Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^What he said

Also, high flow cats make a noticeable difference for both power and economy.

Any way you can remove/minimise restrictions will net you a slight increase in power and economy.

Pm35 power is good enough for normal commuting but does not have the torque that the nm35 has.

Also, the 3.5 doesn't really do much below 3000rpm. It is better than the VQ25det down there, but is much more enjoyable between 3500-6000.

As an ex-nm35 owner and current pnm35 owner, there is no chance I would go back... even though I do miss the torque from the turbo.

you will never re-map it for more fuel economy. It runs wideband o2 connection as scotty said. Unless you want the tuner to lean tune it and loose torque to gain economy, it just wont work. Removing the fuel out the top end will give economy, because it runs <10.5:1 AFR in the top end, but if your that concerned about econ, you wont be flogging it.

anyway, its just not economical. So youll need to get over that if you want one, or buy a diesel.

ECU dictates the target AFR, not whether the car has wideband o2 sensors or not.

Remap for a leaner AFR would mean better economy. Nobody said that the tune has to target 14.7:1, especially if you manage a way to get a more complete and efficient combustion process...

ECU dictates the target AFR, not whether the car has wideband o2 sensors or not.

Remap for a leaner AFR would mean better economy. Nobody said that the tune has to target 14.7:1, especially if you manage a way to get a more complete and efficient combustion process...

As Alex mentioned, leaning out the mixture drops the energy available to combust and usually means you need to put your foot down more, just to get the torque required to cruise. I must admit I haven't played around with petrol mixtures a lot, as leaning out 98 is a bad idea generally, but running a huge range of ethanol tunes from 10:1 through to over 20:1 on cruise I now realise near stoich is where it's at. Leaning it out to 15's is going to barely make a difference to the wallet unfortunately. Foot control of the pedal has more chance of fuel savings.

Seriously, they are never going to be lean running cars, they are simply too heavy to compete with modern buzz boxes with their skinny tyres and sub 1 ton weight. Thinking a quick retune will gain noticeable savings... Perhaps if you plan to do massive k's to cover the tune costs. Limiting the throttle to 20% would be a better idea. :P

[minor threadjack]

front wise, anything from 350z/V35 to the end of the Y pipe, rear of that, anything from a V35/G35 sedan

Does this hold true for PNM35s as well or does the AWD get in the way? I've been trying to find something for mine and while I've found the Zee's ones on YAJ they'd cost over $2K landed here in NZ and I'm pretty sure I could get a reasonable custom one built for that price.

[/minor threadjack]

Edited by Hertz Donut

[minor threadjack]

Does this hold true for PNM35s as well or does the AWD get in the way? I've been trying to find something for mine and while I've found the Zee's ones on YAJ they'd cost over $2K landed here in NZ and I'm pretty sure I could get a reasonable custom one built for that price.

[/minor threadjack]

The Y pipe 350z v PNM35 is very different, to get around the transfer case. Thats one difference. The other potential difference is the front shaft with HFCs or test pipes. I just don't know if they will fit or not. Some have massive seperate chambers etc, but the normal single HFC ones should fit ok.

Carbon canister is still there, it just sits horizontally and without the bracket.

V36 exhaust has massive rear mufflers and yes, the driver side one has to be "persuaded" to clear the spare wheel well lol.

Also, Scott had to weld up two additional exhaust mounts to hang the driver side on.

No problem with HFC's from the US. My PNM35 has G35 Berk cats which bolt straight up to the standard exhaust... they also bolt up to my V36 exhaust.

NM35 cat-back exhausts will also bolt up to a series 2 Y-pipe, regardless of whether it is 2WD or AWD.

As Alex said, the only thing that won't fit is the 350z/G35/V35 2WD y-pipe, so if you are looking at a US exhaust make sure it will fit on a 2003-2004 G35x.

Also, forget any coupe exhaust due to the spare wheel well.

If you are looking at headers, be warned that some of the 350z headers will foul on a PNM35 bodywork. You can fit them, but some will be sitting on the bodywork which is not so good considering how much the engine can move...

Zees exhausts cost heaps but seem to be very good quality from everything I have read (sound good too). Probably cheaper to get someone to fabricate up some exhaust mounts to fit a V36 exhaust and purchase a V36 (or G37x compatible) exhaust if you want dual mufflers though ;)

  • 3 years later...

Reviving an old thread here. (trying to find info on using different model cat back exhausts)

I've got a pm35 stagea, wondering if other models like M35 or NM35 aftermarket cat backs will bolt up?

For example:
https://www.rhdjapan.com/fujitsubo-legalis-r-exhaust-muffler-nm35.html

 

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...