Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question for those in the know.

Would there by any detriment to the performance of these turbos (specifically HTA 3076) if you ran a different rear housing such as a Kinugawa? The Tial rear housings are about $600. Is there a difference in performance between these and the cheaper alternatives? What are the differences?

  • 11 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
On 7/17/2016 at 2:32 PM, LaurelPWR said:

Thread dredge.... 

Do fp still make the hta3076 or an equivalent/newer version with a different name?

FP "grew" a new brand and turbo line called "Xona Rotor" which I can't attest to the reliability or performance of due to not knowing anyone running them BUT they are based on the normal FP HTA/HTZ compressors etc so no doubt good performance potential there.  The HTA3076 equivalent would be the XR61-56, which basically has a HTZ3076 compressor wheel: http://www.xonarotor.com/products/xrturbochargers/164-xr6156

Looks like FP themselves have phased out the Garrett based GT3076R in favour of pushing the Xona line HOWEVER Owen Developments are partners with FP and use a lot of their tech, and sell a lot of the older combos as well as some interesting combinations of their own but no doubt with twists and a bit more cost.  Here's their HTA3076: http://www.owendevelopments.co.uk/product/404/Owen_Developments_ODGT3076HTA/

 

 

FP "grew" a new brand and turbo line called "Xona Rotor" which I can't attest to the reliability or performance of due to not knowing anyone running them BUT they are based on the normal FP HTA/HTZ compressors etc so no doubt good performance potential there.  The HTA3076 equivalent would be the XR61-56, which basically has a HTZ3076 compressor wheel: http://www.xonarotor.com/products/xrturbochargers/164-xr6156

Looks like FP themselves have phased out the Garrett based GT3076R in favour of pushing the Xona line HOWEVER Owen Developments are partners with FP and use a lot of their tech, and sell a lot of the older combos as well as some interesting combinations of their own but no doubt with twists and a bit more cost.  Here's their HTA3076: http://www.owendevelopments.co.uk/product/404/Owen_Developments_ODGT3076HTA/

 

 



Thanks for the reply man (:
Yeah I looked into the Xona series since my previous post and they look like a good thing on paper! and by doing away with and plastics in the chra using all metal/steel bearing casings etc. I would assume it would have superior reliability over the older hta variants
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...
On 2 September 2016 at 6:39 PM, shnaped_second said:

Old thread but here is a super 94 on my 2630 build, only run in tune thats why its at 8psi. Not as laggy as i first thought 

20160831_173822.jpg

Did you wind it up man? Got a dyno for the full balls run?

Did you wind it up man? Got a dyno for the full balls run?




Hi Guys,
Due to the recent discussions in other threads in relation to the latest HTA results, Lithium and I decided it was time to create a new discussion thread as i do believe these will be a big part amongst the SAU community based on the results possible on the RB engine.
Forced Performance are normally associated with EVOs and STi's which results in them often being overlooked as an option for the general turbocharged world but they actually do a bunch of Garrett based upgrades for a variety of applications (not all are listed here):
http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=FP&Category_Code=Turbo-FPAndhttp://www.ringer-racing.com/category.sc?categoryId=180 A lot of these turbos have been around for years, and proven time and again to perform - it is a bit of a shame they aren't more known about in our area in the world. The HTA range came out in the late 2000s (before the Garrett GTX range) and as a general rule provided compressor wheels which made the equivalent GT units completely redundant, typically having physically smaller inducer dimensions (smaller trims tend to mean better response, and safer margain before surge) and the ability through design to flow over 10% better than the GT equivalent, without carrying the extra 25-30% mass the cast GT wheels have... so also great improvements to transient response. Over the years they've been used on a variety of serious cars in single and twin form, and often FP/HTA technology don't get the credit for it as they will be referred to in articles or the workshops who have supplied kits using them as "custom Garrett" units - key examples for these are Porsche and R35 GTRs, where FP turbos are one of (if not THE) turbo to use on those cars. They also supply an upgrade service which I am sure means they can built a custom version not listed on their site - which would mean there are the options of a HTA3071R, HTA3073R, HTA3076R, HTA3582R, HTA3586R, HTA3786R, HTA3794R, all the way up to the HTA4505 - so if anything there are actually more sensibly spaced options than currently available from Garrett themselves, and without the design compromises Garrett had to do in order to make them suit the OEM market - such as forfeiting compressor efficiency to be quiet, packaging reasons, and optimising low pressure ratios. This isn't to say the HTA turbos aren't only good at high pressure ratios, they are just more focussed on performance from 1.5-4 bar instead of .8-3 bar - generally speaking. End effect is they suit most of our purposes very well [emoji4] Boost Logic R35 GTR - 8.9 @ 180mph on its first outing, still on low profile radial tyres (AMS downsized brakes and rims): http://www.gtrlife.com/forums/topic/85461-boost-logic-89s-180mph/And vid: [/url] AWD Motorsport radial tyred/stock ECU EVO - 9.0 @ 160mph (it hit high 8s but the video is cr@p): Eddie Bello's Texas Invitational winning Porsche from 2013 - And plenty of time attack, circuit and rally cars have used them to great effect as well. After researching this turbo in great detail it was decided the HTA3076 would best suit my car as the GT3037-56T compressor was maxed out. Initially i was skeptical about the turbo as it is hard to get your mind around a setup with similar dimensions being capabale of so much more, after numerous discussions the decision was made to test one out and the results were nothing short of amazing! The turbo not on provided more peak power and torque, but the response was dramatically different, on paper it looks impressive but once in the drivers seat, its a totally different beast! I will have all the results on both fuels (E70 and pump 98) and also varying boost levels to post shortly but for now i have a direct back to back full power comparison from a GT3076 vs a HTA3076 - 217352_275271485949967_794567082_n_zps794e4f32.jpg And the video provided by JEM of the dyno runs - The HTA is certainly an impressive turbo and i think with the options of a HTA3073 & HTA3076 for RB25 they have nailed it! The old GT compressor had no answer for the newer HTA design. I must say a big thanks to LITHIUM as without his help and data i would not have made the choice to choose the HTA turbo, and again another big thanks to Just Engine Management for the awesome tune! Adam Neish knows how to get the best out of any given setup :yes: Discuss [emoji6]






RB25/30 Neo. E85 or Pump.

