Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For both above, I believe the block mount squirters release oil that should go to the bearings, and as much as I know the amount is not enough to make a big deffernce it's still oil released to put oil on something that already has plenty getting put on it, there is enough oil getting thrown from the big ends to coat everything with oil anyway

FFS if they needed to be there dont you think they would wither be there or there would be threads on here littered with people who have bought nitto rods and have then had engine failures.

I told you they are there to squirt a little oil at the piston on the oppoaite side to the block oil squirters to give more even cooling. Its only a small amount of oil and doesnt make a huge difference. Plenty of people running nitto roda and spool rods with no issues

They do however have the half moon slots in the conrod side faces to direct oil up and around. The argo rods I mean.

If you want to improve your Nitto rods, just get your machinist to cut the slots into the rod faces, its not very hard to do. Any chump with a mill and ball nose cutter can do it.

fat32gtr - Our RB26 rods do not run the oil squirter gallery from the big end like our RB30 rods do. We only use this feature on our rods where there are no oil squirters in the block for reasons mostly related to oil pressure. There is no need when the oil squirters in the block are already lubricating the pin area, cylinder bore and cooling the piston crown.

  • Like 1

Its not needed. The majority of aftermarket rods don't even have a feed to the pin bush.

The rod itself has more surface area than the OEM rods and flicks oil up off its surface. Its meant to spray into the piston to lubricate the oil rings.

Put your Nitto rods in your motor and forget about it mate.

In my experience it is a little more complicated than this. It depends on what the engine is used for.

I'm not an RB expert, but have built many (way to many) Datsun L series performance engines.

The oil squirter on the big end of the the conrod is for oiling the cylinder bores and the piston small end. Thus (at least in Datsun engines) it must be aimed towards the thrust side of the block.

That said, I have run engines with and without them. Here are my thoughts / things to consider:

1.) If you are running too high an oil pressure the amount of oil aimed on the cylinder wall / piston will be too high and lead to smoking / oil consumption. In my experience, up to about 75~80psi in a Datsun engine is ok, 80~100psi = too much oil on the bores. I'm guessing RB's would suffer from this too (although not sure of the pressure at which this would occur)

2.) If the engine is a race engine and the squirters are peened shut (or not existent) the cylinder walls / piston pins rely on the oil thrown off the crankshaft. Peening the oil squirter shut helps with big end oil pressure as none of it is lost in oiling the walls / pistons. In this case I did not run a windage tray, as I wanted that oil to be thrown around.

3.) If the oil squirters are closed or not existent, you are relying on the motion of the crankshaft to throw oil onto the pistons / bores. This works ok in a race engine where the RPM is normally sitting between 5000 and 9000rpm (at least on my Datsun engines) but does not work that great at low RPM (ie a city driven car)

4.) On teardown / inspection of various engines I have found the big end bearings have less ware when the squirters are closed, however there is more bore / piston wear on the thrust side, especially on engines which I have driven on the street.

So, in all the engines I build now, I add two groves (as suggested) to the big ends. Offset slightly so oil is aimed at the piston pin and also the thrust side of the bores.

Attached is a picture of a Datsun conrod for comparison (as well as a custom conrod and custom JE piston I am about to use.)

Just my 2c - think about what the engine is going to be used for. Street - notch the conrods. Race - leave them out.

Edit - and don't forget to re-balance the rods end for end after they are notched (if it's going to see any high rpm)

post-59782-0-11151200-1377032538_thumb.jpg

Edited by datsun_1600
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...