Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You are looking at spending 10k to have it pull hard..

You will spend a lot less if you get your stock turbo highflowed to the right profile, it will definitely give you the pull hard effect and will cost you a lot less.

I reckon a Hypergear G3.5 highflow will do a good job of the desired task, the delivery will give monster pull without being a pig to drive.

Before you ask, you will need a full 3" TBE, FMIC, fuel pump, injectors and an ECU at a minimum.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433565-gt35r-or-gt30r/#findComment-7069538
Share on other sites

It's not rocket surgery.

It's not brain science either.

GTScotT is offering some sound, experience based advice. He's also considering the driving outcome and financial aspect of things.

However if you are chasing a 500rwhp setup you won't likely get there with a GT30 setup. Go the GT35 and be mindful of people's comments to this point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433565-gt35r-or-gt30r/#findComment-7069729
Share on other sites

At the moment no one has given me a answer or opinion on what one would be more suitable

Yes they have...this:

I reckon a Hypergear G3.5 highflow will do a good job of the desired task, the delivery will give monster pull without being a pig to drive.

and see also:

Look at the rb25 dyno results thread. It's not rocket surgery. People don't have to tell you what to do, you can figure it out yourself sometimes!

and forget the GT35

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433565-gt35r-or-gt30r/#findComment-7069772
Share on other sites

3076 56T with a .63 on E85 hits like a sledgehammer...

the hypergear stuff in same size are a more linear pull and deceptively quick, but probally faster no doubt

guess it depends what you after, i have no idea what a 3450 feels like on a rb25, only 25/30's and 30s's

guessing boost response would be fairly bad on a manual

cheers

darren

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433565-gt35r-or-gt30r/#findComment-7069900
Share on other sites

Glad you put that 3 inch cooler piping, talk about overkill. You can make an easy 300kw on 2.25 inch piping.

Stop slapping parts on and read, there is so much information here you should be able to work out what you need, then see if you can go for a spin in a few members cars to get a feel for the response. I am guessing the GT35 will be a little too laggy if you plan to drive it daily.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433565-gt35r-or-gt30r/#findComment-7070093
Share on other sites

Read this thread - ultimate RB "pull hard" setup, make numbers in the range of GT35R peak power but spooling similar to the smaller GT30 range turbos:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/426059-forced-performance-hta-turbos/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433565-gt35r-or-gt30r/#findComment-7073476
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...