Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm with Rev on this one, I'm not sure I see squats as a great candidate for volume training,

Look at Markos beginner program, 2x 20 rep sets I think it is, then as soon as you can do that, you move into more focused training and the reps drop dramatically, regardless of if you want looks/size/strength, really high reps of squats isn't a good idea, but that's just my 2 cents and I know Birds you on a program which you're great at sticking to.

If you can do SIXTY reps before the knee bends in, I think you're doing fine.

my knees buckle inwards when I start getting tired. Its the first sign that my form is dropping.

If it isnt happening every set and every rep, probably isnt a real big issue. Just means its time to stop and go onto the next exercise.

If its happening from the first rep and pain builds up until you have to stop, then I say stop squatting

It happens past 50kg and obviously after many reps of 40kg. Birds told me to do as many reps as the 40kg as I can but I can see I'm not going to get much more than what I got out last night as I want to stop when my knee starts bending in.

Only thing is legs aren't sore at all today from squats, (they usually are sore the next day) so I'm a little worried I'm not really doing much to the muscles by keeping the weight at 40kg, but at 50kg my knee will bend in almost straight away.

have you tried 50 as your first working set?

that may answer if its fatigue causing the bending or not, otherwise may just be a strength thing that you need to work on

No I havent tried 50 as my first working set, I think it's a strength issue as I was doing it the other day when training with Birds and doing less sets.

However I can try 50kg first up next time just to double check

The reason she did fine for 60 reps is because I dropped the weight back to where it wouldn't happen.

Knee comes in at 45, 50, and badly at 60.

So for now my recommendation was to bring the weight back to a weight that didn't produce the fault, until squat mobility improves and strength will be built with volume at low weight rather than increasing the weight and having the knee come in. We will progressively be increasing the weight with small increments, as her knee allows, but for now I want her to be getting out volume so her muscles and joints know how to do the exercise even when tired.

Thinking about this one, I doubt it's anything to do with mobility at all. I'd say hip drive on this one.

Leesh , give this a shot and see if anything feels different. Without a bar or anything , get into a deep squat position.

if you can imagine at the top of your butt (where the tail bone is) You want to focus on driving upwards from that point as you move up. When the hip hinge is moving you will feel the movement has more strength the force will be moving through that point as a focus. Try this a few times without thinking about 'chest up' etc, till you recongise the hip motion.

If you have no hip drive , it will be becasue you have been taught to look all chest up and pretty in the squat first. Without hip drive the legs and quads cop the load alot more. I reckon this is pretty common. I recall this was one of my issues from way back when I learnt to squat right.

If I am right , then that weight you are doing will get blown into the weeds pretty quick.

Edited by rev210

So I did this, I'm thinking about moving up with the butt first yes? It's obviously easy to do with no weights, I'm not really sure what I'm meant to be feeling though, it seems a quicker motion however.

So I did this, I'm thinking about moving up with the butt first yes? It's obviously easy to do with no weights, I'm not really sure what I'm meant to be feeling though, it seems a quicker motion however.

Pretty much.

The fact you are noticing a 'quicker' motion means it's on like donkey kong. That there is the issue. Using the hips will produce way more power. The results will include 'speed' and power. Once the load is on, the hips will generate inertia and power in the lift. Hips are super important in squats .

do some focus on getting the most out of that section of the movement , enjoy exploiting it for a while and getting used to it.

Pretty much.

The fact you are noticing a 'quicker' motion means it's on like donkey kong. That there is the issue. Using the hips will produce way more power. The results will include 'speed' and power. Once the load is on, the hips will generate inertia and power in the lift. Hips are super important in squats .

do some focus on getting the most out of that section of the movement , enjoy exploiting it for a while and getting used to it.

Alrighty! hmmm, why do people say chest first instead of butt first then?

So I'm just going to think butt up first from now on?

I would like to try with some weights tomorrow and see how I go knee wise

Thanks for your help :)

To stop people's bad habit of looking at the ground and allowing the upper back to round. Chin up chest up. That was covered in those so you think you can squat videos, which I though you showed me.

To stop people's bad habit of looking at the ground and allowing the upper back to round. Chin up chest up. That was covered in those so you think you can squat videos, which I though you showed me.

yeah fair enough, after watching those videos I look higher up towards the ceiling now rather than into the mirror....much better!

Chin up / chest up causes as much issue (no hip drive) as head down. People seem to go overboard on tweaks vs core learnings.

I was taught at the very begining to work on hip hinge, then tweak other stuff like elbows back and chest up. Hip activation was the most critical part moving through the right alignment and position. I am not saying to the neglect of the other things but, if it isn't executed the squat isn't going to go right.

Looking down a little, a spot a few meters away on the ground , (as opposed to staring into the ceiling) helps to get the hip activation. When you are learning. High bar vs low bar also comes into play on how vertical the torso appears with the right spine and plane of movement vs depth.

Dan , reading back on your stuff, I am now pretty sure hip drive is your issue also.

Dan green in this training vid isn't checking light bulbs

16/10/13

Deadlift

50kg x 10

60kg x 10

70kg x 10

85kg x 1

95kg x 1

Bench Press

30kg x 10

35kg x 10

40kg x 7

40kg x 6

45kg x 1

45 Leg Press

80kg x 10

100kg x 10

120kg x 10

140kg x 10

160kg x 7

180kg x 1 (I had 2 spotters for this weight, as our machine doesnt have a safety catch, I felt like a powerlifter haha)

Captains Chair

25

20

25

20

25

Knee Raises

20

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...