it. But 500rpm is a bit more than I was expecting. The HTA3586 is GTX3582 territory both flowing 75lbs from memory - but i do realise from this thread that the HTA would be the better thing.

I keep coming back the the HTA3582 as the weapon of choice as I prefer response over outright horsepower (my other car is an S15 with twin scroll 3076 52 trim)

Will pick a Barra tuner here in Perth.......thinking either Monsta Torque or Extreme Ford Tuning and get their opinions.

Oh yeah, I expect that the HTA3582 would have a pretty big flow advantage over the stock FG turbo... Or even an edge over the normal 3582

The stock FG turbo is no slouch in the real world with bolts on's - approx 11 seconds neat with ZF - according to the Nizpro website - which ain't bad for a heavy family car.

The HTA3582 can only be better though!!

Is the order in your list is a bit arse about - you've got the HTA3582 after the GT3582?

The list was in no particular order, the comments are where the data is.

Josh

Id be definately goin the 3586hta on a falcon 4litre, with motor that size i dont think ud notice the spool much. U gota remember when FP say 500 rpm difference most of their turbos go on 2litre evos, id guess ud be very gard to notice when actually driving the car on a 4litre.

Also the hta3586 is more responsive than a gtx, there is a guy who had a similar setup to mine, we both had gt35r and i switched to hta3586 and gained 200rpm im spool, he switched to gtx35 and lost around 300rpm spool. Both were without any other changes.

Haha, if u can get the thing off the manifold u can, id say its near impossible with out an oxy torch. Lol.

I nearly went the gt35/to4z hiflow before i decided on the hta, aparantly a fair bit of extra lag

Is what put me off, is that the case with steves?

Btw, how does steve get away with running in the 10s without andra approved car? Or has he had it passed? They were straight onto me last meet

apparently..f**k me, a 3540 is faster with a manual...as it makes way better"average" power, comp wheels to big!

auto with converter, yep would be faster..think the 67 wheel only make another 30 rwkw more ...way up top

Don't think Steve does get away with it..last meet he did one 10.5 and then put it straight on trailer, before they asked him

He at least has a 1/2 cage with front door bars..so they are going to be more lenient maybe, you have nothing though

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Yea r32 gts4. Unfortunately at adelaide you cant run under 11sec without a cage so only get one shot at it.

I did do a 1.67 60' on my first run but got off it at half track coz i thought it wasnt a very good launch. Have done 1.58 at another track before but was only 1/8 mile.

Just so you know..the adelaide four/rotary turbo nats in 11 weeks, has got special insurance

Just like heathcote you can go as fast as you want with no cage, meaning for this one meet you could go as hard as you can

be your chance to do your best!, it won't happen again

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Finally found a result for an HTA3794 on an engine a bit closer to the RB world in displacement and behaviour - someone did a "budget" high power build with an Audi A6 using one on pump gas, following mods:

Stock 2.7 with more than 100k miles only upgraded with IE rods (stock piston)
Running stock 2.8 heads (no 2.7 hardware) they were OEM factory rebuilt units.
Rs4 intake with 75mm BBk throttle body
Custom Single turbo HTA3794
034 IIc standalone Tuned by Dynodoc
Aem water Meth
Eurokracy_-_Autodrome_St-Eustache_le_26_
DynoDoc_mikeGT3794_wtq_whp.JPG
Spool actually looks not really any worse than a T04Z from what I can tell, and these turbos are known to be able to make much more power than this on E85 - can clearly tell that it's not struggling with flow looking at the dyno plot, too. A built RB30, E85 and hearty boost and I reckon one of these things would be almost scary :)

Stands up like i was hoping it would, now to find someone to be a a guinea pig..lol

If you know anyone who might be that way inclined, let them know about this:

Super94 HTA: http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER94&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

Super99 HTA: http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER99&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

The T3 Super94 and Super99 HTA turbos are currently at US$1725 which is getting near standard Garrett GT turbo price, they are doing a clearance (and also looking like they are digging the boot into Precision as they said let on EvoM to them know if you are looking at getting a PT BB and they'll price accordingly...) as the new generation HTZ turbos will be coming soon.

Thats a good deal.

Darren, u should twist steves arm to get one, probly still more responsive than his hiflow thing and tell him he will bewt corran and run in the 9s.

i bet the .82 3794 would be closeish enough response wise to the 1.06 67/3540..and a massive increase up top...

I am trying,

but even a 3586 put in his 1.06 internal gate housing would work ...

ive been twisting for months..lol, its hard work

but because he can't.... or doesn't want to work on cars like us, hes up for all the labour aswell, so its a expensive exercise for him, for us it would be fark all

its a pity, as with a rebearing and rering, one of those turbos and use the nitrous he has on it..it would kick ass..

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...