Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

So after fitting my fmic, I've noticed a kind of high pitched (sort of metallic whining sound) when i put my foot down. I've checked all connections from the intercooler, and everything is on tight.

It sounds like it's coming from the front of the car, maybe slightly on the turbo side (but not too sure). Any ideas what it could be?

I can try get a video of it, though I'm not too sure how good my phone will be at recording the sound. Car sounds fine when driving normally, and hits my max boost of 10psi no problems (apart from the extra lag expected from installing the cooler). But yeh, the high whining sound kicks in maybe after 3k RPM or so.

Not sure if it's a normal sound after installing a fmic or if i have a leak somewhere :\

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/430365-high-pitched-whine-when-wot/
Share on other sites

hmmm alright thanks guys.

I'll have to strip it down and check where it could be leaking from.

Are there any cheap ways of testing for where the leaks are, because I don't own an air compressor or smoke machine or anything.

Get a can of start ya bastard and then go around the joints and spray them. Where there is a boost leak, could potentially be a vacuum leak and if thats the case, the spray will get sucked into the engine and it will alter the sound and RPM. I think you can use WD40 but DO NOT HOLD ME TO THAT. Others use butane torches and just piss gas on the joints, same principle, gas goes in alters sound indicates leak. Its gonna be from one of your silicone connectors.

If you've got a pod filter you can quickly jig up a PVC or other material with a tyre valve in it then drop down to the local petrol station, remove the pod and AFM and fit in your jig. Connect the tyre inflator to your valve on the jig and set the machine to a couple PSI then fill it up and listen for leaks. If you don't understand what I mean, basically you want to go to bunnings pickup a 3" diameter PVC end cap or a PVC end cap which will fit in the 3" silicone connector and be air tight when clamped down. Then you want to go to a tyre shop and pick up a tyre valve for a couple of dollars. Drill a hole in the end cap big enough to let the valve slip in and boom away you go. Hell you don't even have to go to the petrol station, you can technically use a bike pump. Just get air into an air tight system and if theres a leak, you'll know about it.

Unless you accidentally installed a supercharger.

intercooler hoses wouldn't create a vacuum leak as that part of the system doesn't experience vacuum. The start ya bastard would work around the plenum.

test for boost leaks like described. (I don't think a bike pump would work as there is allot of volume in the system and air does naturally leak past the rings a little)

pretty sure the intercooler hoses are under a vacuum, mine have sucked in there share of carby cleaner.. Id suggest some heavy duty clamps, mine have a habit of getting loose over time, b@#tards!

If the engine sounds smooth and isn't stalling then id be checking exhaust side, all bolts on manifold, turbo and dump..

Edited by AngryRB

There should not be any noticeable vacuum in any part of the inlet tract (ie in the intercooler pipes) at idle, or even driving. Under mild load there might be a very small vacuum in the cooler pipes, but in those conditions you wouldn't hear any change from a small shot of startysbastard. Under high load there should be some vacuum between the turbo inlet and the air filter (a couple of kPa) and lots of boost in the cooler pipes.

im confused now, surely if an engines running then its sucking air all the way from the intake valves to the air filter?

when I sprayed carby on my intake silcon pipe just near the turbo I had a reaction just last week so if there wasn't a vacuum then how can you explain that reaction?

although the EBC takes its reading from the manifold so that suggests its the best place to obtain a reading.

Edited by AngryRB

Can't seem to download the audio file james. It won't let me...

I saw the how to test for leaks mighty car mods video, and it's how you described using the pvc end cap and air nozzle.

But they use an air compressor to pump air inside. As i said earlier, i don't have access to one, and i'm scared a bicycle foot pump is way too small and will take ages to fill up the intake system.

Think about where the throttle is.

Doesn't make any sense ive got my boost controller after the throttle body between the intercooler and turbo and I get vacuum. If there is no vacuum the you are suggesting that if I seal the pod filter in an air tight container that it will run fine. This isnt the case. The engine is sucking in air all the time when it is not on boost and air like water will take the path of least resistance so if he has a leak anywhere after his intake valves air will come in. my boost controller reads -96. No idea what that means in terms of vacuum but thats greddys display.

Boost controller cannot be connected both "after the throttle body" and "between the intercooler and turbo". It can only be one of those or the other.

It is really very simple. When the throttle is closed, the engine generates a vacuum in the inlet manifold. Yes? We all know this. This is because the engine is pumping away merrily, and the throttle is a serious restriction to flow. There is a very small air flow gap around the throttle and through the idle control valve. So, at idle the manifold vacuum is in the manifold. It is not on the upstream side of the throttle. The pressure in the upstream pipework is not very far below atmospheric pressure. There is very little air flow, so there is very little friction or other causes of pressure drop. So there is almost no pressure change across the air filter, none across the turbo's compressor (it might go up a little or it might go down a little, depending on whether the turbo spinning around slowly is a nett restriction or a nett pump, but that's hardly a significant amount either way) and a couple of cfm of air flowing through 2.5" pipe work and an intercooler is not going to suffer any pressure drop. Hence, the pressure upstream the throttle body should be very nearly 1 full bar, absolute.

When the engine is at full load, the throttle is open, the compressor is spinning at 100k rpm, there is more air being pumped than the engine can suck, so the intercooler piping and the inlet manifold are all at approximately the same positive pressure. Slam the throttle shut and all of a sudden you will have vacuum back in the inlet manifold, and a lot of boost stuck in the inlet pipework that has to come out through the BOV, or dose.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...