Yeah sweet dude I would be looking at a 3586 or even an 3794 with a 3l bottom end and the awesome flowing Neo head you'll still have excellent spoil response and if you go the HTA37 you'll hit your 500wkw goal easily asn have headroom for more

 

8 hours ago, B-rice said:

I'm torn between HTA3582 BorgWarner 8374 and PT6262. 25/30 built looking for 450-500kws. Has anyone got a compressor map for the HTA3582?

There are no compressor maps for the FP or Precision turbos.  I've lost a fair bit of love for FP over time, I know a few people who have been a bit burned by their "out of the USA" customer service - though their compressor wheels are pretty sweet.   

In saying that, the Garrett GTX3582R is a really good thing... even while I had more love for FP I'd have to say that the HTA3586 has no answer to the GTX3582R which matches or betters it in both flow and response.  The GTX3582R is a really good thing, and the Gen2 GTX3582R is even better again if more flow for a bit less response.  I'd not bother with the PT6262, personally but the EFR8374 is still from my experience so far a league above all of the above.

All comes down to what you want so spend, what manifolding etc you will be doing.  If you want single scroll then I'd be going the GTX3582R.  I've you're going to spend the extra to get the best then I'd go EFR.
 

There are no compressor maps for the FP or Precision turbos.  I've lost a fair bit of love for FP over time, I know a few people who have been a bit burned by their "out of the USA" customer service - though their compressor wheels are pretty sweet.   

In saying that, the Garrett GTX3582R is a really good thing... even while I had more love for FP I'd have to say that the HTA3586 has no answer to the GTX3582R which matches or betters it in both flow and response.  The GTX3582R is a really good thing, and the Gen2 GTX3582R is even better again if more flow for a bit less response.  I'd not bother with the PT6262, personally but the EFR8374 is still from my experience so far a league above all of the above.

All comes down to what you want so spend, what manifolding etc you will be doing.  If you want single scroll then I'd be going the GTX3582R.  I've you're going to spend the extra to get the best then I'd go EFR.

 

 

 

I went and bought a hta3076 at the end of last year almost purely based on yours and Wootens info and success with it ......hahah...... [emoji57]

Is your lost love only because of their shitty customer service or has there been faulty products or something else?

also, you have pm.

52 minutes ago, LaurelPWR said:

I went and bought a hta3076 at the end of last year almost purely based on yours and Wootens info and success with it ......hahah...... emoji57.png

Is your lost love only because of their shitty customer service or has there been faulty products or something else?

also, you have pm.

Mainly customer service, a little dubious of their custom cores as a lot of people had issues with EVO boltons becoming smokey (not a issue for you) and I'd still favour an HTA/HTZ3076 over the likes of a GTX3076R/PT5558 every time.  Will check PM when I have another bit of time spare.

  • Like 2

I was referring to the Borg Warner Airwecks S300 series or the new s320.They cheaper than the EFR series but there is a huge turbine to comp selection.

Using the matchbot see below. From the matchbot I should have above 17psi of boost by 3000rpm and full 26psi by 4500rpm.

image2.jpeg
image1.jpeg

57 minutes ago, B-rice said:

I was referring to the Borg Warner Airwecks S300 series or the new s320.They cheaper than the EFR series but there is a huge turbine to comp selection.

Using the matchbot see below. From the matchbot I should have above 17psi of boost by 3000rpm and full 26psi by 4500rpm.
 

I clearly misintepreted what you meant when you said " Has anyone got a compressor map for the HTA3582?" :P  

OK, I feel like I am reasonably switched on with engine/turbo dynamics but I keep seeing these "from the matchbot I should have xxpsi by yyrpm" comments and have no idea where people are getting that from - I feel like there isn't enough information available to do that, though I know there is always something to learn so I'll ask - how are you estimating that spool?

Edited by Lithium

My RB2530 was running a HTA GT3586R with the FP 0.85 rear. Best we got out of it was 463.7kW at the wheels on 25psi (dyno sheet is in the RB30 results thread) More boost and more timing made no difference to power. Mild non-Neo head, HKS cams, 3.5" exhaust. A 1.01 or 1.06 will be required to reach 500kW. Response was outstanding with the 0.85, will obviously lose a bit with the 1.01/1.06.
I decided to switch to the new Gen2 GTX3584RS with 1.01

  • Like 1

There are a number of ways to do it pretty much shit I learnt at uni. But anyone is very much capable of working it out. When I get home tonight I'll post here how it's done. It's pretty much similar to sizing a pump.

 

The matchbot link is here. I do realise this isn't a Borg Warner thread. http://www.turbos.borgwarner.com/go/78GY1U

 

 

  • Like 1
IMG_8083.JPG.c76be5ae43e06c203e255ca2095f45ad.JPG

Dyno of my old HTA GT3586R 0.85 set-up, to save on searching through the RB30 dyno results thread.



Looks a little laggier than I expected but I bet it felt a shitload faster in the real world when under load (dyno doesn't give real world load experience)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...